Re-use of explanted osteosynthesis devices: A reliable and inexpensive reprocessing protocol

Valentina Danesi, Luca Cristofolini, Susanna Stea, Francesco Traina, Alina Beraudi, Luca Tersi, Melinda Harman, Marco Viceconti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Orthopaedic surgical treatments emphasizing immobilization using open reduction and internal fixation with osteosynthesis devices are widely accepted for their efficacy in treating complex fractures and reducing permanent musculoskeletal deformity. However, such treatments are profoundly underutilized in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), partially due to inadequate availability of the costly osteosynthesis devices. Orthopaedic surgeons in some LMIC regularly re-use osteosynthesis devices in an effort to meet treatment demands, even though such devices typically are regulated for single-use only. The purpose of this study is to report a reprocessing protocol applied to explanted osteosynthesis devices obtained at a leading trauma care hospital. Methods: Explanted osteosynthesis devices were identified through a Register of Explanted Orthopaedic Prostheses. Guidelines to handle ethical issues were approved by the local Ethical Committee and informed patient consent was obtained at the time of explant surgery. Primary acceptance criteria were established and applied to osteosynthesis devices explanted between 2005 and 2008. A rigorous protocol for conducting decontamination and visual inspection based on specific screening criteria was implemented using simple equipment that is readily available in LMIC. Results: A total of 2050 osteosynthesis devices, including a large variety of plates, screws and staples, were reprocessed using the decontamination and inspection protocols. The acceptance rate was 66%. Estimated labour time and implementation time of the protocol to reprocess a typical osteosynthesis unit (1 plate and 5 screws) was 25 min, with an estimated fixed cost (in Italy) of 10 per unit for implementing the protocol, plus an additional 5 for final sterilization at the end-user hospital site. Discussion: This study was motivated by the treatment demands encountered by orthopaedic surgeons providing medical treatment in several different LMIC and their need for access to basic osteosynthesis devices. The rigorous decontamination protocol and generalized inspection criteria proved useful for efficiently screening a large volume of devices. Given that re-used osteosynthesis devices can yield satisfactory results, this study addresses potential complications of re-used devices and valid concerns that relate to patient safety. Implementing this defined reprocessing protocol into existing re-use practises in LMIC helps to limit the risks of inadequate sterilization and structural failure without adding additional risks to patients receiving re-used devices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1101-1106
Number of pages6
JournalInjury
Volume42
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011

Keywords

  • Bone
  • Explanted medical device
  • Fixation device
  • Fracture
  • Musculoskeletal deformity
  • Open reduction and internal fixation
  • Osteosynethesis
  • Reprocessing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Re-use of explanted osteosynthesis devices: A reliable and inexpensive reprocessing protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this