L'ecografia in tempo reale, con mezzo di contrasto, in radiologia d'urgenza

Translated title of the contribution: Real-time, contrast-enhanced sonographic imaging in emergency radiology

Orlando Catalano, Roberto Lobianco, Fabio Sandomenico, Mauro Mattace Raso, Alfredo Siani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose. To report our pilot experience in the evaluation of traumatic and nontraumatic emergencies with contrast-specific, continuous-mode sonography (US) and a second-generation contrast medium. Materials and methods. Between January 2002 and December 2003 we evaluated 126 acute patients by using real-time contrast-specific US: blunt abdominal trauma (76 cases), penetrating abdominal trauma (3), blunt scrotal trauma (1), right upper abdominal pain (10), left upper abdominal pain (9), epigastric pain (2), flank pain (5), right lower abdominal pain (2), scrotal pain (7), postoperative abdominal sepsis (1), post-biopsy haemorrhage (1), ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (8), postsurgical aortic bleeding (1). In all cases the radiologist performed a complete baseline US survey and then decided whether or not to add a contrast-enhanced examination. Results. All contrast-enhanced sonographic studies were completed proving to be adequate for diagnostic purposes and without adverse reactions to contrast medium. There were 40 true negatives. The final diagnosis, obtained in 85 positive cases out of 86, was: splenic injury (28 cases), hepatic injury (3), renal injury (3), multiple injuries (3), pancreatic and portal vein injury (1), colonic-mesocolic injury (1), testicular trauma (1), hepatic abscess (9), hepatic ischaemia (1), gangrenous cholecystitis (1), splenic infarction (8), splenic haematoma abscess (1), renal infection (4), renal infarction (1), necrotizing pancreatitis (1), post-biopsy haemorrhage (1), appendicitis (2), peritoneal abscesses (1), testicular torsion (6), orchiepididymitis (1), iliac artery dissection (1), ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (6), aortic periprosthetic hemorrhage (1). Out of 85 positive cases, agreement between baseline US and contrast-specific US was absent in 8% of cases, low in 26%, intermediate in 42%, and high in 24%. Baseline US had 3 false positives. Relevance of contrast-specific US was absent in 17% of cases, low (additional data not relevant for patient management) in 26%, intermediate (relevant additional data not modifying patient management) in 34%, and high (additional data modifying patient management) in 23%. Agreement between contrast-specific US and the gold standards was absent in 0% of cases, low in 6%, intermediate in 38%, and high in 56%. Contrast-specific US had 2 false positive results. Conclusions. Real-time contrast-specific US is an effective technique in emergency imaging. Its role should not be considered as a replacement of CT (though in some instances it can be considered a valuable alternative) but as a useful integration of conventional US. By always having the opportunity to add contrast-enhanced imaging, in case of interpretation doubts or diagnostic difficulties, the radiologist can assess the emergency patient with improved confidence and skill.

Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)454-469
Number of pages16
JournalRadiologia Medica
Volume108
Issue number5-6
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2004

Fingerprint

Radiology
Emergencies
Wounds and Injuries
Abdominal Pain
Hemorrhage
Aortic Rupture
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Kidney
Abscess
Contrast Media
Splenic Infarction
Spermatic Cord Torsion
Flank Pain
Biopsy
Liver Abscess
Cholecystitis
Iliac Artery
Multiple Trauma
Liver
Appendicitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

L'ecografia in tempo reale, con mezzo di contrasto, in radiologia d'urgenza. / Catalano, Orlando; Lobianco, Roberto; Sandomenico, Fabio; Mattace Raso, Mauro; Siani, Alfredo.

