Rapid naming deficits in dyslexia: A stumbling block for the perceptual anchor theory of dyslexia

Gloria Di Filippo, Pierluigi Zoccolotti, Johannes C. Ziegler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

According to a recent theory of dyslexia, the perceptual anchor theory, children with dyslexia show deficits in classic auditory and phonological tasks not because they have auditory or phonological impairments but because they are unable to form a 'perceptual anchor' in tasks that rely on a small set of repeated stimuli. The theory makes the strong prediction that rapid naming deficits should only be present in small sets of repeated items, not in large sets of unrepeated items. The present research tested this prediction by comparing rapid naming performance of a small set of repeated items with that of a large set of unrepeated items. The results were unequivocal. Deficits were found both for small and large sets of objects and numbers. The deficit was actually bigger for large sets than for small sets, which is the opposite of the prediction made by the anchor theory. In conclusion, the perceptual anchor theory does not provide a satisfactory account of some of the major hallmark effects of developmental dyslexia.

Original languageEnglish
JournalDevelopmental Science
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

Dyslexia
Articulation Disorders
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Rapid naming deficits in dyslexia : A stumbling block for the perceptual anchor theory of dyslexia. / Di Filippo, Gloria; Zoccolotti, Pierluigi; Ziegler, Johannes C.

In: Developmental Science, Vol. 11, No. 6, 11.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d35170b6cd6544f3817a44a187c8e2f6,
title = "Rapid naming deficits in dyslexia: A stumbling block for the perceptual anchor theory of dyslexia",
abstract = "According to a recent theory of dyslexia, the perceptual anchor theory, children with dyslexia show deficits in classic auditory and phonological tasks not because they have auditory or phonological impairments but because they are unable to form a 'perceptual anchor' in tasks that rely on a small set of repeated stimuli. The theory makes the strong prediction that rapid naming deficits should only be present in small sets of repeated items, not in large sets of unrepeated items. The present research tested this prediction by comparing rapid naming performance of a small set of repeated items with that of a large set of unrepeated items. The results were unequivocal. Deficits were found both for small and large sets of objects and numbers. The deficit was actually bigger for large sets than for small sets, which is the opposite of the prediction made by the anchor theory. In conclusion, the perceptual anchor theory does not provide a satisfactory account of some of the major hallmark effects of developmental dyslexia.",
author = "{Di Filippo}, Gloria and Pierluigi Zoccolotti and Ziegler, {Johannes C.}",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00752.x",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Developmental Science",
issn = "1363-755X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rapid naming deficits in dyslexia

T2 - A stumbling block for the perceptual anchor theory of dyslexia

AU - Di Filippo, Gloria

AU - Zoccolotti, Pierluigi

AU - Ziegler, Johannes C.

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - According to a recent theory of dyslexia, the perceptual anchor theory, children with dyslexia show deficits in classic auditory and phonological tasks not because they have auditory or phonological impairments but because they are unable to form a 'perceptual anchor' in tasks that rely on a small set of repeated stimuli. The theory makes the strong prediction that rapid naming deficits should only be present in small sets of repeated items, not in large sets of unrepeated items. The present research tested this prediction by comparing rapid naming performance of a small set of repeated items with that of a large set of unrepeated items. The results were unequivocal. Deficits were found both for small and large sets of objects and numbers. The deficit was actually bigger for large sets than for small sets, which is the opposite of the prediction made by the anchor theory. In conclusion, the perceptual anchor theory does not provide a satisfactory account of some of the major hallmark effects of developmental dyslexia.

AB - According to a recent theory of dyslexia, the perceptual anchor theory, children with dyslexia show deficits in classic auditory and phonological tasks not because they have auditory or phonological impairments but because they are unable to form a 'perceptual anchor' in tasks that rely on a small set of repeated stimuli. The theory makes the strong prediction that rapid naming deficits should only be present in small sets of repeated items, not in large sets of unrepeated items. The present research tested this prediction by comparing rapid naming performance of a small set of repeated items with that of a large set of unrepeated items. The results were unequivocal. Deficits were found both for small and large sets of objects and numbers. The deficit was actually bigger for large sets than for small sets, which is the opposite of the prediction made by the anchor theory. In conclusion, the perceptual anchor theory does not provide a satisfactory account of some of the major hallmark effects of developmental dyslexia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53949103581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53949103581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00752.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00752.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19046146

AN - SCOPUS:53949103581

VL - 11

JO - Developmental Science

JF - Developmental Science

SN - 1363-755X

IS - 6

ER -