Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale

A study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients

Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch, Sophie Tezenas du Montcel, Laszlo Baliko, Sylvia Boesch, Sara Bonato, Roberto Fancellu, Paola Giunti, Christoph Globas, Jun Suk Kang, Berry Kremer, Caterina Mariotti, Bela Melegh, Maryla Rakowicz, Rafal Rola, Sylvie Romano, Lodger Schöls, Sandra Szymanski, Bart P C van de Warrenburg, Elzbieta Zdzienicka, Alexandra Dürr & 1 others Thomas Klockgether

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of treatments in spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), appropriate clinical scales are required. This study evaluated metric properties of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) in 156 SCA patients and 8 controls. ICARS was found to be a reliable scale satisfying accepted criteria for interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency. Although validity testing was limited, we found evidence of validity of ICARS when ataxia disease stages and Barthel index were used as external criteria. On the other hand, our study revealed two major problems associated with the use of ICARS. First, the redundant and overlapping nature of several items gave rise to a considerable number of contradictory ratings. Second, a factorial analysis showed that the rating results were determined by four different factors that did not coincide with the ICARS subscales, thus questioning the justification of ICARS subscore analysis in clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)699-704
Number of pages6
JournalMovement Disorders
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

Spinocerebellar Ataxias
Ataxia
Reproducibility of Results
Clinical Trials

Keywords

  • Clinical assessment
  • ICARS
  • Spinocerebellar ataxia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Schmitz-Hübsch, T., du Montcel, S. T., Baliko, L., Boesch, S., Bonato, S., Fancellu, R., ... Klockgether, T. (2006). Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale: A study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients. Movement Disorders, 21(5), 699-704. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20781

Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale : A study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients. / Schmitz-Hübsch, Tanja; du Montcel, Sophie Tezenas; Baliko, Laszlo; Boesch, Sylvia; Bonato, Sara; Fancellu, Roberto; Giunti, Paola; Globas, Christoph; Kang, Jun Suk; Kremer, Berry; Mariotti, Caterina; Melegh, Bela; Rakowicz, Maryla; Rola, Rafal; Romano, Sylvie; Schöls, Lodger; Szymanski, Sandra; van de Warrenburg, Bart P C; Zdzienicka, Elzbieta; Dürr, Alexandra; Klockgether, Thomas.

In: Movement Disorders, Vol. 21, No. 5, 05.2006, p. 699-704.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schmitz-Hübsch, T, du Montcel, ST, Baliko, L, Boesch, S, Bonato, S, Fancellu, R, Giunti, P, Globas, C, Kang, JS, Kremer, B, Mariotti, C, Melegh, B, Rakowicz, M, Rola, R, Romano, S, Schöls, L, Szymanski, S, van de Warrenburg, BPC, Zdzienicka, E, Dürr, A & Klockgether, T 2006, 'Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale: A study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients', Movement Disorders, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 699-704. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20781
Schmitz-Hübsch, Tanja ; du Montcel, Sophie Tezenas ; Baliko, Laszlo ; Boesch, Sylvia ; Bonato, Sara ; Fancellu, Roberto ; Giunti, Paola ; Globas, Christoph ; Kang, Jun Suk ; Kremer, Berry ; Mariotti, Caterina ; Melegh, Bela ; Rakowicz, Maryla ; Rola, Rafal ; Romano, Sylvie ; Schöls, Lodger ; Szymanski, Sandra ; van de Warrenburg, Bart P C ; Zdzienicka, Elzbieta ; Dürr, Alexandra ; Klockgether, Thomas. / Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale : A study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients. In: Movement Disorders. 2006 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 699-704.
@article{d4aa9e499d154d719b1a76181103a30d,
title = "Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale: A study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients",
abstract = "To evaluate the efficacy of treatments in spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), appropriate clinical scales are required. This study evaluated metric properties of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) in 156 SCA patients and 8 controls. ICARS was found to be a reliable scale satisfying accepted criteria for interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency. Although validity testing was limited, we found evidence of validity of ICARS when ataxia disease stages and Barthel index were used as external criteria. On the other hand, our study revealed two major problems associated with the use of ICARS. First, the redundant and overlapping nature of several items gave rise to a considerable number of contradictory ratings. Second, a factorial analysis showed that the rating results were determined by four different factors that did not coincide with the ICARS subscales, thus questioning the justification of ICARS subscore analysis in clinical trials.",
keywords = "Clinical assessment, ICARS, Spinocerebellar ataxia",
author = "Tanja Schmitz-H{\"u}bsch and {du Montcel}, {Sophie Tezenas} and Laszlo Baliko and Sylvia Boesch and Sara Bonato and Roberto Fancellu and Paola Giunti and Christoph Globas and Kang, {Jun Suk} and Berry Kremer and Caterina Mariotti and Bela Melegh and Maryla Rakowicz and Rafal Rola and Sylvie Romano and Lodger Sch{\"o}ls and Sandra Szymanski and {van de Warrenburg}, {Bart P C} and Elzbieta Zdzienicka and Alexandra D{\"u}rr and Thomas Klockgether",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/mds.20781",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "699--704",
journal = "Movement Disorders",
issn = "0885-3185",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale

T2 - A study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients

AU - Schmitz-Hübsch, Tanja

AU - du Montcel, Sophie Tezenas

AU - Baliko, Laszlo

AU - Boesch, Sylvia

AU - Bonato, Sara

AU - Fancellu, Roberto

AU - Giunti, Paola

AU - Globas, Christoph

AU - Kang, Jun Suk

AU - Kremer, Berry

AU - Mariotti, Caterina

AU - Melegh, Bela

AU - Rakowicz, Maryla

AU - Rola, Rafal

AU - Romano, Sylvie

AU - Schöls, Lodger

AU - Szymanski, Sandra

AU - van de Warrenburg, Bart P C

AU - Zdzienicka, Elzbieta

AU - Dürr, Alexandra

AU - Klockgether, Thomas

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - To evaluate the efficacy of treatments in spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), appropriate clinical scales are required. This study evaluated metric properties of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) in 156 SCA patients and 8 controls. ICARS was found to be a reliable scale satisfying accepted criteria for interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency. Although validity testing was limited, we found evidence of validity of ICARS when ataxia disease stages and Barthel index were used as external criteria. On the other hand, our study revealed two major problems associated with the use of ICARS. First, the redundant and overlapping nature of several items gave rise to a considerable number of contradictory ratings. Second, a factorial analysis showed that the rating results were determined by four different factors that did not coincide with the ICARS subscales, thus questioning the justification of ICARS subscore analysis in clinical trials.

AB - To evaluate the efficacy of treatments in spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), appropriate clinical scales are required. This study evaluated metric properties of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) in 156 SCA patients and 8 controls. ICARS was found to be a reliable scale satisfying accepted criteria for interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency. Although validity testing was limited, we found evidence of validity of ICARS when ataxia disease stages and Barthel index were used as external criteria. On the other hand, our study revealed two major problems associated with the use of ICARS. First, the redundant and overlapping nature of several items gave rise to a considerable number of contradictory ratings. Second, a factorial analysis showed that the rating results were determined by four different factors that did not coincide with the ICARS subscales, thus questioning the justification of ICARS subscore analysis in clinical trials.

KW - Clinical assessment

KW - ICARS

KW - Spinocerebellar ataxia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646918007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646918007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mds.20781

DO - 10.1002/mds.20781

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 699

EP - 704

JO - Movement Disorders

JF - Movement Disorders

SN - 0885-3185

IS - 5

ER -