In: Radiologia Medica, Vol. 108, No. 5-6, 11.2004, p. 454-469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Catalano, O, Lobianco, R, Sandomenico, F, Mattace Raso, M & Siani, A 2004, 'L'ecografia in tempo reale, con mezzo di contrasto, in radiologia d'urgenza', Radiologia Medica, vol. 108, no. 5-6, pp. 454-469.
Catalano, Orlando ; Lobianco, Roberto ; Sandomenico, Fabio ; Mattace Raso, Mauro ; Siani, Alfredo. / L'ecografia in tempo reale, con mezzo di contrasto, in radiologia d'urgenza. In: Radiologia Medica. 2004 ; Vol. 108, No. 5-6. pp. 454-469.
@article{be4cb66a88f24533b73ce82f21934aeb,
title = "L'ecografia in tempo reale, con mezzo di contrasto, in radiologia d'urgenza",
abstract = "Purpose. To report our pilot experience in the evaluation of traumatic and nontraumatic emergencies with contrast-specific, continuous-mode sonography (US) and a second-generation contrast medium. Materials and methods. Between January 2002 and December 2003 we evaluated 126 acute patients by using real-time contrast-specific US: blunt abdominal trauma (76 cases), penetrating abdominal trauma (3), blunt scrotal trauma (1), right upper abdominal pain (10), left upper abdominal pain (9), epigastric pain (2), flank pain (5), right lower abdominal pain (2), scrotal pain (7), postoperative abdominal sepsis (1), post-biopsy haemorrhage (1), ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (8), postsurgical aortic bleeding (1). In all cases the radiologist performed a complete baseline US survey and then decided whether or not to add a contrast-enhanced examination. Results. All contrast-enhanced sonographic studies were completed proving to be adequate for diagnostic purposes and without adverse reactions to contrast medium. There were 40 true negatives. The final diagnosis, obtained in 85 positive cases out of 86, was: splenic injury (28 cases), hepatic injury (3), renal injury (3), multiple injuries (3), pancreatic and portal vein injury (1), colonic-mesocolic injury (1), testicular trauma (1), hepatic abscess (9), hepatic ischaemia (1), gangrenous cholecystitis (1), splenic infarction (8), splenic haematoma abscess (1), renal infection (4), renal infarction (1), necrotizing pancreatitis (1), post-biopsy haemorrhage (1), appendicitis (2), peritoneal abscesses (1), testicular torsion (6), orchiepididymitis (1), iliac artery dissection (1), ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (6), aortic periprosthetic hemorrhage (1). Out of 85 positive cases, agreement between baseline US and contrast-specific US was absent in 8{\%} of cases, low in 26{\%}, intermediate in 42{\%}, and high in 24{\%}. Baseline US had 3 false positives. Relevance of contrast-specific US was absent in 17{\%} of cases, low (additional data not relevant for patient management) in 26{\%}, intermediate (relevant additional data not modifying patient management) in 34{\%}, and high (additional data modifying patient management) in 23{\%}. Agreement between contrast-specific US and the gold standards was absent in 0{\%} of cases, low in 6{\%}, intermediate in 38{\%}, and high in 56{\%}. Contrast-specific US had 2 false positive results. Conclusions. Real-time contrast-specific US is an effective technique in emergency imaging. Its role should not be considered as a replacement of CT (though in some instances it can be considered a valuable alternative) but as a useful integration of conventional US. By always having the opportunity to add contrast-enhanced imaging, in case of interpretation doubts or diagnostic difficulties, the radiologist can assess the emergency patient with improved confidence and skill.",
keywords = "Abdomen, Contrast media, Nontraumatic emergencies, Scrotum, Sonography, Trauma",
author = "Orlando Catalano and Roberto Lobianco and Fabio Sandomenico and {Mattace Raso}, Mauro and Alfredo Siani",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
language = "Italian",
volume = "108",
pages = "454--469",
journal = "Radiologia Medica",
issn = "0033-8362",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.",
number = "5-6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - L'ecografia in tempo reale, con mezzo di contrasto, in radiologia d'urgenza

