Radiation dose in chest CT

Assessment of size-specific dose estimates based on water-equivalent correction

M. Gabusi, L. Riccardi, C. Aliberti, S. Vio, M. Paiusco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: In the setting of thorax Computed Tomography (CT), the main purpose of this work is to quantify differences in Size-Specific Dose Estimate (SSDE), calculated on the basis of both effective diameter and water-equivalent diameter, accounting for patient size and tissue attenuation, respectively. Materials and methods: An in-house software was developed to measure water-equivalent diameter and effective diameter on each CT slice, for 133 CT examinations. SSDE was calculated according to the Report of American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group (AAPM TG) 204 and 220. The ratio between effective and water-equivalent diameters was studied as function of cross-sectional air-to-body area ratio, for the slice located in the middle of the scan range. Results: When AAPM TG 220 prescriptions were applied, SSDE was mostly found larger than that obtained with AAPM TG 204 recommendations. On average, a difference of about 12% was observed, in spite of a considerable variability (from -18% to 53%). The ratio between effective and water-equivalent diameters ranged from 0.97 to 1.31, with a mean value of 1.15. Moreover, it was found considerably correlated with cross-sectional air-to-body ratio (Pearson's coefficient was 0.78 for women, 0.90 for men). Conclusion: The discrepancy obtained by calculating SSDE on the basis of AAPM TG 204, instead of AAPM TG 220 Report, may vary substantially. Fluctuations were justified by the variability observed in the relative amount of low attenuating tissues in body, which was proved to be considerably correlated to the ratio between effective and water-equivalent diameters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-397
Number of pages5
JournalPhysica Medica
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

chest
Thorax
tomography
Tomography
Medicine
medicine
Radiation
dosage
Water
radiation
estimates
water
Air
thorax
Prescriptions
air
Software
recommendations
examination
attenuation

Keywords

  • Computed tomography
  • Dose
  • SSDE
  • Water-equivalent diameter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Radiation dose in chest CT : Assessment of size-specific dose estimates based on water-equivalent correction. / Gabusi, M.; Riccardi, L.; Aliberti, C.; Vio, S.; Paiusco, M.

In: Physica Medica, Vol. 32, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 393-397.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{79120ed4da3b4f4c98351e3fc81a5d51,
title = "Radiation dose in chest CT: Assessment of size-specific dose estimates based on water-equivalent correction",
abstract = "Purpose: In the setting of thorax Computed Tomography (CT), the main purpose of this work is to quantify differences in Size-Specific Dose Estimate (SSDE), calculated on the basis of both effective diameter and water-equivalent diameter, accounting for patient size and tissue attenuation, respectively. Materials and methods: An in-house software was developed to measure water-equivalent diameter and effective diameter on each CT slice, for 133 CT examinations. SSDE was calculated according to the Report of American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group (AAPM TG) 204 and 220. The ratio between effective and water-equivalent diameters was studied as function of cross-sectional air-to-body area ratio, for the slice located in the middle of the scan range. Results: When AAPM TG 220 prescriptions were applied, SSDE was mostly found larger than that obtained with AAPM TG 204 recommendations. On average, a difference of about 12{\%} was observed, in spite of a considerable variability (from -18{\%} to 53{\%}). The ratio between effective and water-equivalent diameters ranged from 0.97 to 1.31, with a mean value of 1.15. Moreover, it was found considerably correlated with cross-sectional air-to-body ratio (Pearson's coefficient was 0.78 for women, 0.90 for men). Conclusion: The discrepancy obtained by calculating SSDE on the basis of AAPM TG 204, instead of AAPM TG 220 Report, may vary substantially. Fluctuations were justified by the variability observed in the relative amount of low attenuating tissues in body, which was proved to be considerably correlated to the ratio between effective and water-equivalent diameters.",
keywords = "Computed tomography, Dose, SSDE, Water-equivalent diameter",
author = "M. Gabusi and L. Riccardi and C. Aliberti and S. Vio and M. Paiusco",
note = "gi{\`a} presentato per RC 2016 - inserito in SIPS",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.12.008",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "393--397",
journal = "Physica Medica",
issn = "1120-1797",
publisher = "Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiation dose in chest CT

T2 - Assessment of size-specific dose estimates based on water-equivalent correction

AU - Gabusi, M.

AU - Riccardi, L.

AU - Aliberti, C.

AU - Vio, S.

AU - Paiusco, M.

N1 - già presentato per RC 2016 - inserito in SIPS

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Purpose: In the setting of thorax Computed Tomography (CT), the main purpose of this work is to quantify differences in Size-Specific Dose Estimate (SSDE), calculated on the basis of both effective diameter and water-equivalent diameter, accounting for patient size and tissue attenuation, respectively. Materials and methods: An in-house software was developed to measure water-equivalent diameter and effective diameter on each CT slice, for 133 CT examinations. SSDE was calculated according to the Report of American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group (AAPM TG) 204 and 220. The ratio between effective and water-equivalent diameters was studied as function of cross-sectional air-to-body area ratio, for the slice located in the middle of the scan range. Results: When AAPM TG 220 prescriptions were applied, SSDE was mostly found larger than that obtained with AAPM TG 204 recommendations. On average, a difference of about 12% was observed, in spite of a considerable variability (from -18% to 53%). The ratio between effective and water-equivalent diameters ranged from 0.97 to 1.31, with a mean value of 1.15. Moreover, it was found considerably correlated with cross-sectional air-to-body ratio (Pearson's coefficient was 0.78 for women, 0.90 for men). Conclusion: The discrepancy obtained by calculating SSDE on the basis of AAPM TG 204, instead of AAPM TG 220 Report, may vary substantially. Fluctuations were justified by the variability observed in the relative amount of low attenuating tissues in body, which was proved to be considerably correlated to the ratio between effective and water-equivalent diameters.

AB - Purpose: In the setting of thorax Computed Tomography (CT), the main purpose of this work is to quantify differences in Size-Specific Dose Estimate (SSDE), calculated on the basis of both effective diameter and water-equivalent diameter, accounting for patient size and tissue attenuation, respectively. Materials and methods: An in-house software was developed to measure water-equivalent diameter and effective diameter on each CT slice, for 133 CT examinations. SSDE was calculated according to the Report of American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group (AAPM TG) 204 and 220. The ratio between effective and water-equivalent diameters was studied as function of cross-sectional air-to-body area ratio, for the slice located in the middle of the scan range. Results: When AAPM TG 220 prescriptions were applied, SSDE was mostly found larger than that obtained with AAPM TG 204 recommendations. On average, a difference of about 12% was observed, in spite of a considerable variability (from -18% to 53%). The ratio between effective and water-equivalent diameters ranged from 0.97 to 1.31, with a mean value of 1.15. Moreover, it was found considerably correlated with cross-sectional air-to-body ratio (Pearson's coefficient was 0.78 for women, 0.90 for men). Conclusion: The discrepancy obtained by calculating SSDE on the basis of AAPM TG 204, instead of AAPM TG 220 Report, may vary substantially. Fluctuations were justified by the variability observed in the relative amount of low attenuating tissues in body, which was proved to be considerably correlated to the ratio between effective and water-equivalent diameters.

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Dose

KW - SSDE

KW - Water-equivalent diameter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960252763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960252763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.12.008

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 393

EP - 397

JO - Physica Medica

JF - Physica Medica

SN - 1120-1797

IS - 2

ER -