Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF

Renato P. Ricci, Antonio D'Onofrio, Luigi Padeletti, Antonio Sagone, Alfredo Vicentini, Antonio Vincenti, Loredana Morichelli, Ciro Cavallaro, Giuseppe Ricciardi, Leonida Lombardi, Antonio Fusco, Giovanni Rovaris, Paolo Silvestri, Tiziana Guidotto, Annalisa Pollastrelli, Massimo Santini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AimsThe aims of the study are to develop a cost-minimization analysis from the hospital perspective and a cost-effectiveness analysis from the third payer standpoint, based on direct estimates of costs and QOL associated with remote follow-ups, using Merlinhome and Merlin.net, compared with standard ambulatory follow-ups, in the management of ICD and CRT-D recipients.Methods and resultsRemote monitoring systems can replace ambulatory follow-ups, sparing human and economic resources, and increasing patient safety. TARIFF is a prospective, controlled, observational study aimed at measuring the direct and indirect costs and quality of life (QOL) of all participants by a 1-year economic evaluation. A detailed set of hospitalized and ambulatory healthcare costs and losses of productivity that could be directly influenced by the different means of follow-ups will be collected. The study consists of two phases, each including 100 patients, to measure the economic resources consumed during the first phase, associated with standard ambulatory follow-ups, vs. the second phase, associated with remote follow-ups.ConclusionRemote monitoring systems enable caregivers to better ensure patient safety and the healthcare to limit costs. TARIFF will allow defining the economic value of remote ICD follow-ups for Italian hospitals, third payers, and patients. The TARIFF study, based on a cost-minimization analysis, directly comparing remote follow-up with standard ambulatory visits, will validate the cost effectiveness of the Merlin.net technology, and define a proper reimbursement schedule applicable for the Italian healthcare system.Trial registration: NCT01075516.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1661-1665
Number of pages5
JournalEuropace
Volume14
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Cost-Benefit Analysis
Registries
Costs and Cost Analysis
Neurofibromin 2
Health
Economics
Patient Safety
Quality of Life
Delivery of Health Care
Health Care Costs
Caregivers
Observational Studies
Appointments and Schedules
Technology

Keywords

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • Remote monitoring
  • Telemedicine
  • Telemonitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Ricci, R. P., D'Onofrio, A., Padeletti, L., Sagone, A., Vicentini, A., Vincenti, A., ... Santini, M. (2012). Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF. Europace, 14(11), 1661-1665. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus093

Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up : TARIFF. / Ricci, Renato P.; D'Onofrio, Antonio; Padeletti, Luigi; Sagone, Antonio; Vicentini, Alfredo; Vincenti, Antonio; Morichelli, Loredana; Cavallaro, Ciro; Ricciardi, Giuseppe; Lombardi, Leonida; Fusco, Antonio; Rovaris, Giovanni; Silvestri, Paolo; Guidotto, Tiziana; Pollastrelli, Annalisa; Santini, Massimo.

In: Europace, Vol. 14, No. 11, 11.2012, p. 1661-1665.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ricci, RP, D'Onofrio, A, Padeletti, L, Sagone, A, Vicentini, A, Vincenti, A, Morichelli, L, Cavallaro, C, Ricciardi, G, Lombardi, L, Fusco, A, Rovaris, G, Silvestri, P, Guidotto, T, Pollastrelli, A & Santini, M 2012, 'Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF', Europace, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1661-1665. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus093
Ricci RP, D'Onofrio A, Padeletti L, Sagone A, Vicentini A, Vincenti A et al. Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF. Europace. 2012 Nov;14(11):1661-1665. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus093
Ricci, Renato P. ; D'Onofrio, Antonio ; Padeletti, Luigi ; Sagone, Antonio ; Vicentini, Alfredo ; Vincenti, Antonio ; Morichelli, Loredana ; Cavallaro, Ciro ; Ricciardi, Giuseppe ; Lombardi, Leonida ; Fusco, Antonio ; Rovaris, Giovanni ; Silvestri, Paolo ; Guidotto, Tiziana ; Pollastrelli, Annalisa ; Santini, Massimo. / Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up : TARIFF. In: Europace. 2012 ; Vol. 14, No. 11. pp. 1661-1665.
@article{6aeec688589e497ea3ce2677ac542710,
title = "Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF",
abstract = "AimsThe aims of the study are to develop a cost-minimization analysis from the hospital perspective and a cost-effectiveness analysis from the third payer standpoint, based on direct estimates of costs and QOL associated with remote follow-ups, using Merlinhome and Merlin.net, compared with standard ambulatory follow-ups, in the management of ICD and CRT-D recipients.Methods and resultsRemote monitoring systems can replace ambulatory follow-ups, sparing human and economic resources, and increasing patient safety. TARIFF is a prospective, controlled, observational study aimed at measuring the direct and indirect costs and quality of life (QOL) of all participants by a 1-year economic evaluation. A detailed set of hospitalized and ambulatory healthcare costs and losses of productivity that could be directly influenced by the different means of follow-ups will be collected. The study consists of two phases, each including 100 patients, to measure the economic resources consumed during the first phase, associated with standard ambulatory follow-ups, vs. the second phase, associated with remote follow-ups.ConclusionRemote monitoring systems enable caregivers to better ensure patient safety and the healthcare to limit costs. TARIFF will allow defining the economic value of remote ICD follow-ups for Italian hospitals, third payers, and patients. The TARIFF study, based on a cost-minimization analysis, directly comparing remote follow-up with standard ambulatory visits, will validate the cost effectiveness of the Merlin.net technology, and define a proper reimbursement schedule applicable for the Italian healthcare system.Trial registration: NCT01075516.",
keywords = "Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, Remote monitoring, Telemedicine, Telemonitoring",
author = "Ricci, {Renato P.} and Antonio D'Onofrio and Luigi Padeletti and Antonio Sagone and Alfredo Vicentini and Antonio Vincenti and Loredana Morichelli and Ciro Cavallaro and Giuseppe Ricciardi and Leonida Lombardi and Antonio Fusco and Giovanni Rovaris and Paolo Silvestri and Tiziana Guidotto and Annalisa Pollastrelli and Massimo Santini",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1093/europace/eus093",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1661--1665",
journal = "Europace",
issn = "1099-5129",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up

