Randomized comparison of awake nonresectional versus nonawake resectional lung volume reduction surgery

Eugenio Pompeo, Paola Rogliani, Federico Tacconi, Mario Dauri, Cesare Saltini, Giuseppe Novelli, Tommaso C. Mineo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The study objective was to assess in a randomized controlled study (NCT00566839) the comparative results of awake nonresectional or nonawake resectional lung volume reduction surgery. Method: Sixty-three patients were randomly assigned by computer to receive unilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery lung volume reduction surgery by a nonresectional technique performed through epidural anesthesia in 32 awake patients (awake group) or the standard resectional technique performed through general anesthesia in 31 patients (control group). Primary outcomes were hospital stay and changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second. During follow-up, the need of contralateral treatment because of loss of postoperative benefit was considered a failure event as death. Results: Intergroup comparisons (awake vs control) showed no difference in gender, age, and body mass index. Hospital stay was shorter in the awake group (6 vs 7.5 days, P = .04) with 21 versus 10 patients discharged within 6 days (P = .01). At 6 months, forced expiratory volume in 1 second improved significantly in both study groups (0.28 vs 0.29 L) with no intergroup difference (P = .79). In both groups, forced expiratory volume in 1 second improvements lasted more than 24 months. At 36 months, freedom from contralateral treatment was 55% versus 50% (P = .5) and survival was 81% versus 87% (P = .5). Conclusions: In this randomized study, awake nonresectional lung volume reduction surgery resulted in significantly shorter hospital stay than the nonawake procedure. There were no differences between study groups in physiologic improvements, freedom from contralateral treatment, and survival. We speculate that compared with the nonawake procedure, awake lung volume reduction surgery can offer similar clinical benefit but a faster postoperative recovery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-54
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume143
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Pneumonectomy
Forced Expiratory Volume
Length of Stay
Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery
Survival
Epidural Anesthesia
General Anesthesia
Body Mass Index
Therapeutics
Control Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Randomized comparison of awake nonresectional versus nonawake resectional lung volume reduction surgery. / Pompeo, Eugenio; Rogliani, Paola; Tacconi, Federico; Dauri, Mario; Saltini, Cesare; Novelli, Giuseppe; Mineo, Tommaso C.

In: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 143, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 47-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pompeo, Eugenio ; Rogliani, Paola ; Tacconi, Federico ; Dauri, Mario ; Saltini, Cesare ; Novelli, Giuseppe ; Mineo, Tommaso C. / Randomized comparison of awake nonresectional versus nonawake resectional lung volume reduction surgery. In: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 143, No. 1. pp. 47-54.
@article{226676f0b0cb4af8b41ffa94897f498f,
title = "Randomized comparison of awake nonresectional versus nonawake resectional lung volume reduction surgery",
abstract = "Objective: The study objective was to assess in a randomized controlled study (NCT00566839) the comparative results of awake nonresectional or nonawake resectional lung volume reduction surgery. Method: Sixty-three patients were randomly assigned by computer to receive unilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery lung volume reduction surgery by a nonresectional technique performed through epidural anesthesia in 32 awake patients (awake group) or the standard resectional technique performed through general anesthesia in 31 patients (control group). Primary outcomes were hospital stay and changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second. During follow-up, the need of contralateral treatment because of loss of postoperative benefit was considered a failure event as death. Results: Intergroup comparisons (awake vs control) showed no difference in gender, age, and body mass index. Hospital stay was shorter in the awake group (6 vs 7.5 days, P = .04) with 21 versus 10 patients discharged within 6 days (P = .01). At 6 months, forced expiratory volume in 1 second improved significantly in both study groups (0.28 vs 0.29 L) with no intergroup difference (P = .79). In both groups, forced expiratory volume in 1 second improvements lasted more than 24 months. At 36 months, freedom from contralateral treatment was 55{\%} versus 50{\%} (P = .5) and survival was 81{\%} versus 87{\%} (P = .5). Conclusions: In this randomized study, awake nonresectional lung volume reduction surgery resulted in significantly shorter hospital stay than the nonawake procedure. There were no differences between study groups in physiologic improvements, freedom from contralateral treatment, and survival. We speculate that compared with the nonawake procedure, awake lung volume reduction surgery can offer similar clinical benefit but a faster postoperative recovery.",
author = "Eugenio Pompeo and Paola Rogliani and Federico Tacconi and Mario Dauri and Cesare Saltini and Giuseppe Novelli and Mineo, {Tommaso C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.09.050",
language = "English",
volume = "143",
pages = "47--54",
journal = "Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery",
issn = "0022-5223",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized comparison of awake nonresectional versus nonawake resectional lung volume reduction surgery

