Randomized Phase III trial of retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide versus retinoic acid and chemotherapy in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia: Health-related quality-of-life outcomes

Fabio Efficace, Franco Mandelli, Giuseppe Avvisati, Francesco Cottone, Felicetto Ferrara, Eros Di Bona, Giorgina Specchia, Massimo Breccia, Alessandro Levis, Simona Sica, Olimpia Finizio, Maria Grazia Kropp, Giuseppe Fioritoni, Elisa Cerqui, Marco Vignetti, Sergio Amadori, Richard F. Schlenk, Uwe Platzbecker, Francesco Lo-Coco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose A randomized clinical trial compared efficacy and toxicity of standard all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) plus chemotherapy versus ATRA plus arsenic trioxide in patients with newly diagnosed, low- or intermediate-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Here, we report health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) results.

Patients and Methods HRQOL was a secondary end point of this trial. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 was used to assess HRQOL at end of induction and after consolidation therapy. All analyses were based on 156 patients who received at least one dose of treatment, with groups defined according to randomly assigned treatment. Primary analysis was performed, estimating mean HRQOL score over time and differences between treatment arms using a linear mixed model.

Results Overall, 162 patients age 18 to 70 years were enrolled. Of these, 150 and 142 patients were evaluable for HRQOL after induction therapy and third consolidation course, respectively. Overall compliance with HRQOL forms was 80.1%. The largest difference, favoring patients treated with ATRA plus arsenic trioxide, was found for fatigue severity (mean score difference, -9.3; 95% CI, -17.8 to -0.7; P = .034) at end of induction therapy. This difference was also clinically relevant. HRQOL differences between treatment arms at end of consolidation showed that for several scales, differences between treatment arms were marginal.

Conclusion Overall, current HRQOL findings further support the use of ATRA plus arsenic trioxide as preferred first-line treatment in patients with low- or intermediate-risk APL.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3406-3412
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume32
Issue number30
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 20 2014

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Efficace, F., Mandelli, F., Avvisati, G., Cottone, F., Ferrara, F., Di Bona, E., Specchia, G., Breccia, M., Levis, A., Sica, S., Finizio, O., Kropp, M. G., Fioritoni, G., Cerqui, E., Vignetti, M., Amadori, S., Schlenk, R. F., Platzbecker, U., & Lo-Coco, F. (2014). Randomized Phase III trial of retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide versus retinoic acid and chemotherapy in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia: Health-related quality-of-life outcomes. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(30), 3406-3412. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.55.3453