Regional anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy: A randomized clinical comparison of two different anaesthetic techniques

A. Casati, G. Cappelleri, G. Fanelli, B. Borghi, D. Anelati, M. Berti, G. Torri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to evaluate the time required to perform anaesthesia, achieve surgical block and fulfil standardized discharge criteria in outpatients receiving knee arthroscopy with either spinal anaesthesia or combined sciatic-femoral nerve block. Methods: After a standard midazolam/ketoprofen premedication and baseline measurement of cardiovascular parameters, 50 ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective outpatient knee arthroscopy were randomized to receive spinal anaesthesia with 8 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (group Spinal, n=25), or combined sciatic-femoral nerve block with 25 ml of mepivacaine 20 mg ml-1 and a multiple injection technique (15 ml for femoral nerve block and 10 ml for sciatic nerve block). Times lasting from skin disinfection to the end of local anaesthetic injection (preparation time) and then to achieve surgical anaesthesia (readiness for surgery), as well as times required for block resolution, micturition, unassisted ambulation, and home discharge were recorded by a blinded observer. Occurrence of adverse events was also recorded. Results: Preparation time (mean±SD) was longer with sciatic- femoral block (8±2.7 min) than spinal anaesthesia (5±2.1 min) (P=0.0002) while no differences were observed in the time required to achieve readiness for surgery (14±5 min and 15±6 min in the Spinal and Sciatic-femoral groups, respectively). No differences in haemodynamic side effects and need for intraoperative additional analgesia were observed. Patients receiving spinal anaesthesia showed a faster resolution of nerve block and longer time to micturition (137±49 min and 231±101 min) than patients receiving peripheral nerve blockade (206±51 min and 145±36 min) (P-1 and a multiple injection technique results in a slightly longer preoperative time but provides similarly effective anaesthesia with no differences in home discharge times as compared to spinal anaesthesia with 8 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine. (C) Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 40 (2000).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)543-547
Number of pages5
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Conduction Anesthesia
Arthroscopy
Anesthetics
Knee
Outpatients
Nerve Block
Spinal Anesthesia
Femoral Nerve
Sciatic Nerve
Anesthesia
Urination
Bupivacaine
Thigh
Injections
Mepivacaine
Ketoprofen
Premedication
Midazolam
Disinfection
Local Anesthetics

Keywords

  • Anesthesia, ambulatory
  • Anesthesia, regional: spinal, peripheral nerve blocks
  • Anesthetic, local: bupivacaine, mepivacaine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Regional anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy : A randomized clinical comparison of two different anaesthetic techniques. / Casati, A.; Cappelleri, G.; Fanelli, G.; Borghi, B.; Anelati, D.; Berti, M.; Torri, G.

In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2000, p. 543-547.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Casati, A. ; Cappelleri, G. ; Fanelli, G. ; Borghi, B. ; Anelati, D. ; Berti, M. ; Torri, G. / Regional anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy : A randomized clinical comparison of two different anaesthetic techniques. In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2000 ; Vol. 44, No. 5. pp. 543-547.
@article{86715fc65abe430cbb51b91ba585e36d,
title = "Regional anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy: A randomized clinical comparison of two different anaesthetic techniques",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to evaluate the time required to perform anaesthesia, achieve surgical block and fulfil standardized discharge criteria in outpatients receiving knee arthroscopy with either spinal anaesthesia or combined sciatic-femoral nerve block. Methods: After a standard midazolam/ketoprofen premedication and baseline measurement of cardiovascular parameters, 50 ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective outpatient knee arthroscopy were randomized to receive spinal anaesthesia with 8 mg of 0.5{\%} hyperbaric bupivacaine (group Spinal, n=25), or combined sciatic-femoral nerve block with 25 ml of mepivacaine 20 mg ml-1 and a multiple injection technique (15 ml for femoral nerve block and 10 ml for sciatic nerve block). Times lasting from skin disinfection to the end of local anaesthetic injection (preparation time) and then to achieve surgical anaesthesia (readiness for surgery), as well as times required for block resolution, micturition, unassisted ambulation, and home discharge were recorded by a blinded observer. Occurrence of adverse events was also recorded. Results: Preparation time (mean±SD) was longer with sciatic- femoral block (8±2.7 min) than spinal anaesthesia (5±2.1 min) (P=0.0002) while no differences were observed in the time required to achieve readiness for surgery (14±5 min and 15±6 min in the Spinal and Sciatic-femoral groups, respectively). No differences in haemodynamic side effects and need for intraoperative additional analgesia were observed. Patients receiving spinal anaesthesia showed a faster resolution of nerve block and longer time to micturition (137±49 min and 231±101 min) than patients receiving peripheral nerve blockade (206±51 min and 145±36 min) (P-1 and a multiple injection technique results in a slightly longer preoperative time but provides similarly effective anaesthesia with no differences in home discharge times as compared to spinal anaesthesia with 8 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine. (C) Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 40 (2000).",
keywords = "Anesthesia, ambulatory, Anesthesia, regional: spinal, peripheral nerve blocks, Anesthetic, local: bupivacaine, mepivacaine",
author = "A. Casati and G. Cappelleri and G. Fanelli and B. Borghi and D. Anelati and M. Berti and G. Torri",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.00509.x",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "543--547",
journal = "Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-5172",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regional anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy

