Radon concentration in self-bottled mineral spring waters as a possible public health issue

Christian Di Carlo, L Lepore, G Venoso, M Ampollini, C Carpentieri, A Tannino, E Ragno, A Magliano, C D'Amario, R Remetti, Francesco Bochicchio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Since 2013, the Council Directive 2013/51/Euratom has been regulating the content of radioactive substances in water intended for human consumption. However, mineral waters are exempted from this regulation, including self-bottled springs waters, where higher radon concentration are expected. Therefore, a systematic survey has been conducted on all the 33 mineral spring waters of Lazio (a region of Central Italy) in order to assess if such waters, when self-bottled, may be of concern for public health. Waters have been sampled in two different ways to evaluate the impact of bottling on radon concentration. Water sampling was possible for 20 different spring waters, with 6 samples for each one. The results show that 2 (10%) of measured mineral spring waters returned radon concentrations higher than 100 Bq L-1, i.e., the parametric value established by the Council Directive. These results, if confirmed by other surveys involving a higher number of mineral spring waters, would suggest regulating also these waters, especially in countries like Italy for which: (i) mineral water consumption is significant; (ii) mineral concession owners generally allow the consumers to fill bottles and containers, intended for transport and subsequent consumption, directly from public fountains or from fountains within the plant; (iii) the consumers' habit of drinking self-bottled mineral water is widespread.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14252
Number of pages7
JournalSci. Rep.
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 3 2019

Keywords

  • Radiation Protection
  • Radon
  • drinking water assessment

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Radon concentration in self-bottled mineral spring waters as a possible public health issue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this