Rate of reintubation in mechanically ventilated neurosurgical and neurologic patients: Evaluation of a systematic approach to weaning and extubation

Paolo Navalesi, Pamela Frigerio, Maria Pia Moretti, Maurizio Sommariva, Sergio Vesconi, Paola Baiardi, Anna Levati

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: To assess whether a systematic approach to weaning and extubation (intervention) is superior to the sole physician's judgment (control) in preventing reintubation secondary to extubation failure in patients with neurologic disorders. DESIGN:: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING:: Intensive care unit of a large teaching hospital. PATIENTS:: Three hundred eighteen intubated patients who had been receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 12 hrs and were able to trigger the ventilator. INTERVENTIONS:: Patients were randomized to the intervention (n = 165) or control group (n = 153). MEASUREMENTS:: Rate of reintubation after extubation failure occurring within 48 hrs (primary end point). Duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit stay, mortality, rate of tracheotomy (secondary end points). The perception of the research protocol by the intensive care unit staff was also assessed. MAIN RESULTS:: The rate of reintubation was lower in the intervention (5%) than in the control (12.5%) group (p = 0.047). There was no difference in any of the other outcome variables (secondary end points). Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II (adjusted odds ratio 1.042 per unit; 95% confidence interval 1.006-1.080; p = 0.022) and inclusion in the control group (adjusted odds ratio 2.393; 95% confidence interval 1.000-5.726; p = 0.05) were the only two independent predictive factors for the risk of extubation failure. The protocol was felt by the staff to determine an improvement in patients' clinical outcome, but to increase intensive care unit workload; nurses and physiotherapists considered its impact on their professional role more positively than physicians. CONCLUSIONS:: In patients with neurologic diseases, a systematic approach to weaning and extubation reduces the rate of reintubation secondary to extubation failure without affecting the duration of mechanical ventilation, and is overall positively perceived by intensive care unit professionals. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: On completion of this article, the reader should be able to:The authors have disclosed that they have no financial relationships with or interests in any commercial companies pertaining to this educational activity.All faculty and staff in a position to control the content of this CME activity have disclosed that they have no financial relationship with, or financial interests in, any commercial companies pertaining to this educational activity.Lippincott CME Institute, Inc., has identified and resolved all faculty conflicts of interest regarding this educational activity.Visit the Critical Care Medicine Web Site (www.ccmjournal.org) for information on obtaining continuing medical education credit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2986-2992
Number of pages7
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume36
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

Weaning
Nervous System
Intensive Care Units
Artificial Respiration
Nervous System Diseases
Education
Control Groups
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Physicians
Professional Role
Conflict of Interest
Continuing Medical Education
Tracheotomy
Physical Therapists
Mechanical Ventilators
Critical Care
Workload
Teaching Hospitals
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • Extubation failure
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Neurologic disorders
  • Neurosurgery
  • Randomized clinical trial
  • Weaning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Rate of reintubation in mechanically ventilated neurosurgical and neurologic patients : Evaluation of a systematic approach to weaning and extubation. / Navalesi, Paolo; Frigerio, Pamela; Moretti, Maria Pia; Sommariva, Maurizio; Vesconi, Sergio; Baiardi, Paola; Levati, Anna.

In: Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 11, 11.2008, p. 2986-2992.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Navalesi, Paolo ; Frigerio, Pamela ; Moretti, Maria Pia ; Sommariva, Maurizio ; Vesconi, Sergio ; Baiardi, Paola ; Levati, Anna. / Rate of reintubation in mechanically ventilated neurosurgical and neurologic patients : Evaluation of a systematic approach to weaning and extubation. In: Critical Care Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 36, No. 11. pp. 2986-2992.
@article{a6a0cc3356544f408f38ba93b72d2e92,
title = "Rate of reintubation in mechanically ventilated neurosurgical and neurologic patients: Evaluation of a systematic approach to weaning and extubation",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE:: To assess whether a systematic approach to weaning and extubation (intervention) is superior to the sole physician's judgment (control) in preventing reintubation secondary to extubation failure in patients with neurologic disorders. DESIGN:: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING:: Intensive care unit of a large teaching hospital. PATIENTS:: Three hundred eighteen intubated patients who had been receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 12 hrs and were able to trigger the ventilator. INTERVENTIONS:: Patients were randomized to the intervention (n = 165) or control group (n = 153). MEASUREMENTS:: Rate of reintubation after extubation failure occurring within 48 hrs (primary end point). Duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit stay, mortality, rate of tracheotomy (secondary end points). The perception of the research protocol by the intensive care unit staff was also assessed. MAIN RESULTS:: The rate of reintubation was lower in the intervention (5{\%}) than in the control (12.5{\%}) group (p = 0.047). There was no difference in any of the other outcome variables (secondary end points). Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II (adjusted odds ratio 1.042 per unit; 95{\%} confidence interval 1.006-1.080; p = 0.022) and inclusion in the control group (adjusted odds ratio 2.393; 95{\%} confidence interval 1.000-5.726; p = 0.05) were the only two independent predictive factors for the risk of extubation failure. The protocol was felt by the staff to determine an improvement in patients' clinical outcome, but to increase intensive care unit workload; nurses and physiotherapists considered its impact on their professional role more positively than physicians. CONCLUSIONS:: In patients with neurologic diseases, a systematic approach to weaning and extubation reduces the rate of reintubation secondary to extubation failure without affecting the duration of mechanical ventilation, and is overall positively perceived by intensive care unit professionals. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: On completion of this article, the reader should be able to:The authors have disclosed that they have no financial relationships with or interests in any commercial companies pertaining to this educational activity.All faculty and staff in a position to control the content of this CME activity have disclosed that they have no financial relationship with, or financial interests in, any commercial companies pertaining to this educational activity.Lippincott CME Institute, Inc., has identified and resolved all faculty conflicts of interest regarding this educational activity.Visit the Critical Care Medicine Web Site (www.ccmjournal.org) for information on obtaining continuing medical education credit.",
keywords = "Extubation failure, Mechanical ventilation, Neurologic disorders, Neurosurgery, Randomized clinical trial, Weaning",
author = "Paolo Navalesi and Pamela Frigerio and Moretti, {Maria Pia} and Maurizio Sommariva and Sergio Vesconi and Paola Baiardi and Anna Levati",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/CCM.0b013e31818b35f2",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "2986--2992",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rate of reintubation in mechanically ventilated neurosurgical and neurologic patients

