Reliability of colposcopy during pregnancy

Andrea Ciavattini, Matteo Serri, Jacopo Di Giuseppe, Carlo A. Liverani, Maria G. Fallani, Dimitrios Tsiroglou, Maria Papiccio, Giovanni Dellin Carpini, Annalisa Pieralli, Nicolò Clemente, Francesco Sopracordevole

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the reliability of colposcopy during pregnancy and to evaluate the concordance between colposcopic patterns and histopathological findings in these women. Study design: Multicenter observational study of women diagnosed with an abnormal cervical cytology, who subsequently underwent a colposcopic evaluation with cervical biopsy during pregnancy. The “colpo-histopathological concordance” was evaluated. The “colposcopic overestimation and underestimation” were evaluated as well. Results: 69 women, fulfilling the study inclusion/exclusion criteria, constituted the study cohort. Among them, on colposcopic examination, 14 women (20.3%) showed “grade I abnormal colposcopic findings” 52 (75.4%) showed “grade II abnormal colposcopic findings” and the remaining 3 women (4.3%) had a “suspicious for invasion” colposcopy. The histopathological diagnosis showed 2 negative biopsies, 12 (17.4%) cases of CIN1, 50 (72.5%) cases of CIN2 and 5 (7.2%) cases of invasive cervical cancer. We found a colposcopic overestimation in 10 cases (14.5%), underestimation in 12 cases (17.4%), and a concordance in 47 cases (68.1%). A better reliability of colposcopy in women in the firsts two trimesters and in particular in women ≤20 weeks pregnant was found (Cohen's weighted kappa: 0.65). Conclusions: When performed by gynecologists with expertise, colposcopy is a reliable diagnostic tool, even during pregnancy. Whenever possible, a colposcopic evaluation during the first half of pregnancy is preferable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-81
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume229
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Colposcopy
Pregnancy
Biopsy
First Pregnancy Trimester
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Multicenter Studies
Observational Studies
Cell Biology
Cohort Studies

Keywords

  • Cervical intraepithelial lesions
  • CIN
  • Colposcopy
  • Pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Reliability of colposcopy during pregnancy. / Ciavattini, Andrea; Serri, Matteo; Di Giuseppe, Jacopo; Liverani, Carlo A.; Fallani, Maria G.; Tsiroglou, Dimitrios; Papiccio, Maria; Dellin Carpini, Giovanni; Pieralli, Annalisa; Clemente, Nicolò; Sopracordevole, Francesco.

In: European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Vol. 229, 01.10.2018, p. 76-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ciavattini, A, Serri, M, Di Giuseppe, J, Liverani, CA, Fallani, MG, Tsiroglou, D, Papiccio, M, Dellin Carpini, G, Pieralli, A, Clemente, N & Sopracordevole, F 2018, 'Reliability of colposcopy during pregnancy', European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 229, pp. 76-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.07.029
Ciavattini, Andrea ; Serri, Matteo ; Di Giuseppe, Jacopo ; Liverani, Carlo A. ; Fallani, Maria G. ; Tsiroglou, Dimitrios ; Papiccio, Maria ; Dellin Carpini, Giovanni ; Pieralli, Annalisa ; Clemente, Nicolò ; Sopracordevole, Francesco. / Reliability of colposcopy during pregnancy. In: European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2018 ; Vol. 229. pp. 76-81.
@article{28fbe69a18894b1f9144afb0a7e05eac,
title = "Reliability of colposcopy during pregnancy",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate the reliability of colposcopy during pregnancy and to evaluate the concordance between colposcopic patterns and histopathological findings in these women. Study design: Multicenter observational study of women diagnosed with an abnormal cervical cytology, who subsequently underwent a colposcopic evaluation with cervical biopsy during pregnancy. The “colpo-histopathological concordance” was evaluated. The “colposcopic overestimation and underestimation” were evaluated as well. Results: 69 women, fulfilling the study inclusion/exclusion criteria, constituted the study cohort. Among them, on colposcopic examination, 14 women (20.3{\%}) showed “grade I abnormal colposcopic findings” 52 (75.4{\%}) showed “grade II abnormal colposcopic findings” and the remaining 3 women (4.3{\%}) had a “suspicious for invasion” colposcopy. The histopathological diagnosis showed 2 negative biopsies, 12 (17.4{\%}) cases of CIN1, 50 (72.5{\%}) cases of CIN2 and 5 (7.2{\%}) cases of invasive cervical cancer. We found a colposcopic overestimation in 10 cases (14.5{\%}), underestimation in 12 cases (17.4{\%}), and a concordance in 47 cases (68.1{\%}). A better reliability of colposcopy in women in the firsts two trimesters and in particular in women ≤20 weeks pregnant was found (Cohen's weighted kappa: 0.65). Conclusions: When performed by gynecologists with expertise, colposcopy is a reliable diagnostic tool, even during pregnancy. Whenever possible, a colposcopic evaluation during the first half of pregnancy is preferable.",
keywords = "Cervical intraepithelial lesions, CIN, Colposcopy, Pregnancy",
author = "Andrea Ciavattini and Matteo Serri and {Di Giuseppe}, Jacopo and Liverani, {Carlo A.} and Fallani, {Maria G.} and Dimitrios Tsiroglou and Maria Papiccio and {Dellin Carpini}, Giovanni and Annalisa Pieralli and Nicol{\`o} Clemente and Francesco Sopracordevole",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.07.029",
language = "English",
volume = "229",
pages = "76--81",
journal = "European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology",
issn = "0028-2243",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of colposcopy during pregnancy

