Reliability and variability of impedance measured by real-time telemetry

Andreas Schuchert, Riccardo Cappato, Karl Heinz Kuck, Thomas Meinertz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With the aim to detect dysfunction of pacing leads, most present-day pacemakers measure pacing impedance by means of real-time telemetry. The recommended setting for impedance measurement is 5.0 V for pulse amplitude and 0.5 ms for pulse duration. Availability of reliable settings would facilitate impedance measurements during follow-up. The purpose of the present study was twofold: (1) to assess whether telemetrically measured impedance of the studied pacemaker is similar to impedance measured at implantation; and (2) to evaluate whether the pacemaker setting influences telemetrically measured impedance. Sixty-five consecutive patients receiving VVI(R) pacemakers were studied; in all patients, impedance measured at implantation by a pacing system analyzer was compared to measurements obtained telemetrically within 1 day after implantation. In 44 other patients, impedance was determined 3 months after implantation at 60 and 120 ppm (n = 44), twice at 60 ppm (n = 42), and 12 months after implantation at 60 ppm (n = 34). For each measurement, pulse amplitude was programmed to 0.8, 1.6, 2.5, 5.0, and 8.0 V, and pulse duration to 0.05, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 ms. Impedance at implantation (606 ± 113 ohms) did not differ from the data obtained with telemetry (629 ± 113 ohms; P = NS). Different pacing rates, repeat measurements, and follow-up time failed to show any influence on impedance. Measurement tolerance was <10% for 15 of 19 studied settings other than 5.0 V and 0.5 ms. Conclusion: The studied pacemakers provide reliable data for telemetrically measured impedance. Telemetrical impedance does not necessarily have to be measured at 5.0 V and 0.5 ms. These findings should be considered for measurement and interpretation of real-time telemetry impedance during follow-up.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)265-271
Number of pages7
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Telemetry
Electric Impedance

Keywords

  • follow-up
  • pacemaker telemetry
  • pacing impedance
  • pacing impulse
  • VVI pacemaker

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Reliability and variability of impedance measured by real-time telemetry. / Schuchert, Andreas; Cappato, Riccardo; Kuck, Karl Heinz; Meinertz, Thomas.

In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1996, p. 265-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schuchert, Andreas ; Cappato, Riccardo ; Kuck, Karl Heinz ; Meinertz, Thomas. / Reliability and variability of impedance measured by real-time telemetry. In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 1996 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 265-271.
@article{1e7f43fc4a734d368d7e936c7c25845d,
title = "Reliability and variability of impedance measured by real-time telemetry",
abstract = "With the aim to detect dysfunction of pacing leads, most present-day pacemakers measure pacing impedance by means of real-time telemetry. The recommended setting for impedance measurement is 5.0 V for pulse amplitude and 0.5 ms for pulse duration. Availability of reliable settings would facilitate impedance measurements during follow-up. The purpose of the present study was twofold: (1) to assess whether telemetrically measured impedance of the studied pacemaker is similar to impedance measured at implantation; and (2) to evaluate whether the pacemaker setting influences telemetrically measured impedance. Sixty-five consecutive patients receiving VVI(R) pacemakers were studied; in all patients, impedance measured at implantation by a pacing system analyzer was compared to measurements obtained telemetrically within 1 day after implantation. In 44 other patients, impedance was determined 3 months after implantation at 60 and 120 ppm (n = 44), twice at 60 ppm (n = 42), and 12 months after implantation at 60 ppm (n = 34). For each measurement, pulse amplitude was programmed to 0.8, 1.6, 2.5, 5.0, and 8.0 V, and pulse duration to 0.05, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 ms. Impedance at implantation (606 ± 113 ohms) did not differ from the data obtained with telemetry (629 ± 113 ohms; P = NS). Different pacing rates, repeat measurements, and follow-up time failed to show any influence on impedance. Measurement tolerance was <10{\%} for 15 of 19 studied settings other than 5.0 V and 0.5 ms. Conclusion: The studied pacemakers provide reliable data for telemetrically measured impedance. Telemetrical impedance does not necessarily have to be measured at 5.0 V and 0.5 ms. These findings should be considered for measurement and interpretation of real-time telemetry impedance during follow-up.",
keywords = "follow-up, pacemaker telemetry, pacing impedance, pacing impulse, VVI pacemaker",
author = "Andreas Schuchert and Riccardo Cappato and Kuck, {Karl Heinz} and Thomas Meinertz",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03326.x",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "265--271",
journal = "PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "0147-8389",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and variability of impedance measured by real-time telemetry

