Reasons for excision of skin tumors: A one-year prospective study in a tertiary skin cancer unit

Aimilios Lallas, Caterina Longo, Elvira Moscarella, Mara Lombardi, Francesca Specchio, Margherita Raucci, Iris Zalaudek, Giuseppe Argenziano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Biopsies and surgical excisions represent routine procedures in clinical settings dealing with skin cancer. Objective: To evaluate the impact of clinical examination, dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy and digital monitoring on the decision to excise or biopsy a lesion in routine practice. Methods: Patients scheduled for biopsy or excision of a skin lesion were prospectively enrolled. The expert dermatologist was asked to select the main factor that prompted him/her to excise or biopsy the lesion. Results: The most common reason for melanoma excision was clinical and dermoscopic morphology (70.3%), followed by dermoscopy (11.4%), monitoring (8.9%) and clinical context (8.2%). Most basal and squamous cell carcinomas were recognized both clinically and dermoscopically, while 18.6 and 15.0%, respectively, could only be detected with dermoscopic examination. Conclusion: Each part of the clinical examination has a contributory role in the diagnosis of melanoma and other skin cancers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)340-346
Number of pages7
JournalDermatology
Volume230
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 28 2015

Keywords

  • Basal cell carcinoma
  • Diagnosis
  • Excision
  • Melanoma
  • Squamous cell carcinoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reasons for excision of skin tumors: A one-year prospective study in a tertiary skin cancer unit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Lallas, A., Longo, C., Moscarella, E., Lombardi, M., Specchio, F., Raucci, M., Zalaudek, I., & Argenziano, G. (2015). Reasons for excision of skin tumors: A one-year prospective study in a tertiary skin cancer unit. Dermatology, 230(4), 340-346. https://doi.org/10.1159/000371878