Reliability and feasibility of longitudinal AFI global and segmental strain compared with 2D left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: Intra- and inter-operator, test-retest, and inter-cycle reproducibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims Echocardiographic evaluation of 2Dlongitudinal peak systolic strain (LPSS) can detect initial impairment of left ventricular (LV) function in heart disease. Global LPSS (GLPSS) variability has been assessed in small groups and segmental LPSS has not been determined.We compared variability of GLPSS and segmental LPSS with that of 2D LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) in patients with and without heart diseases. Methods and results 2D speckle tracking analysis was performed on LV apical views using automated function imaging (AFI) software (GE Healthcare). Intra-operator, inter-cycle, and test-retest variability (bias and CR, coefficient of reproducibility; MPE, mean percent error; CV, coefficient of variation) was assessed for GLPSS, 18 segments of LPSS, and LV volumes and EF in 40 patients (720 segments), and inter-operator variability in 250 patients (4500 segments). Feasibility of segmental tracking was 93.1%. Variability of GLPSS increased from a minimum intra-operator CV = 22.6% to a maximum test-retest CV = 25.4% and was lower than that assessed for volumes and EF. Segmental intra-operator LPSS CV ranged from 25.6 to 214.7%, and test-retest from 28 to 222%, and was at worst similar to variability of end-systolic volume. In the 8.3% of segments with the highest variability, this was related to suboptimal imaging, minor changes in scan angulation, and insufficient ROI width. Conclusion Overall, reproducibility of GLPSS is excellent and superior to that of 2D EF, whereas segmental LPSS reproducibility is good and similar to that of LV volumes. Both are suitable for diagnosis and follow-up of LV global and regional systolic function.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)642-652
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Stroke Volume
Heart Diseases
Left Ventricular Function
Software
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Echocardiography
  • Ejection fraction
  • Reproducibility
  • Strain
  • Ventricular
  • Volumes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{2a1093fa5b2c4ef294d108cba1d1c753,
title = "Reliability and feasibility of longitudinal AFI global and segmental strain compared with 2D left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: Intra- and inter-operator, test-retest, and inter-cycle reproducibility",
abstract = "Aims Echocardiographic evaluation of 2Dlongitudinal peak systolic strain (LPSS) can detect initial impairment of left ventricular (LV) function in heart disease. Global LPSS (GLPSS) variability has been assessed in small groups and segmental LPSS has not been determined.We compared variability of GLPSS and segmental LPSS with that of 2D LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) in patients with and without heart diseases. Methods and results 2D speckle tracking analysis was performed on LV apical views using automated function imaging (AFI) software (GE Healthcare). Intra-operator, inter-cycle, and test-retest variability (bias and CR, coefficient of reproducibility; MPE, mean percent error; CV, coefficient of variation) was assessed for GLPSS, 18 segments of LPSS, and LV volumes and EF in 40 patients (720 segments), and inter-operator variability in 250 patients (4500 segments). Feasibility of segmental tracking was 93.1{\%}. Variability of GLPSS increased from a minimum intra-operator CV = 22.6{\%} to a maximum test-retest CV = 25.4{\%} and was lower than that assessed for volumes and EF. Segmental intra-operator LPSS CV ranged from 25.6 to 214.7{\%}, and test-retest from 28 to 222{\%}, and was at worst similar to variability of end-systolic volume. In the 8.3{\%} of segments with the highest variability, this was related to suboptimal imaging, minor changes in scan angulation, and insufficient ROI width. Conclusion Overall, reproducibility of GLPSS is excellent and superior to that of 2D EF, whereas segmental LPSS reproducibility is good and similar to that of LV volumes. Both are suitable for diagnosis and follow-up of LV global and regional systolic function.",
keywords = "Echocardiography, Ejection fraction, Reproducibility, Strain, Ventricular, Volumes",
author = "Paolo Barbier and Oana Mirea and Claudia Cefal{\`u} and Anna Maltagliati and Gabriele Savioli and Marco Guglielmo",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1093/ehjci/jeu274",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "642--652",
journal = "European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging",
issn = "2047-2404",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and feasibility of longitudinal AFI global and segmental strain compared with 2D left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction

