Reliability and Clinical Validity of the Italian Reflux Symptom Index

Antonio Schindler, Francesco Mozzanica, Daniela Ginocchio, Andrea Peri, Alessandro Bottero, Francesco Ottaviani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Currently, there is no Italian version of the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI). The aim of this study was to develop an Italian RSI and to evaluate its internal consistency, reliability, and clinical validity. The study design used was a cross-sectional survey study. Eighty patients with a Reflux Finding Score (RFS) >7, and 193 asymptomatic subjects were included in the study. For the RSI reliability analysis, the appositely developed Italian RSI was filled twice, with a week interval, by the 80 patients and 80 control subjects. The test-retest reliability was assessed through the Pearson correlation test, whereas the Cronbach's α coefficient was used for internal consistency analysis. For the clinical validity assessment, the scores obtained in the pathological group were compared with the data from the asymptomatic individuals through the Student's t test. Finally, the correlation between RSI and RFS in the 80 patients was assessed. All of the patients filled in the entire questionnaire autonomously. The test-retest reliability in the patients, as well as in the control group, was very high (r > 0.90); the internal consistency also showed very high values (α = 0.99). The mean RSI score in the patients was 21.1 ± 6.6, whereas in the control group it was 6.3 ± 5.6; the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). The mean RFS score in the 80 patients was 9.2 ± 2.7 and the correlation between RFS score and RSI score was rather high (r = 0.89). The Italian RSI is easily administered, highly reproducible, and exhibits excellent clinical validity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)354-358
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Voice
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Cross-Sectional Studies
Control Groups
Students

Keywords

  • Laryngopharyngeal reflux
  • Outcome
  • Quality of life
  • Reflux symptom index

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing
  • LPN and LVN

Cite this

Schindler, A., Mozzanica, F., Ginocchio, D., Peri, A., Bottero, A., & Ottaviani, F. (2010). Reliability and Clinical Validity of the Italian Reflux Symptom Index. Journal of Voice, 24(3), 354-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.08.008

Reliability and Clinical Validity of the Italian Reflux Symptom Index. / Schindler, Antonio; Mozzanica, Francesco; Ginocchio, Daniela; Peri, Andrea; Bottero, Alessandro; Ottaviani, Francesco.

In: Journal of Voice, Vol. 24, No. 3, 05.2010, p. 354-358.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schindler, A, Mozzanica, F, Ginocchio, D, Peri, A, Bottero, A & Ottaviani, F 2010, 'Reliability and Clinical Validity of the Italian Reflux Symptom Index', Journal of Voice, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 354-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.08.008
Schindler, Antonio ; Mozzanica, Francesco ; Ginocchio, Daniela ; Peri, Andrea ; Bottero, Alessandro ; Ottaviani, Francesco. / Reliability and Clinical Validity of the Italian Reflux Symptom Index. In: Journal of Voice. 2010 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 354-358.
@article{04a11da0efaa458f877a70a452f200ba,
title = "Reliability and Clinical Validity of the Italian Reflux Symptom Index",
abstract = "Currently, there is no Italian version of the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI). The aim of this study was to develop an Italian RSI and to evaluate its internal consistency, reliability, and clinical validity. The study design used was a cross-sectional survey study. Eighty patients with a Reflux Finding Score (RFS) >7, and 193 asymptomatic subjects were included in the study. For the RSI reliability analysis, the appositely developed Italian RSI was filled twice, with a week interval, by the 80 patients and 80 control subjects. The test-retest reliability was assessed through the Pearson correlation test, whereas the Cronbach's α coefficient was used for internal consistency analysis. For the clinical validity assessment, the scores obtained in the pathological group were compared with the data from the asymptomatic individuals through the Student's t test. Finally, the correlation between RSI and RFS in the 80 patients was assessed. All of the patients filled in the entire questionnaire autonomously. The test-retest reliability in the patients, as well as in the control group, was very high (r > 0.90); the internal consistency also showed very high values (α = 0.99). The mean RSI score in the patients was 21.1 ± 6.6, whereas in the control group it was 6.3 ± 5.6; the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). The mean RFS score in the 80 patients was 9.2 ± 2.7 and the correlation between RFS score and RSI score was rather high (r = 0.89). The Italian RSI is easily administered, highly reproducible, and exhibits excellent clinical validity.",
keywords = "Laryngopharyngeal reflux, Outcome, Quality of life, Reflux symptom index",
author = "Antonio Schindler and Francesco Mozzanica and Daniela Ginocchio and Andrea Peri and Alessandro Bottero and Francesco Ottaviani",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.08.008",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "354--358",
journal = "Journal of Voice",
issn = "0892-1997",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and Clinical Validity of the Italian Reflux Symptom Index

