TY - JOUR
T1 - Raltegravir plasma concentrations in treatment-experienced patients receiving salvage regimens based on raltegravir with and without maraviroc coadministration
AU - Baroncelli, Silvia
AU - Villani, Paola
AU - Weimer, Liliana E.
AU - Ladisa, Nicoletta
AU - Francisci, Daniela
AU - Tommasi, Chiara
AU - Vullo, Vincenzo
AU - Preziosi, Roberta
AU - Cicalini, Stefania
AU - Cusato, Maria
AU - Galluzzo, Clementina M.
AU - Floridia, Marco
AU - Regazzi, Mario
PY - 2010/5
Y1 - 2010/5
N2 - BACKGROUND: Raltegravir and maraviroc represent new, important resources for HIV-infected patients with intolerance or resistance to other antiretroviral agents. The safety and efficacy of both drugs have been investigated, but there is no information on possible pharmacokinetic interactions between these 2 drugs in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate raltegravir plasma concentrations in heavily treatmentexperienced patients receiving salvage regimens and explore, in a preliminary assessment, the potential influence of maraviroc coadministration and other cofactors on raltegravir trough concentrations (Ctrough). METHODS: Fifty-four HIV-infected patients with triple class (nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, protease inhibitor) treatment experience starting raltegravir 400 mg twice daily, with (n = 11) or without (n = 43) concomitant maraviroc 300 mg twice daily, were evaluated. All regimens included at least 3 drugs of at least 2 different classes. Raltegravir plasma C
trough, after at least 1 month of treatment, were analyzed to compare groups of patients taking raltegravir only and raltegravir plus maraviroc. Immunovirological (CD4, HIV-RNA) and clinical data after 6 months of treatment were also collected and described. RESULTS: Raltegravir plasma C
trough showed a large variability (range 0.02 μg/mL) raltegravir concentrations were observed in all patients receiving raltegravir + maraviroc and in 74% of patients receiving raltegravir alone (p = 0.060). After 6 months of treatment, the 2 groups had similar clinical, virologic, and immunologic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of maraviroc does not seem to have any relevant effects on raltegravir plasma C
trough in heavily treatment-experienced patients receiving salvage regimens. Further studies should evaluate the potential additional benefits of maraviroc coadministration in terms of virologic and immunologic response.
AB - BACKGROUND: Raltegravir and maraviroc represent new, important resources for HIV-infected patients with intolerance or resistance to other antiretroviral agents. The safety and efficacy of both drugs have been investigated, but there is no information on possible pharmacokinetic interactions between these 2 drugs in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate raltegravir plasma concentrations in heavily treatmentexperienced patients receiving salvage regimens and explore, in a preliminary assessment, the potential influence of maraviroc coadministration and other cofactors on raltegravir trough concentrations (Ctrough). METHODS: Fifty-four HIV-infected patients with triple class (nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, protease inhibitor) treatment experience starting raltegravir 400 mg twice daily, with (n = 11) or without (n = 43) concomitant maraviroc 300 mg twice daily, were evaluated. All regimens included at least 3 drugs of at least 2 different classes. Raltegravir plasma C
trough, after at least 1 month of treatment, were analyzed to compare groups of patients taking raltegravir only and raltegravir plus maraviroc. Immunovirological (CD4, HIV-RNA) and clinical data after 6 months of treatment were also collected and described. RESULTS: Raltegravir plasma C
trough showed a large variability (range 0.02 μg/mL) raltegravir concentrations were observed in all patients receiving raltegravir + maraviroc and in 74% of patients receiving raltegravir alone (p = 0.060). After 6 months of treatment, the 2 groups had similar clinical, virologic, and immunologic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of maraviroc does not seem to have any relevant effects on raltegravir plasma C
trough in heavily treatment-experienced patients receiving salvage regimens. Further studies should evaluate the potential additional benefits of maraviroc coadministration in terms of virologic and immunologic response.
KW - Drug interactions
KW - Maraviroc
KW - Plasma drug concentrations
KW - Raltegravir
KW - Salvage regimens
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951596371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951596371&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1345/aph.1M688
DO - 10.1345/aph.1M688
M3 - Article
C2 - 20371753
AN - SCOPUS:77951596371
VL - 44
SP - 838
EP - 843
JO - Annals of Pharmacotherapy
JF - Annals of Pharmacotherapy
SN - 1060-0280
IS - 5
ER -