T2 - Intra- and inter-operator, test-retest, and inter-cycle reproducibility

AU - Barbier, Paolo

AU - Mirea, Oana

AU - Cefalù, Claudia

AU - Maltagliati, Anna

AU - Savioli, Gabriele

AU - Guglielmo, Marco

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Aims Echocardiographic evaluation of 2Dlongitudinal peak systolic strain (LPSS) can detect initial impairment of left ventricular (LV) function in heart disease. Global LPSS (GLPSS) variability has been assessed in small groups and segmental LPSS has not been determined.We compared variability of GLPSS and segmental LPSS with that of 2D LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) in patients with and without heart diseases. Methods and results 2D speckle tracking analysis was performed on LV apical views using automated function imaging (AFI) software (GE Healthcare). Intra-operator, inter-cycle, and test-retest variability (bias and CR, coefficient of reproducibility; MPE, mean percent error; CV, coefficient of variation) was assessed for GLPSS, 18 segments of LPSS, and LV volumes and EF in 40 patients (720 segments), and inter-operator variability in 250 patients (4500 segments). Feasibility of segmental tracking was 93.1%. Variability of GLPSS increased from a minimum intra-operator CV = 22.6% to a maximum test-retest CV = 25.4% and was lower than that assessed for volumes and EF. Segmental intra-operator LPSS CV ranged from 25.6 to 214.7%, and test-retest from 28 to 222%, and was at worst similar to variability of end-systolic volume. In the 8.3% of segments with the highest variability, this was related to suboptimal imaging, minor changes in scan angulation, and insufficient ROI width. Conclusion Overall, reproducibility of GLPSS is excellent and superior to that of 2D EF, whereas segmental LPSS reproducibility is good and similar to that of LV volumes. Both are suitable for diagnosis and follow-up of LV global and regional systolic function.

AB - Aims Echocardiographic evaluation of 2Dlongitudinal peak systolic strain (LPSS) can detect initial impairment of left ventricular (LV) function in heart disease. Global LPSS (GLPSS) variability has been assessed in small groups and segmental LPSS has not been determined.We compared variability of GLPSS and segmental LPSS with that of 2D LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) in patients with and without heart diseases. Methods and results 2D speckle tracking analysis was performed on LV apical views using automated function imaging (AFI) software (GE Healthcare). Intra-operator, inter-cycle, and test-retest variability (bias and CR, coefficient of reproducibility; MPE, mean percent error; CV, coefficient of variation) was assessed for GLPSS, 18 segments of LPSS, and LV volumes and EF in 40 patients (720 segments), and inter-operator variability in 250 patients (4500 segments). Feasibility of segmental tracking was 93.1%. Variability of GLPSS increased from a minimum intra-operator CV = 22.6% to a maximum test-retest CV = 25.4% and was lower than that assessed for volumes and EF. Segmental intra-operator LPSS CV ranged from 25.6 to 214.7%, and test-retest from 28 to 222%, and was at worst similar to variability of end-systolic volume. In the 8.3% of segments with the highest variability, this was related to suboptimal imaging, minor changes in scan angulation, and insufficient ROI width. Conclusion Overall, reproducibility of GLPSS is excellent and superior to that of 2D EF, whereas segmental LPSS reproducibility is good and similar to that of LV volumes. Both are suitable for diagnosis and follow-up of LV global and regional systolic function.

KW - Echocardiography

KW - Ejection fraction

KW - Reproducibility

KW - Strain

KW - Ventricular

KW - Volumes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929221350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929221350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ehjci/jeu274

DO - 10.1093/ehjci/jeu274

M3 - Article

C2 - 25564395

AN - SCOPUS:84929221350

VL - 16

SP - 642

EP - 652

JO - European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging

JF - European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging

SN - 2047-2404

IS - 6

ER -