Randomized trial of fludarabine versus fludarabine and idarubicin as frontline treatment in patients with indolent or mantle-cell lymphoma

Pier Luigi Zinzani, Massimo Magagnoli, Luciano Moretti, Amalia De Renzo, Raffaele Battista, Alfonso Zaccaria, Luciano Guardigni, Patrizio Mazza, Roberto Marra, Fioravante Ronconi, Vito Michele Lauta, Maurizio Bendandi, Filippo Gherlinzoni, Patrizia Gentilini, Fabrizio Ciccone, Claudia Cellini, Vittorio Stefoni, Francesco Ricciuti, Marco Gobbi, Sante Tura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: A first comparative trial of fludarabine (FLU) alone versus FLU plus idarubicin (FLU-ID) for indolent or mantle-cell lymphomas. Patients and Methods: From September 1995 to July 1998, 199 patients aged 25 to 65 years (median, 54 years) with newly diagnosed stages II to IV indolent or mantle- cell lymphomas (standard risk according to the International Prognostic Index) were enrolled onto a multicenter, 1:1 randomized study. Of the 199 patients who were able to be assessed, 101 were assigned to the FLU group (six monthly cycles of FLU 25 mg/m2/d on days 1 through 5) and 98 to the FLU-ID group (six monthly cycles of FLU 25 mg/m2/d on days 1 through 3 and idarubicin 12 mg/m2 on day 1). Results: In the FLU group, complete response (CR) and partial response rates were 47% and 37%, respectively, whereas in the FLU-ID group, they were 39% and 42%, respectively. In-depth analysis of the CR rate with respect to histologic type showed that FLU seemed to be superior to FLU-ID in treating follicular lymphomas (60% v 40%, respectively), whereas FLU-ID seemed to be more effective than FLU in treating nonfollicular lymphomas (small lymphocytic, 43% v 29%, respectively; immunocytoma, 38% v 23%, respectively; P = not significant), excluding the mantle-cell subset (in which there was no difference between the two groups). No striking differences were observed between the two protocols in terms of overall response or toxicity, which was generally mild. However, with a median follow-up of 19 months, only 29 patients (62%) who received FLU alone have maintained their initial CR, compared with 32 (84%) of those who received FLU-ID therapy (P = .021). Conclusion: Although the FLU-ID regimen may not significantly improve the induction of CR in most indolent-lymphoma patients, our preliminary data do suggest that, with respect to FLU alone, it may be capable of conferring a longer-lasting CR and that it might be superior in terms of CR rate in small lymphocytic and immunocytoma subtypes. (C) 2000 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)773-779
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume18
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized trial of fludarabine versus fludarabine and idarubicin as frontline treatment in patients with indolent or mantle-cell lymphoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Zinzani, P. L., Magagnoli, M., Moretti, L., De Renzo, A., Battista, R., Zaccaria, A., Guardigni, L., Mazza, P., Marra, R., Ronconi, F., Lauta, V. M., Bendandi, M., Gherlinzoni, F., Gentilini, P., Ciccone, F., Cellini, C., Stefoni, V., Ricciuti, F., Gobbi, M., & Tura, S. (2000). Randomized trial of fludarabine versus fludarabine and idarubicin as frontline treatment in patients with indolent or mantle-cell lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18(4), 773-779.