AU - Pompeo, Eugenio

AU - Rogliani, Paola

AU - Tacconi, Federico

AU - Dauri, Mario

AU - Saltini, Cesare

AU - Novelli, Giuseppe

AU - Mineo, Tommaso C.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Objective: The study objective was to assess in a randomized controlled study (NCT00566839) the comparative results of awake nonresectional or nonawake resectional lung volume reduction surgery. Method: Sixty-three patients were randomly assigned by computer to receive unilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery lung volume reduction surgery by a nonresectional technique performed through epidural anesthesia in 32 awake patients (awake group) or the standard resectional technique performed through general anesthesia in 31 patients (control group). Primary outcomes were hospital stay and changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second. During follow-up, the need of contralateral treatment because of loss of postoperative benefit was considered a failure event as death. Results: Intergroup comparisons (awake vs control) showed no difference in gender, age, and body mass index. Hospital stay was shorter in the awake group (6 vs 7.5 days, P = .04) with 21 versus 10 patients discharged within 6 days (P = .01). At 6 months, forced expiratory volume in 1 second improved significantly in both study groups (0.28 vs 0.29 L) with no intergroup difference (P = .79). In both groups, forced expiratory volume in 1 second improvements lasted more than 24 months. At 36 months, freedom from contralateral treatment was 55% versus 50% (P = .5) and survival was 81% versus 87% (P = .5). Conclusions: In this randomized study, awake nonresectional lung volume reduction surgery resulted in significantly shorter hospital stay than the nonawake procedure. There were no differences between study groups in physiologic improvements, freedom from contralateral treatment, and survival. We speculate that compared with the nonawake procedure, awake lung volume reduction surgery can offer similar clinical benefit but a faster postoperative recovery.

AB - Objective: The study objective was to assess in a randomized controlled study (NCT00566839) the comparative results of awake nonresectional or nonawake resectional lung volume reduction surgery. Method: Sixty-three patients were randomly assigned by computer to receive unilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery lung volume reduction surgery by a nonresectional technique performed through epidural anesthesia in 32 awake patients (awake group) or the standard resectional technique performed through general anesthesia in 31 patients (control group). Primary outcomes were hospital stay and changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second. During follow-up, the need of contralateral treatment because of loss of postoperative benefit was considered a failure event as death. Results: Intergroup comparisons (awake vs control) showed no difference in gender, age, and body mass index. Hospital stay was shorter in the awake group (6 vs 7.5 days, P = .04) with 21 versus 10 patients discharged within 6 days (P = .01). At 6 months, forced expiratory volume in 1 second improved significantly in both study groups (0.28 vs 0.29 L) with no intergroup difference (P = .79). In both groups, forced expiratory volume in 1 second improvements lasted more than 24 months. At 36 months, freedom from contralateral treatment was 55% versus 50% (P = .5) and survival was 81% versus 87% (P = .5). Conclusions: In this randomized study, awake nonresectional lung volume reduction surgery resulted in significantly shorter hospital stay than the nonawake procedure. There were no differences between study groups in physiologic improvements, freedom from contralateral treatment, and survival. We speculate that compared with the nonawake procedure, awake lung volume reduction surgery can offer similar clinical benefit but a faster postoperative recovery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83555164922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83555164922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.09.050

DO - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.09.050

M3 - Article

C2 - 22056369

AN - SCOPUS:83555164922

VL - 143

SP - 47

EP - 54

JO - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

SN - 0022-5223

IS - 1

ER -