T2 - TARIFF

AU - Ricci, Renato P.

AU - D'Onofrio, Antonio

AU - Padeletti, Luigi

AU - Sagone, Antonio

AU - Vicentini, Alfredo

AU - Vincenti, Antonio

AU - Morichelli, Loredana

AU - Cavallaro, Ciro

AU - Ricciardi, Giuseppe

AU - Lombardi, Leonida

AU - Fusco, Antonio

AU - Rovaris, Giovanni

AU - Silvestri, Paolo

AU - Guidotto, Tiziana

AU - Pollastrelli, Annalisa

AU - Santini, Massimo

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - AimsThe aims of the study are to develop a cost-minimization analysis from the hospital perspective and a cost-effectiveness analysis from the third payer standpoint, based on direct estimates of costs and QOL associated with remote follow-ups, using Merlinhome and Merlin.net, compared with standard ambulatory follow-ups, in the management of ICD and CRT-D recipients.Methods and resultsRemote monitoring systems can replace ambulatory follow-ups, sparing human and economic resources, and increasing patient safety. TARIFF is a prospective, controlled, observational study aimed at measuring the direct and indirect costs and quality of life (QOL) of all participants by a 1-year economic evaluation. A detailed set of hospitalized and ambulatory healthcare costs and losses of productivity that could be directly influenced by the different means of follow-ups will be collected. The study consists of two phases, each including 100 patients, to measure the economic resources consumed during the first phase, associated with standard ambulatory follow-ups, vs. the second phase, associated with remote follow-ups.ConclusionRemote monitoring systems enable caregivers to better ensure patient safety and the healthcare to limit costs. TARIFF will allow defining the economic value of remote ICD follow-ups for Italian hospitals, third payers, and patients. The TARIFF study, based on a cost-minimization analysis, directly comparing remote follow-up with standard ambulatory visits, will validate the cost effectiveness of the Merlin.net technology, and define a proper reimbursement schedule applicable for the Italian healthcare system.Trial registration: NCT01075516.

AB - AimsThe aims of the study are to develop a cost-minimization analysis from the hospital perspective and a cost-effectiveness analysis from the third payer standpoint, based on direct estimates of costs and QOL associated with remote follow-ups, using Merlinhome and Merlin.net, compared with standard ambulatory follow-ups, in the management of ICD and CRT-D recipients.Methods and resultsRemote monitoring systems can replace ambulatory follow-ups, sparing human and economic resources, and increasing patient safety. TARIFF is a prospective, controlled, observational study aimed at measuring the direct and indirect costs and quality of life (QOL) of all participants by a 1-year economic evaluation. A detailed set of hospitalized and ambulatory healthcare costs and losses of productivity that could be directly influenced by the different means of follow-ups will be collected. The study consists of two phases, each including 100 patients, to measure the economic resources consumed during the first phase, associated with standard ambulatory follow-ups, vs. the second phase, associated with remote follow-ups.ConclusionRemote monitoring systems enable caregivers to better ensure patient safety and the healthcare to limit costs. TARIFF will allow defining the economic value of remote ICD follow-ups for Italian hospitals, third payers, and patients. The TARIFF study, based on a cost-minimization analysis, directly comparing remote follow-up with standard ambulatory visits, will validate the cost effectiveness of the Merlin.net technology, and define a proper reimbursement schedule applicable for the Italian healthcare system.Trial registration: NCT01075516.

KW - Cardiac resynchronization therapy

KW - Implantable cardioverter defibrillator

KW - Remote monitoring

KW - Telemedicine

KW - Telemonitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868529547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868529547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/europace/eus093

DO - 10.1093/europace/eus093

M3 - Article

C2 - 22544910

AN - SCOPUS:84868529547

VL - 14

SP - 1661

EP - 1665

JO - Europace

JF - Europace

SN - 1099-5129

IS - 11

ER -