Recognition memory in conversion hysteria

Effect of sexual stimuli during learning

A. Dal Bo, A. Ceola, F. Brighenti, C. Semenza, C. de Bertolini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Hysteria has two main explanatory models: a neurobiological and a psychodynamic. Both models can predict a memory deficit, as a consequence either of a neurophysiological inhibition or of a repression produced by a conflict. The existence of a conflict can also be proved by showing the stimulating, and not the inhibitory effect that conflictual material can have when appropriately shown. Ten female hysterical patients and 10 nonpsychiatric female patients were submitted to a short-term memory test consisting of pictures. In one session all pictures were neutral, while in a second session the neutral were mixed with mild sexually charged pictures, excluded from subsequent recall. The overall performances of the two groups were not significantly different, but the hysterical patients remembered better the pictures linked to the sexual ones, while the control group did the opposite. The results are consistent with the psychodynamic model, while they cannot be explained by the neurobiological.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)535-539
Number of pages5
JournalActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Volume70
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 1984

Fingerprint

Conversion Disorder
Learning
Hysteria
Memory Disorders
Short-Term Memory
Control Groups
Recognition (Psychology)
Conflict (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Dal Bo, A., Ceola, A., Brighenti, F., Semenza, C., & de Bertolini, C. (1984). Recognition memory in conversion hysteria: Effect of sexual stimuli during learning. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 70(6), 535-539.

Recognition memory in conversion hysteria : Effect of sexual stimuli during learning. / Dal Bo, A.; Ceola, A.; Brighenti, F.; Semenza, C.; de Bertolini, C.

In: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Vol. 70, No. 6, 1984, p. 535-539.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dal Bo, A, Ceola, A, Brighenti, F, Semenza, C & de Bertolini, C 1984, 'Recognition memory in conversion hysteria: Effect of sexual stimuli during learning', Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 535-539.
Dal Bo A, Ceola A, Brighenti F, Semenza C, de Bertolini C. Recognition memory in conversion hysteria: Effect of sexual stimuli during learning. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1984;70(6):535-539.
Dal Bo, A. ; Ceola, A. ; Brighenti, F. ; Semenza, C. ; de Bertolini, C. / Recognition memory in conversion hysteria : Effect of sexual stimuli during learning. In: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1984 ; Vol. 70, No. 6. pp. 535-539.
@article{597d9d90cd084b659c19efe782cf15d6,
title = "Recognition memory in conversion hysteria: Effect of sexual stimuli during learning",
abstract = "Hysteria has two main explanatory models: a neurobiological and a psychodynamic. Both models can predict a memory deficit, as a consequence either of a neurophysiological inhibition or of a repression produced by a conflict. The existence of a conflict can also be proved by showing the stimulating, and not the inhibitory effect that conflictual material can have when appropriately shown. Ten female hysterical patients and 10 nonpsychiatric female patients were submitted to a short-term memory test consisting of pictures. In one session all pictures were neutral, while in a second session the neutral were mixed with mild sexually charged pictures, excluded from subsequent recall. The overall performances of the two groups were not significantly different, but the hysterical patients remembered better the pictures linked to the sexual ones, while the control group did the opposite. The results are consistent with the psychodynamic model, while they cannot be explained by the neurobiological.",
author = "{Dal Bo}, A. and A. Ceola and F. Brighenti and C. Semenza and {de Bertolini}, C.",
year = "1984",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "535--539",
journal = "Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-690X",
publisher = "wiley",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recognition memory in conversion hysteria

T2 - Effect of sexual stimuli during learning

AU - Dal Bo, A.

AU - Ceola, A.

AU - Brighenti, F.

AU - Semenza, C.

AU - de Bertolini, C.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - Hysteria has two main explanatory models: a neurobiological and a psychodynamic. Both models can predict a memory deficit, as a consequence either of a neurophysiological inhibition or of a repression produced by a conflict. The existence of a conflict can also be proved by showing the stimulating, and not the inhibitory effect that conflictual material can have when appropriately shown. Ten female hysterical patients and 10 nonpsychiatric female patients were submitted to a short-term memory test consisting of pictures. In one session all pictures were neutral, while in a second session the neutral were mixed with mild sexually charged pictures, excluded from subsequent recall. The overall performances of the two groups were not significantly different, but the hysterical patients remembered better the pictures linked to the sexual ones, while the control group did the opposite. The results are consistent with the psychodynamic model, while they cannot be explained by the neurobiological.

AB - Hysteria has two main explanatory models: a neurobiological and a psychodynamic. Both models can predict a memory deficit, as a consequence either of a neurophysiological inhibition or of a repression produced by a conflict. The existence of a conflict can also be proved by showing the stimulating, and not the inhibitory effect that conflictual material can have when appropriately shown. Ten female hysterical patients and 10 nonpsychiatric female patients were submitted to a short-term memory test consisting of pictures. In one session all pictures were neutral, while in a second session the neutral were mixed with mild sexually charged pictures, excluded from subsequent recall. The overall performances of the two groups were not significantly different, but the hysterical patients remembered better the pictures linked to the sexual ones, while the control group did the opposite. The results are consistent with the psychodynamic model, while they cannot be explained by the neurobiological.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021673284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021673284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 535

EP - 539

JO - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-690X

IS - 6

ER -