T2 - Evaluation of a systematic approach to weaning and extubation

AU - Navalesi, Paolo

AU - Frigerio, Pamela

AU - Moretti, Maria Pia

AU - Sommariva, Maurizio

AU - Vesconi, Sergio

AU - Baiardi, Paola

AU - Levati, Anna

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - OBJECTIVE:: To assess whether a systematic approach to weaning and extubation (intervention) is superior to the sole physician's judgment (control) in preventing reintubation secondary to extubation failure in patients with neurologic disorders. DESIGN:: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING:: Intensive care unit of a large teaching hospital. PATIENTS:: Three hundred eighteen intubated patients who had been receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 12 hrs and were able to trigger the ventilator. INTERVENTIONS:: Patients were randomized to the intervention (n = 165) or control group (n = 153). MEASUREMENTS:: Rate of reintubation after extubation failure occurring within 48 hrs (primary end point). Duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit stay, mortality, rate of tracheotomy (secondary end points). The perception of the research protocol by the intensive care unit staff was also assessed. MAIN RESULTS:: The rate of reintubation was lower in the intervention (5%) than in the control (12.5%) group (p = 0.047). There was no difference in any of the other outcome variables (secondary end points). Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II (adjusted odds ratio 1.042 per unit; 95% confidence interval 1.006-1.080; p = 0.022) and inclusion in the control group (adjusted odds ratio 2.393; 95% confidence interval 1.000-5.726; p = 0.05) were the only two independent predictive factors for the risk of extubation failure. The protocol was felt by the staff to determine an improvement in patients' clinical outcome, but to increase intensive care unit workload; nurses and physiotherapists considered its impact on their professional role more positively than physicians. CONCLUSIONS:: In patients with neurologic diseases, a systematic approach to weaning and extubation reduces the rate of reintubation secondary to extubation failure without affecting the duration of mechanical ventilation, and is overall positively perceived by intensive care unit professionals. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: On completion of this article, the reader should be able to:The authors have disclosed that they have no financial relationships with or interests in any commercial companies pertaining to this educational activity.All faculty and staff in a position to control the content of this CME activity have disclosed that they have no financial relationship with, or financial interests in, any commercial companies pertaining to this educational activity.Lippincott CME Institute, Inc., has identified and resolved all faculty conflicts of interest regarding this educational activity.Visit the Critical Care Medicine Web Site (www.ccmjournal.org) for information on obtaining continuing medical education credit.

AB - OBJECTIVE:: To assess whether a systematic approach to weaning and extubation (intervention) is superior to the sole physician's judgment (control) in preventing reintubation secondary to extubation failure in patients with neurologic disorders. DESIGN:: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING:: Intensive care unit of a large teaching hospital. PATIENTS:: Three hundred eighteen intubated patients who had been receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 12 hrs and were able to trigger the ventilator. INTERVENTIONS:: Patients were randomized to the intervention (n = 165) or control group (n = 153). MEASUREMENTS:: Rate of reintubation after extubation failure occurring within 48 hrs (primary end point). Duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit stay, mortality, rate of tracheotomy (secondary end points). The perception of the research protocol by the intensive care unit staff was also assessed. MAIN RESULTS:: The rate of reintubation was lower in the intervention (5%) than in the control (12.5%) group (p = 0.047). There was no difference in any of the other outcome variables (secondary end points). Simplified Acute Physiologic Score II (adjusted odds ratio 1.042 per unit; 95% confidence interval 1.006-1.080; p = 0.022) and inclusion in the control group (adjusted odds ratio 2.393; 95% confidence interval 1.000-5.726; p = 0.05) were the only two independent predictive factors for the risk of extubation failure. The protocol was felt by the staff to determine an improvement in patients' clinical outcome, but to increase intensive care unit workload; nurses and physiotherapists considered its impact on their professional role more positively than physicians. CONCLUSIONS:: In patients with neurologic diseases, a systematic approach to weaning and extubation reduces the rate of reintubation secondary to extubation failure without affecting the duration of mechanical ventilation, and is overall positively perceived by intensive care unit professionals. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: On completion of this article, the reader should be able to:The authors have disclosed that they have no financial relationships with or interests in any commercial companies pertaining to this educational activity.All faculty and staff in a position to control the content of this CME activity have disclosed that they have no financial relationship with, or financial interests in, any commercial companies pertaining to this educational activity.Lippincott CME Institute, Inc., has identified and resolved all faculty conflicts of interest regarding this educational activity.Visit the Critical Care Medicine Web Site (www.ccmjournal.org) for information on obtaining continuing medical education credit.

KW - Extubation failure

KW - Mechanical ventilation

KW - Neurologic disorders

KW - Neurosurgery

KW - Randomized clinical trial

KW - Weaning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56049088982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56049088982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31818b35f2

DO - 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31818b35f2

M3 - Article

C2 - 18824909

AN - SCOPUS:56049088982

VL - 36

SP - 2986

EP - 2992

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 11

ER -