AU - Schindler, Antonio

AU - Mozzanica, Francesco

AU - Ginocchio, Daniela

AU - Peri, Andrea

AU - Bottero, Alessandro

AU - Ottaviani, Francesco

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Currently, there is no Italian version of the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI). The aim of this study was to develop an Italian RSI and to evaluate its internal consistency, reliability, and clinical validity. The study design used was a cross-sectional survey study. Eighty patients with a Reflux Finding Score (RFS) >7, and 193 asymptomatic subjects were included in the study. For the RSI reliability analysis, the appositely developed Italian RSI was filled twice, with a week interval, by the 80 patients and 80 control subjects. The test-retest reliability was assessed through the Pearson correlation test, whereas the Cronbach's α coefficient was used for internal consistency analysis. For the clinical validity assessment, the scores obtained in the pathological group were compared with the data from the asymptomatic individuals through the Student's t test. Finally, the correlation between RSI and RFS in the 80 patients was assessed. All of the patients filled in the entire questionnaire autonomously. The test-retest reliability in the patients, as well as in the control group, was very high (r > 0.90); the internal consistency also showed very high values (α = 0.99). The mean RSI score in the patients was 21.1 ± 6.6, whereas in the control group it was 6.3 ± 5.6; the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). The mean RFS score in the 80 patients was 9.2 ± 2.7 and the correlation between RFS score and RSI score was rather high (r = 0.89). The Italian RSI is easily administered, highly reproducible, and exhibits excellent clinical validity.

AB - Currently, there is no Italian version of the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI). The aim of this study was to develop an Italian RSI and to evaluate its internal consistency, reliability, and clinical validity. The study design used was a cross-sectional survey study. Eighty patients with a Reflux Finding Score (RFS) >7, and 193 asymptomatic subjects were included in the study. For the RSI reliability analysis, the appositely developed Italian RSI was filled twice, with a week interval, by the 80 patients and 80 control subjects. The test-retest reliability was assessed through the Pearson correlation test, whereas the Cronbach's α coefficient was used for internal consistency analysis. For the clinical validity assessment, the scores obtained in the pathological group were compared with the data from the asymptomatic individuals through the Student's t test. Finally, the correlation between RSI and RFS in the 80 patients was assessed. All of the patients filled in the entire questionnaire autonomously. The test-retest reliability in the patients, as well as in the control group, was very high (r > 0.90); the internal consistency also showed very high values (α = 0.99). The mean RSI score in the patients was 21.1 ± 6.6, whereas in the control group it was 6.3 ± 5.6; the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). The mean RFS score in the 80 patients was 9.2 ± 2.7 and the correlation between RFS score and RSI score was rather high (r = 0.89). The Italian RSI is easily administered, highly reproducible, and exhibits excellent clinical validity.

KW - Laryngopharyngeal reflux

KW - Outcome

KW - Quality of life

KW - Reflux symptom index

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951879725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951879725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.08.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.08.008

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 354

EP - 358

JO - Journal of Voice

JF - Journal of Voice

SN - 0892-1997

IS - 3

ER -