AU - Schuchert, Andreas

AU - Cappato, Riccardo

AU - Kuck, Karl Heinz

AU - Meinertz, Thomas

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - With the aim to detect dysfunction of pacing leads, most present-day pacemakers measure pacing impedance by means of real-time telemetry. The recommended setting for impedance measurement is 5.0 V for pulse amplitude and 0.5 ms for pulse duration. Availability of reliable settings would facilitate impedance measurements during follow-up. The purpose of the present study was twofold: (1) to assess whether telemetrically measured impedance of the studied pacemaker is similar to impedance measured at implantation; and (2) to evaluate whether the pacemaker setting influences telemetrically measured impedance. Sixty-five consecutive patients receiving VVI(R) pacemakers were studied; in all patients, impedance measured at implantation by a pacing system analyzer was compared to measurements obtained telemetrically within 1 day after implantation. In 44 other patients, impedance was determined 3 months after implantation at 60 and 120 ppm (n = 44), twice at 60 ppm (n = 42), and 12 months after implantation at 60 ppm (n = 34). For each measurement, pulse amplitude was programmed to 0.8, 1.6, 2.5, 5.0, and 8.0 V, and pulse duration to 0.05, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 ms. Impedance at implantation (606 ± 113 ohms) did not differ from the data obtained with telemetry (629 ± 113 ohms; P = NS). Different pacing rates, repeat measurements, and follow-up time failed to show any influence on impedance. Measurement tolerance was <10% for 15 of 19 studied settings other than 5.0 V and 0.5 ms. Conclusion: The studied pacemakers provide reliable data for telemetrically measured impedance. Telemetrical impedance does not necessarily have to be measured at 5.0 V and 0.5 ms. These findings should be considered for measurement and interpretation of real-time telemetry impedance during follow-up.

AB - With the aim to detect dysfunction of pacing leads, most present-day pacemakers measure pacing impedance by means of real-time telemetry. The recommended setting for impedance measurement is 5.0 V for pulse amplitude and 0.5 ms for pulse duration. Availability of reliable settings would facilitate impedance measurements during follow-up. The purpose of the present study was twofold: (1) to assess whether telemetrically measured impedance of the studied pacemaker is similar to impedance measured at implantation; and (2) to evaluate whether the pacemaker setting influences telemetrically measured impedance. Sixty-five consecutive patients receiving VVI(R) pacemakers were studied; in all patients, impedance measured at implantation by a pacing system analyzer was compared to measurements obtained telemetrically within 1 day after implantation. In 44 other patients, impedance was determined 3 months after implantation at 60 and 120 ppm (n = 44), twice at 60 ppm (n = 42), and 12 months after implantation at 60 ppm (n = 34). For each measurement, pulse amplitude was programmed to 0.8, 1.6, 2.5, 5.0, and 8.0 V, and pulse duration to 0.05, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 ms. Impedance at implantation (606 ± 113 ohms) did not differ from the data obtained with telemetry (629 ± 113 ohms; P = NS). Different pacing rates, repeat measurements, and follow-up time failed to show any influence on impedance. Measurement tolerance was <10% for 15 of 19 studied settings other than 5.0 V and 0.5 ms. Conclusion: The studied pacemakers provide reliable data for telemetrically measured impedance. Telemetrical impedance does not necessarily have to be measured at 5.0 V and 0.5 ms. These findings should be considered for measurement and interpretation of real-time telemetry impedance during follow-up.

KW - follow-up

KW - pacemaker telemetry

KW - pacing impedance

KW - pacing impulse

KW - VVI pacemaker

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029919690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029919690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03326.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03326.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 8657585

AN - SCOPUS:0029919690

VL - 19

SP - 265

EP - 271

JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 0147-8389

IS - 3

ER -