T2 - A randomized clinical comparison of two different anaesthetic techniques

AU - Casati, A.

AU - Cappelleri, G.

AU - Fanelli, G.

AU - Borghi, B.

AU - Anelati, D.

AU - Berti, M.

AU - Torri, G.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Background: The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to evaluate the time required to perform anaesthesia, achieve surgical block and fulfil standardized discharge criteria in outpatients receiving knee arthroscopy with either spinal anaesthesia or combined sciatic-femoral nerve block. Methods: After a standard midazolam/ketoprofen premedication and baseline measurement of cardiovascular parameters, 50 ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective outpatient knee arthroscopy were randomized to receive spinal anaesthesia with 8 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (group Spinal, n=25), or combined sciatic-femoral nerve block with 25 ml of mepivacaine 20 mg ml-1 and a multiple injection technique (15 ml for femoral nerve block and 10 ml for sciatic nerve block). Times lasting from skin disinfection to the end of local anaesthetic injection (preparation time) and then to achieve surgical anaesthesia (readiness for surgery), as well as times required for block resolution, micturition, unassisted ambulation, and home discharge were recorded by a blinded observer. Occurrence of adverse events was also recorded. Results: Preparation time (mean±SD) was longer with sciatic- femoral block (8±2.7 min) than spinal anaesthesia (5±2.1 min) (P=0.0002) while no differences were observed in the time required to achieve readiness for surgery (14±5 min and 15±6 min in the Spinal and Sciatic-femoral groups, respectively). No differences in haemodynamic side effects and need for intraoperative additional analgesia were observed. Patients receiving spinal anaesthesia showed a faster resolution of nerve block and longer time to micturition (137±49 min and 231±101 min) than patients receiving peripheral nerve blockade (206±51 min and 145±36 min) (P-1 and a multiple injection technique results in a slightly longer preoperative time but provides similarly effective anaesthesia with no differences in home discharge times as compared to spinal anaesthesia with 8 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine. (C) Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 40 (2000).

AB - Background: The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to evaluate the time required to perform anaesthesia, achieve surgical block and fulfil standardized discharge criteria in outpatients receiving knee arthroscopy with either spinal anaesthesia or combined sciatic-femoral nerve block. Methods: After a standard midazolam/ketoprofen premedication and baseline measurement of cardiovascular parameters, 50 ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective outpatient knee arthroscopy were randomized to receive spinal anaesthesia with 8 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (group Spinal, n=25), or combined sciatic-femoral nerve block with 25 ml of mepivacaine 20 mg ml-1 and a multiple injection technique (15 ml for femoral nerve block and 10 ml for sciatic nerve block). Times lasting from skin disinfection to the end of local anaesthetic injection (preparation time) and then to achieve surgical anaesthesia (readiness for surgery), as well as times required for block resolution, micturition, unassisted ambulation, and home discharge were recorded by a blinded observer. Occurrence of adverse events was also recorded. Results: Preparation time (mean±SD) was longer with sciatic- femoral block (8±2.7 min) than spinal anaesthesia (5±2.1 min) (P=0.0002) while no differences were observed in the time required to achieve readiness for surgery (14±5 min and 15±6 min in the Spinal and Sciatic-femoral groups, respectively). No differences in haemodynamic side effects and need for intraoperative additional analgesia were observed. Patients receiving spinal anaesthesia showed a faster resolution of nerve block and longer time to micturition (137±49 min and 231±101 min) than patients receiving peripheral nerve blockade (206±51 min and 145±36 min) (P-1 and a multiple injection technique results in a slightly longer preoperative time but provides similarly effective anaesthesia with no differences in home discharge times as compared to spinal anaesthesia with 8 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine. (C) Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 40 (2000).

KW - Anesthesia, ambulatory

KW - Anesthesia, regional: spinal, peripheral nerve blocks

KW - Anesthetic, local: bupivacaine, mepivacaine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034012113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034012113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.00509.x

DO - 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.00509.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 10786739

AN - SCOPUS:0034012113

VL - 44

SP - 543

EP - 547

JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-5172

IS - 5

ER -