Reliability among neurologists in the severity assessment of blepharospasm and oromandibular dystonia: A multicenter study

G. Defazio, V. Lepore, G. Abbruzzese, E. Barontini, A. Berardelli, T. Caraceni, F. Carella, P. Girlanda, M. Manfredi, C. Messina, S. Maurri, E. Ferrari, P. Livrea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The reliability of a scale of 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal) in rating the severity of blepharospasm (BS) and oromandibular dystonia (OMD) was evaluated by the concordance among six neurologists from different neurological institutions. As expressed by k index, interobserver agreement was moderate either for BS or for OMD according to the Landis classification. Neurologists showed different rating attitude toward BS and OMD. In fact, the category analysis showed that raters were inclined to overestimate BS and to underestimate OMD. The familiarity with dystonia influenced reliability more than the length of professional experience in neurology. In fact, when examiners were subdivided into subgroups (each of three raters) according to the former criteria, the level of interobserver agreement increased significantly. Almost perfect agreement was obtained in intrarater comparisons. These results may be of value with regard to the conduct of multicenter epidemiologic and clinical studies on focal dystonias.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)616-621
Number of pages6
JournalMovement Disorders
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Meige Syndrome
Multicenter Studies
Dystonia
Blepharospasm
Dystonic Disorders
Neurology
Epidemiologic Studies
Neurologists

Keywords

  • Focal dystonia
  • k statistics
  • Rating scale
  • Reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Reliability among neurologists in the severity assessment of blepharospasm and oromandibular dystonia : A multicenter study. / Defazio, G.; Lepore, V.; Abbruzzese, G.; Barontini, E.; Berardelli, A.; Caraceni, T.; Carella, F.; Girlanda, P.; Manfredi, M.; Messina, C.; Maurri, S.; Ferrari, E.; Livrea, P.

In: Movement Disorders, Vol. 9, No. 6, 1994, p. 616-621.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Defazio, G, Lepore, V, Abbruzzese, G, Barontini, E, Berardelli, A, Caraceni, T, Carella, F, Girlanda, P, Manfredi, M, Messina, C, Maurri, S, Ferrari, E & Livrea, P 1994, 'Reliability among neurologists in the severity assessment of blepharospasm and oromandibular dystonia: A multicenter study', Movement Disorders, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 616-621. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.870090606
Defazio, G. ; Lepore, V. ; Abbruzzese, G. ; Barontini, E. ; Berardelli, A. ; Caraceni, T. ; Carella, F. ; Girlanda, P. ; Manfredi, M. ; Messina, C. ; Maurri, S. ; Ferrari, E. ; Livrea, P. / Reliability among neurologists in the severity assessment of blepharospasm and oromandibular dystonia : A multicenter study. In: Movement Disorders. 1994 ; Vol. 9, No. 6. pp. 616-621.
@article{205287692f4246a1bc570a672686193d,
title = "Reliability among neurologists in the severity assessment of blepharospasm and oromandibular dystonia: A multicenter study",
abstract = "The reliability of a scale of 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal) in rating the severity of blepharospasm (BS) and oromandibular dystonia (OMD) was evaluated by the concordance among six neurologists from different neurological institutions. As expressed by k index, interobserver agreement was moderate either for BS or for OMD according to the Landis classification. Neurologists showed different rating attitude toward BS and OMD. In fact, the category analysis showed that raters were inclined to overestimate BS and to underestimate OMD. The familiarity with dystonia influenced reliability more than the length of professional experience in neurology. In fact, when examiners were subdivided into subgroups (each of three raters) according to the former criteria, the level of interobserver agreement increased significantly. Almost perfect agreement was obtained in intrarater comparisons. These results may be of value with regard to the conduct of multicenter epidemiologic and clinical studies on focal dystonias.",
keywords = "Focal dystonia, k statistics, Rating scale, Reliability",
author = "G. Defazio and V. Lepore and G. Abbruzzese and E. Barontini and A. Berardelli and T. Caraceni and F. Carella and P. Girlanda and M. Manfredi and C. Messina and S. Maurri and E. Ferrari and P. Livrea",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1002/mds.870090606",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "616--621",
journal = "Movement Disorders",
issn = "0885-3185",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability among neurologists in the severity assessment of blepharospasm and oromandibular dystonia

T2 - A multicenter study

AU - Defazio, G.

AU - Lepore, V.

AU - Abbruzzese, G.

AU - Barontini, E.

AU - Berardelli, A.

AU - Caraceni, T.

AU - Carella, F.

AU - Girlanda, P.

AU - Manfredi, M.

AU - Messina, C.

AU - Maurri, S.

AU - Ferrari, E.

AU - Livrea, P.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - The reliability of a scale of 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal) in rating the severity of blepharospasm (BS) and oromandibular dystonia (OMD) was evaluated by the concordance among six neurologists from different neurological institutions. As expressed by k index, interobserver agreement was moderate either for BS or for OMD according to the Landis classification. Neurologists showed different rating attitude toward BS and OMD. In fact, the category analysis showed that raters were inclined to overestimate BS and to underestimate OMD. The familiarity with dystonia influenced reliability more than the length of professional experience in neurology. In fact, when examiners were subdivided into subgroups (each of three raters) according to the former criteria, the level of interobserver agreement increased significantly. Almost perfect agreement was obtained in intrarater comparisons. These results may be of value with regard to the conduct of multicenter epidemiologic and clinical studies on focal dystonias.

AB - The reliability of a scale of 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal) in rating the severity of blepharospasm (BS) and oromandibular dystonia (OMD) was evaluated by the concordance among six neurologists from different neurological institutions. As expressed by k index, interobserver agreement was moderate either for BS or for OMD according to the Landis classification. Neurologists showed different rating attitude toward BS and OMD. In fact, the category analysis showed that raters were inclined to overestimate BS and to underestimate OMD. The familiarity with dystonia influenced reliability more than the length of professional experience in neurology. In fact, when examiners were subdivided into subgroups (each of three raters) according to the former criteria, the level of interobserver agreement increased significantly. Almost perfect agreement was obtained in intrarater comparisons. These results may be of value with regard to the conduct of multicenter epidemiologic and clinical studies on focal dystonias.

KW - Focal dystonia

KW - k statistics

KW - Rating scale

KW - Reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027984420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027984420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mds.870090606

DO - 10.1002/mds.870090606

M3 - Article

C2 - 7845401

AN - SCOPUS:0027984420

VL - 9

SP - 616

EP - 621

JO - Movement Disorders

JF - Movement Disorders

SN - 0885-3185

IS - 6

ER -