Radiologic malpractice litigation risk in italy: An observational study over a 14-Year period

Adriano Fileni, Nicola Magnavita, Paoletta Mirk, Ivo Iavicoli, Giulia Magnavita, Antonio Bergamaschi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to assess the risk of medical malpractice litigation for Italian radiologists, compared with the corresponding data in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The insurance claims of Italian radiologists over the 1993-2006 period were anonymously assessed and classified according to the cause of the claim. RESULTS. A total of 1,424 claims were filed during the examined period, with most claims being filed at a considerable time interval after the event (up to 10 years). The resulting incidence may be estimated as 44.2 cases per 1,000, meaning that 44% of Italian radiologists have received, or will receive, summons regarding their professional activity during the past 10 years. CONCLUSION. The risk of medical malpractice litigation for Italian radiologists is by now comparable to that for American radiologists. Comparison with previous data concerning the same study population shows that the diagnostic errors category has surpassed all other error categories (nondiagnostic errors) and that, within the diagnostic errors category, claims for allegedly missed cancer have surpassed claims for allegedly missed bone abnormalities. Among missed diagnosis claims, the maximum increase concerned mammograms. Strict adherence to radiologic standards and radiotherapy protocols may be a means of reducing the risk of legal action and obviating litigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1040-1046
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume194
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Malpractice
Jurisprudence
Italy
Observational Studies
Diagnostic Errors
Insurance
Radiotherapy
Radiologists
Bone and Bones
Incidence
Population
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Clinical risk management
  • Error
  • Liability
  • Malpractice
  • Radiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Fileni, A., Magnavita, N., Mirk, P., Iavicoli, I., Magnavita, G., & Bergamaschi, A. (2010). Radiologic malpractice litigation risk in italy: An observational study over a 14-Year period. American Journal of Roentgenology, 194(4), 1040-1046. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3457

Radiologic malpractice litigation risk in italy : An observational study over a 14-Year period. / Fileni, Adriano; Magnavita, Nicola; Mirk, Paoletta; Iavicoli, Ivo; Magnavita, Giulia; Bergamaschi, Antonio.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 194, No. 4, 04.2010, p. 1040-1046.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fileni, A, Magnavita, N, Mirk, P, Iavicoli, I, Magnavita, G & Bergamaschi, A 2010, 'Radiologic malpractice litigation risk in italy: An observational study over a 14-Year period', American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 194, no. 4, pp. 1040-1046. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3457
Fileni, Adriano ; Magnavita, Nicola ; Mirk, Paoletta ; Iavicoli, Ivo ; Magnavita, Giulia ; Bergamaschi, Antonio. / Radiologic malpractice litigation risk in italy : An observational study over a 14-Year period. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 2010 ; Vol. 194, No. 4. pp. 1040-1046.
@article{2cd55f23771a4de8884d4f0a148ef46b,
title = "Radiologic malpractice litigation risk in italy: An observational study over a 14-Year period",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to assess the risk of medical malpractice litigation for Italian radiologists, compared with the corresponding data in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The insurance claims of Italian radiologists over the 1993-2006 period were anonymously assessed and classified according to the cause of the claim. RESULTS. A total of 1,424 claims were filed during the examined period, with most claims being filed at a considerable time interval after the event (up to 10 years). The resulting incidence may be estimated as 44.2 cases per 1,000, meaning that 44{\%} of Italian radiologists have received, or will receive, summons regarding their professional activity during the past 10 years. CONCLUSION. The risk of medical malpractice litigation for Italian radiologists is by now comparable to that for American radiologists. Comparison with previous data concerning the same study population shows that the diagnostic errors category has surpassed all other error categories (nondiagnostic errors) and that, within the diagnostic errors category, claims for allegedly missed cancer have surpassed claims for allegedly missed bone abnormalities. Among missed diagnosis claims, the maximum increase concerned mammograms. Strict adherence to radiologic standards and radiotherapy protocols may be a means of reducing the risk of legal action and obviating litigation.",
keywords = "Clinical risk management, Error, Liability, Malpractice, Radiology",
author = "Adriano Fileni and Nicola Magnavita and Paoletta Mirk and Ivo Iavicoli and Giulia Magnavita and Antonio Bergamaschi",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.2214/AJR.09.3457",
language = "English",
volume = "194",
pages = "1040--1046",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiologic malpractice litigation risk in italy

T2 - An observational study over a 14-Year period

AU - Fileni, Adriano

AU - Magnavita, Nicola

AU - Mirk, Paoletta

AU - Iavicoli, Ivo

AU - Magnavita, Giulia

AU - Bergamaschi, Antonio

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to assess the risk of medical malpractice litigation for Italian radiologists, compared with the corresponding data in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The insurance claims of Italian radiologists over the 1993-2006 period were anonymously assessed and classified according to the cause of the claim. RESULTS. A total of 1,424 claims were filed during the examined period, with most claims being filed at a considerable time interval after the event (up to 10 years). The resulting incidence may be estimated as 44.2 cases per 1,000, meaning that 44% of Italian radiologists have received, or will receive, summons regarding their professional activity during the past 10 years. CONCLUSION. The risk of medical malpractice litigation for Italian radiologists is by now comparable to that for American radiologists. Comparison with previous data concerning the same study population shows that the diagnostic errors category has surpassed all other error categories (nondiagnostic errors) and that, within the diagnostic errors category, claims for allegedly missed cancer have surpassed claims for allegedly missed bone abnormalities. Among missed diagnosis claims, the maximum increase concerned mammograms. Strict adherence to radiologic standards and radiotherapy protocols may be a means of reducing the risk of legal action and obviating litigation.

AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to assess the risk of medical malpractice litigation for Italian radiologists, compared with the corresponding data in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The insurance claims of Italian radiologists over the 1993-2006 period were anonymously assessed and classified according to the cause of the claim. RESULTS. A total of 1,424 claims were filed during the examined period, with most claims being filed at a considerable time interval after the event (up to 10 years). The resulting incidence may be estimated as 44.2 cases per 1,000, meaning that 44% of Italian radiologists have received, or will receive, summons regarding their professional activity during the past 10 years. CONCLUSION. The risk of medical malpractice litigation for Italian radiologists is by now comparable to that for American radiologists. Comparison with previous data concerning the same study population shows that the diagnostic errors category has surpassed all other error categories (nondiagnostic errors) and that, within the diagnostic errors category, claims for allegedly missed cancer have surpassed claims for allegedly missed bone abnormalities. Among missed diagnosis claims, the maximum increase concerned mammograms. Strict adherence to radiologic standards and radiotherapy protocols may be a means of reducing the risk of legal action and obviating litigation.

KW - Clinical risk management

KW - Error

KW - Liability

KW - Malpractice

KW - Radiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950625142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950625142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.09.3457

DO - 10.2214/AJR.09.3457

M3 - Article

C2 - 20308508

AN - SCOPUS:77950625142

VL - 194

SP - 1040

EP - 1046

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 4

ER -