Radiology for Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding

A Simplified Follow-up Examination Method

Fabio Pomerri, Francesco De Marchi, Giulio Barbiero, Antonio Di Maggio, Cristina Zavarella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to Identify factors which allow a reliable, standardized and simplified approach for the radiologic follow-up of obese patients who have undergone surgery for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) placement. Methods: A study was made of 370 consecutive single-contrast upper gastrointestinal series in 159 consecutive patients (122 women, 31 men; mean age 40.6 years; mean body weight 135.8 kg) who had undergone LAGB for morbid obesity and were symptomatic or had inadequate weight loss.The control group consisted of 38 subjects who had undergone LAGB, had satisfactory weight loss and were asymptomatic at follow-up. Results: Each gastric portion above the band was satisfactorily evaluated by measuring its vertical diameter. The optimal projection for measurement of stoma size was predicted before administration of the contrast agent and was achieved when the band was visualized in profile. The clinical pictures were not always related to stoma size. Surgical complications were gastric herniation (8 patients, twice in 1 patient, 5.7%), malpositioned band (1 patient, 1.6%), port twisting (13 patients, 8.2%), and disconnection or leakage of the device (8 patients, 5.0%). Conclusion: Essential criteria for the radiologic evaluation of LAGB are: position of port and tubing; stoma size; and volume of each upper gastric portion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)901-908
Number of pages8
JournalObesity Surgery
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2003

Fingerprint

Radiology
Stomach
Weight Loss
Morbid Obesity
Laparoscopy
Contrast Media
Body Weight
Equipment and Supplies
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Bariatric surgery
  • Gastric banding
  • Laparoscopic surgery
  • Morbid obesity
  • Radiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Radiology for Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding : A Simplified Follow-up Examination Method. / Pomerri, Fabio; De Marchi, Francesco; Barbiero, Giulio; Di Maggio, Antonio; Zavarella, Cristina.

In: Obesity Surgery, Vol. 13, No. 6, 12.2003, p. 901-908.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pomerri, F, De Marchi, F, Barbiero, G, Di Maggio, A & Zavarella, C 2003, 'Radiology for Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: A Simplified Follow-up Examination Method', Obesity Surgery, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 901-908. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089203322618740
Pomerri, Fabio ; De Marchi, Francesco ; Barbiero, Giulio ; Di Maggio, Antonio ; Zavarella, Cristina. / Radiology for Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding : A Simplified Follow-up Examination Method. In: Obesity Surgery. 2003 ; Vol. 13, No. 6. pp. 901-908.
@article{801da8c7cbb04e0bbc779ecda776c3ce,
title = "Radiology for Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: A Simplified Follow-up Examination Method",
abstract = "Background: The aim of this study was to Identify factors which allow a reliable, standardized and simplified approach for the radiologic follow-up of obese patients who have undergone surgery for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) placement. Methods: A study was made of 370 consecutive single-contrast upper gastrointestinal series in 159 consecutive patients (122 women, 31 men; mean age 40.6 years; mean body weight 135.8 kg) who had undergone LAGB for morbid obesity and were symptomatic or had inadequate weight loss.The control group consisted of 38 subjects who had undergone LAGB, had satisfactory weight loss and were asymptomatic at follow-up. Results: Each gastric portion above the band was satisfactorily evaluated by measuring its vertical diameter. The optimal projection for measurement of stoma size was predicted before administration of the contrast agent and was achieved when the band was visualized in profile. The clinical pictures were not always related to stoma size. Surgical complications were gastric herniation (8 patients, twice in 1 patient, 5.7{\%}), malpositioned band (1 patient, 1.6{\%}), port twisting (13 patients, 8.2{\%}), and disconnection or leakage of the device (8 patients, 5.0{\%}). Conclusion: Essential criteria for the radiologic evaluation of LAGB are: position of port and tubing; stoma size; and volume of each upper gastric portion.",
keywords = "Bariatric surgery, Gastric banding, Laparoscopic surgery, Morbid obesity, Radiology",
author = "Fabio Pomerri and {De Marchi}, Francesco and Giulio Barbiero and {Di Maggio}, Antonio and Cristina Zavarella",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1381/096089203322618740",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "901--908",
journal = "Obesity Surgery",
issn = "0960-8923",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiology for Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding

T2 - A Simplified Follow-up Examination Method

AU - Pomerri, Fabio

AU - De Marchi, Francesco

AU - Barbiero, Giulio

AU - Di Maggio, Antonio

AU - Zavarella, Cristina

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - Background: The aim of this study was to Identify factors which allow a reliable, standardized and simplified approach for the radiologic follow-up of obese patients who have undergone surgery for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) placement. Methods: A study was made of 370 consecutive single-contrast upper gastrointestinal series in 159 consecutive patients (122 women, 31 men; mean age 40.6 years; mean body weight 135.8 kg) who had undergone LAGB for morbid obesity and were symptomatic or had inadequate weight loss.The control group consisted of 38 subjects who had undergone LAGB, had satisfactory weight loss and were asymptomatic at follow-up. Results: Each gastric portion above the band was satisfactorily evaluated by measuring its vertical diameter. The optimal projection for measurement of stoma size was predicted before administration of the contrast agent and was achieved when the band was visualized in profile. The clinical pictures were not always related to stoma size. Surgical complications were gastric herniation (8 patients, twice in 1 patient, 5.7%), malpositioned band (1 patient, 1.6%), port twisting (13 patients, 8.2%), and disconnection or leakage of the device (8 patients, 5.0%). Conclusion: Essential criteria for the radiologic evaluation of LAGB are: position of port and tubing; stoma size; and volume of each upper gastric portion.

AB - Background: The aim of this study was to Identify factors which allow a reliable, standardized and simplified approach for the radiologic follow-up of obese patients who have undergone surgery for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) placement. Methods: A study was made of 370 consecutive single-contrast upper gastrointestinal series in 159 consecutive patients (122 women, 31 men; mean age 40.6 years; mean body weight 135.8 kg) who had undergone LAGB for morbid obesity and were symptomatic or had inadequate weight loss.The control group consisted of 38 subjects who had undergone LAGB, had satisfactory weight loss and were asymptomatic at follow-up. Results: Each gastric portion above the band was satisfactorily evaluated by measuring its vertical diameter. The optimal projection for measurement of stoma size was predicted before administration of the contrast agent and was achieved when the band was visualized in profile. The clinical pictures were not always related to stoma size. Surgical complications were gastric herniation (8 patients, twice in 1 patient, 5.7%), malpositioned band (1 patient, 1.6%), port twisting (13 patients, 8.2%), and disconnection or leakage of the device (8 patients, 5.0%). Conclusion: Essential criteria for the radiologic evaluation of LAGB are: position of port and tubing; stoma size; and volume of each upper gastric portion.

KW - Bariatric surgery

KW - Gastric banding

KW - Laparoscopic surgery

KW - Morbid obesity

KW - Radiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346887079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346887079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1381/096089203322618740

DO - 10.1381/096089203322618740

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 901

EP - 908

JO - Obesity Surgery

JF - Obesity Surgery

SN - 0960-8923

IS - 6

ER -