AU - Ciavattini, Andrea

AU - Serri, Matteo

AU - Di Giuseppe, Jacopo

AU - Liverani, Carlo A.

AU - Fallani, Maria G.

AU - Tsiroglou, Dimitrios

AU - Papiccio, Maria

AU - Dellin Carpini, Giovanni

AU - Pieralli, Annalisa

AU - Clemente, Nicolò

AU - Sopracordevole, Francesco

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Objective: To investigate the reliability of colposcopy during pregnancy and to evaluate the concordance between colposcopic patterns and histopathological findings in these women. Study design: Multicenter observational study of women diagnosed with an abnormal cervical cytology, who subsequently underwent a colposcopic evaluation with cervical biopsy during pregnancy. The “colpo-histopathological concordance” was evaluated. The “colposcopic overestimation and underestimation” were evaluated as well. Results: 69 women, fulfilling the study inclusion/exclusion criteria, constituted the study cohort. Among them, on colposcopic examination, 14 women (20.3%) showed “grade I abnormal colposcopic findings” 52 (75.4%) showed “grade II abnormal colposcopic findings” and the remaining 3 women (4.3%) had a “suspicious for invasion” colposcopy. The histopathological diagnosis showed 2 negative biopsies, 12 (17.4%) cases of CIN1, 50 (72.5%) cases of CIN2 and 5 (7.2%) cases of invasive cervical cancer. We found a colposcopic overestimation in 10 cases (14.5%), underestimation in 12 cases (17.4%), and a concordance in 47 cases (68.1%). A better reliability of colposcopy in women in the firsts two trimesters and in particular in women ≤20 weeks pregnant was found (Cohen's weighted kappa: 0.65). Conclusions: When performed by gynecologists with expertise, colposcopy is a reliable diagnostic tool, even during pregnancy. Whenever possible, a colposcopic evaluation during the first half of pregnancy is preferable.

AB - Objective: To investigate the reliability of colposcopy during pregnancy and to evaluate the concordance between colposcopic patterns and histopathological findings in these women. Study design: Multicenter observational study of women diagnosed with an abnormal cervical cytology, who subsequently underwent a colposcopic evaluation with cervical biopsy during pregnancy. The “colpo-histopathological concordance” was evaluated. The “colposcopic overestimation and underestimation” were evaluated as well. Results: 69 women, fulfilling the study inclusion/exclusion criteria, constituted the study cohort. Among them, on colposcopic examination, 14 women (20.3%) showed “grade I abnormal colposcopic findings” 52 (75.4%) showed “grade II abnormal colposcopic findings” and the remaining 3 women (4.3%) had a “suspicious for invasion” colposcopy. The histopathological diagnosis showed 2 negative biopsies, 12 (17.4%) cases of CIN1, 50 (72.5%) cases of CIN2 and 5 (7.2%) cases of invasive cervical cancer. We found a colposcopic overestimation in 10 cases (14.5%), underestimation in 12 cases (17.4%), and a concordance in 47 cases (68.1%). A better reliability of colposcopy in women in the firsts two trimesters and in particular in women ≤20 weeks pregnant was found (Cohen's weighted kappa: 0.65). Conclusions: When performed by gynecologists with expertise, colposcopy is a reliable diagnostic tool, even during pregnancy. Whenever possible, a colposcopic evaluation during the first half of pregnancy is preferable.

KW - Cervical intraepithelial lesions

KW - CIN

KW - Colposcopy

KW - Pregnancy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051368344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051368344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.07.029

DO - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.07.029

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051368344

VL - 229

SP - 76

EP - 81

JO - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

JF - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

SN - 0028-2243

ER -