Rasch analysis of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale: insights on dimensionality and suggestions for an improved 15-item version

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate dimensionality and the measurement properties of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale using both classical test theory and Rasch analysis methods, and to provide insights for an improved version of the questionnaire.

DESIGN: Rasch analysis of individual patient data.

SETTING: Rehabilitation centre.

PARTICIPANTS: A total of 135 patients with musculoskeletal diseases of the lower limb.

RESULTS: Patients were assessed with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale before and after the rehabilitation. Rasch analysis showed some problems related to rating scale category functioning, items fit, and items redundancy. After an iterative process, which resulted in the reduction of rating scale categories from 5 to 4, and in the deletion of 5 items, the psychometric properties of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale improved. The retained 15 items with a 4-level response format fitted the Rasch model (internal construct validity), and demonstrated unidimensionality and good reliability indices (person-separation reliability 0.92; Cronbach's alpha 0.94). Then, the analysis showed differential item functioning for six of the retained items. The sensitivity to change of the Italian 15-item Lower Extremity Functional Scale was nearly equal to the one of the original version (effect size: 0.93 and 0.98; standardized response mean: 1.20 and 1.28, respectively for the 15-item and 20-item versions).

CONCLUSION: The Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale had unsatisfactory measurement properties. However, removing five items and simplifying the scoring from 5 to 4 levels resulted in a more valid measure with good reliability and sensitivity to change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)532-543
Number of pages12
JournalClinical Rehabilitation
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Lower Extremity
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Rehabilitation Centers
Psychometrics
Rehabilitation

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Cite this

@article{e8d8347a70b94037b2e9b93403d8de0c,
title = "Rasch analysis of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale: insights on dimensionality and suggestions for an improved 15-item version",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To investigate dimensionality and the measurement properties of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale using both classical test theory and Rasch analysis methods, and to provide insights for an improved version of the questionnaire.DESIGN: Rasch analysis of individual patient data.SETTING: Rehabilitation centre.PARTICIPANTS: A total of 135 patients with musculoskeletal diseases of the lower limb.RESULTS: Patients were assessed with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale before and after the rehabilitation. Rasch analysis showed some problems related to rating scale category functioning, items fit, and items redundancy. After an iterative process, which resulted in the reduction of rating scale categories from 5 to 4, and in the deletion of 5 items, the psychometric properties of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale improved. The retained 15 items with a 4-level response format fitted the Rasch model (internal construct validity), and demonstrated unidimensionality and good reliability indices (person-separation reliability 0.92; Cronbach's alpha 0.94). Then, the analysis showed differential item functioning for six of the retained items. The sensitivity to change of the Italian 15-item Lower Extremity Functional Scale was nearly equal to the one of the original version (effect size: 0.93 and 0.98; standardized response mean: 1.20 and 1.28, respectively for the 15-item and 20-item versions).CONCLUSION: The Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale had unsatisfactory measurement properties. However, removing five items and simplifying the scoring from 5 to 4 levels resulted in a more valid measure with good reliability and sensitivity to change.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Elisabetta Bravini and Andrea Giordano and Francesco Sartorio and Giorgio Ferriero and Stefano Vercelli",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0269215516647180",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "532--543",
journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd STM",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rasch analysis of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale

T2 - insights on dimensionality and suggestions for an improved 15-item version

AU - Bravini, Elisabetta

AU - Giordano, Andrea

AU - Sartorio, Francesco

AU - Ferriero, Giorgio

AU - Vercelli, Stefano

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To investigate dimensionality and the measurement properties of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale using both classical test theory and Rasch analysis methods, and to provide insights for an improved version of the questionnaire.DESIGN: Rasch analysis of individual patient data.SETTING: Rehabilitation centre.PARTICIPANTS: A total of 135 patients with musculoskeletal diseases of the lower limb.RESULTS: Patients were assessed with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale before and after the rehabilitation. Rasch analysis showed some problems related to rating scale category functioning, items fit, and items redundancy. After an iterative process, which resulted in the reduction of rating scale categories from 5 to 4, and in the deletion of 5 items, the psychometric properties of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale improved. The retained 15 items with a 4-level response format fitted the Rasch model (internal construct validity), and demonstrated unidimensionality and good reliability indices (person-separation reliability 0.92; Cronbach's alpha 0.94). Then, the analysis showed differential item functioning for six of the retained items. The sensitivity to change of the Italian 15-item Lower Extremity Functional Scale was nearly equal to the one of the original version (effect size: 0.93 and 0.98; standardized response mean: 1.20 and 1.28, respectively for the 15-item and 20-item versions).CONCLUSION: The Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale had unsatisfactory measurement properties. However, removing five items and simplifying the scoring from 5 to 4 levels resulted in a more valid measure with good reliability and sensitivity to change.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To investigate dimensionality and the measurement properties of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale using both classical test theory and Rasch analysis methods, and to provide insights for an improved version of the questionnaire.DESIGN: Rasch analysis of individual patient data.SETTING: Rehabilitation centre.PARTICIPANTS: A total of 135 patients with musculoskeletal diseases of the lower limb.RESULTS: Patients were assessed with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale before and after the rehabilitation. Rasch analysis showed some problems related to rating scale category functioning, items fit, and items redundancy. After an iterative process, which resulted in the reduction of rating scale categories from 5 to 4, and in the deletion of 5 items, the psychometric properties of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale improved. The retained 15 items with a 4-level response format fitted the Rasch model (internal construct validity), and demonstrated unidimensionality and good reliability indices (person-separation reliability 0.92; Cronbach's alpha 0.94). Then, the analysis showed differential item functioning for six of the retained items. The sensitivity to change of the Italian 15-item Lower Extremity Functional Scale was nearly equal to the one of the original version (effect size: 0.93 and 0.98; standardized response mean: 1.20 and 1.28, respectively for the 15-item and 20-item versions).CONCLUSION: The Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale had unsatisfactory measurement properties. However, removing five items and simplifying the scoring from 5 to 4 levels resulted in a more valid measure with good reliability and sensitivity to change.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1177/0269215516647180

DO - 10.1177/0269215516647180

M3 - Article

C2 - 27141086

VL - 31

SP - 532

EP - 543

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

SN - 0269-2155

IS - 4

ER -