AU - Catalano, Orlando

AU - Lobianco, Roberto

AU - Sandomenico, Fabio

AU - Mattace Raso, Mauro

AU - Siani, Alfredo

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - Purpose. To report our pilot experience in the evaluation of traumatic and nontraumatic emergencies with contrast-specific, continuous-mode sonography (US) and a second-generation contrast medium. Materials and methods. Between January 2002 and December 2003 we evaluated 126 acute patients by using real-time contrast-specific US: blunt abdominal trauma (76 cases), penetrating abdominal trauma (3), blunt scrotal trauma (1), right upper abdominal pain (10), left upper abdominal pain (9), epigastric pain (2), flank pain (5), right lower abdominal pain (2), scrotal pain (7), postoperative abdominal sepsis (1), post-biopsy haemorrhage (1), ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (8), postsurgical aortic bleeding (1). In all cases the radiologist performed a complete baseline US survey and then decided whether or not to add a contrast-enhanced examination. Results. All contrast-enhanced sonographic studies were completed proving to be adequate for diagnostic purposes and without adverse reactions to contrast medium. There were 40 true negatives. The final diagnosis, obtained in 85 positive cases out of 86, was: splenic injury (28 cases), hepatic injury (3), renal injury (3), multiple injuries (3), pancreatic and portal vein injury (1), colonic-mesocolic injury (1), testicular trauma (1), hepatic abscess (9), hepatic ischaemia (1), gangrenous cholecystitis (1), splenic infarction (8), splenic haematoma abscess (1), renal infection (4), renal infarction (1), necrotizing pancreatitis (1), post-biopsy haemorrhage (1), appendicitis (2), peritoneal abscesses (1), testicular torsion (6), orchiepididymitis (1), iliac artery dissection (1), ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (6), aortic periprosthetic hemorrhage (1). Out of 85 positive cases, agreement between baseline US and contrast-specific US was absent in 8% of cases, low in 26%, intermediate in 42%, and high in 24%. Baseline US had 3 false positives. Relevance of contrast-specific US was absent in 17% of cases, low (additional data not relevant for patient management) in 26%, intermediate (relevant additional data not modifying patient management) in 34%, and high (additional data modifying patient management) in 23%. Agreement between contrast-specific US and the gold standards was absent in 0% of cases, low in 6%, intermediate in 38%, and high in 56%. Contrast-specific US had 2 false positive results. Conclusions. Real-time contrast-specific US is an effective technique in emergency imaging. Its role should not be considered as a replacement of CT (though in some instances it can be considered a valuable alternative) but as a useful integration of conventional US. By always having the opportunity to add contrast-enhanced imaging, in case of interpretation doubts or diagnostic difficulties, the radiologist can assess the emergency patient with improved confidence and skill.

AB - Purpose. To report our pilot experience in the evaluation of traumatic and nontraumatic emergencies with contrast-specific, continuous-mode sonography (US) and a second-generation contrast medium. Materials and methods. Between January 2002 and December 2003 we evaluated 126 acute patients by using real-time contrast-specific US: blunt abdominal trauma (76 cases), penetrating abdominal trauma (3), blunt scrotal trauma (1), right upper abdominal pain (10), left upper abdominal pain (9), epigastric pain (2), flank pain (5), right lower abdominal pain (2), scrotal pain (7), postoperative abdominal sepsis (1), post-biopsy haemorrhage (1), ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (8), postsurgical aortic bleeding (1). In all cases the radiologist performed a complete baseline US survey and then decided whether or not to add a contrast-enhanced examination. Results. All contrast-enhanced sonographic studies were completed proving to be adequate for diagnostic purposes and without adverse reactions to contrast medium. There were 40 true negatives. The final diagnosis, obtained in 85 positive cases out of 86, was: splenic injury (28 cases), hepatic injury (3), renal injury (3), multiple injuries (3), pancreatic and portal vein injury (1), colonic-mesocolic injury (1), testicular trauma (1), hepatic abscess (9), hepatic ischaemia (1), gangrenous cholecystitis (1), splenic infarction (8), splenic haematoma abscess (1), renal infection (4), renal infarction (1), necrotizing pancreatitis (1), post-biopsy haemorrhage (1), appendicitis (2), peritoneal abscesses (1), testicular torsion (6), orchiepididymitis (1), iliac artery dissection (1), ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (6), aortic periprosthetic hemorrhage (1). Out of 85 positive cases, agreement between baseline US and contrast-specific US was absent in 8% of cases, low in 26%, intermediate in 42%, and high in 24%. Baseline US had 3 false positives. Relevance of contrast-specific US was absent in 17% of cases, low (additional data not relevant for patient management) in 26%, intermediate (relevant additional data not modifying patient management) in 34%, and high (additional data modifying patient management) in 23%. Agreement between contrast-specific US and the gold standards was absent in 0% of cases, low in 6%, intermediate in 38%, and high in 56%. Contrast-specific US had 2 false positive results. Conclusions. Real-time contrast-specific US is an effective technique in emergency imaging. Its role should not be considered as a replacement of CT (though in some instances it can be considered a valuable alternative) but as a useful integration of conventional US. By always having the opportunity to add contrast-enhanced imaging, in case of interpretation doubts or diagnostic difficulties, the radiologist can assess the emergency patient with improved confidence and skill.

KW - Abdomen

KW - Contrast media

KW - Nontraumatic emergencies

KW - Scrotum

KW - Sonography

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13244291566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13244291566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Articolo

C2 - 15722992

AN - SCOPUS:13244291566

VL - 108

SP - 454

EP - 469

JO - Radiologia Medica

JF - Radiologia Medica

SN - 0033-8362

IS - 5-6

ER -