Determinazione del volume renale con ecotomografia 3D

A. Brancaforte; S. Serantoni; F. Silva Barbosa; G. Di Leo; F. Sardanelli; G. P. Cornalba

doi:10.1007/s11547-011-0691-8

Determinazione del volume renale con ecotomografia 3D

Translated title of the contribution: Renal volume assessment with 3D ultrasound

A. Brancaforte, S. Serantoni, F. Silva Barbosa, G. Di Leo, F. Sardanelli, G. P. Cornalba

IRCCS Policlinico San Donato

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine the accuracy of 3D ultrasound (US) in assessing renal volume, with multislice computed tomography (MSCT) considered as the gold standard. Materials and methods: Forty-nine patients (30 men, 19 women; age range 30-82 years) underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced MSCT and 3D-US performed with a 3.5-MHz 3D/4D convex-array probe. The results of the two modalities were compared with the Wilcoxon test. Variability between the two measurements was determined with the Bland-Altman method and reported in terms of bias and coefficient of repeatability (CoR). Results: Mean values obtained were 210 ml with MSCT and 192 ml with 3D-US (p

Translated title of the contribution	Renal volume assessment with 3D ultrasound
Original language	Italian
Pages (from-to)	1095-1104
Number of pages	10
Journal	Radiologia Medica
Volume	116
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-011-0691-8
Publication status	Published - Oct 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Access to Document

10.1007/s11547-011-0691-8

Cite this

@article{018abfe24c73406fb492ccb542075509,

title = "Determinazione del volume renale con ecotomografia 3D",

abstract = "Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine the accuracy of 3D ultrasound (US) in assessing renal volume, with multislice computed tomography (MSCT) considered as the gold standard. Materials and methods: Forty-nine patients (30 men, 19 women; age range 30-82 years) underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced MSCT and 3D-US performed with a 3.5-MHz 3D/4D convex-array probe. The results of the two modalities were compared with the Wilcoxon test. Variability between the two measurements was determined with the Bland-Altman method and reported in terms of bias and coefficient of repeatability (CoR). Results: Mean values obtained were 210 ml with MSCT and 192 ml with 3D-US (p",

keywords = "3DMSCT, Renal volume, Ultrasound",

author = "A. Brancaforte and S. Serantoni and {Silva Barbosa}, F. and {Di Leo}, G. and F. Sardanelli and Cornalba, {G. P.}",

year = "2011",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1007/s11547-011-0691-8",

language = "Italian",

volume = "116",

pages = "1095--1104",

journal = "Radiologia Medica",

issn = "0033-8362",

publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinazione del volume renale con ecotomografia 3D

AU - Brancaforte, A.

AU - Serantoni, S.

AU - Silva Barbosa, F.

AU - Di Leo, G.

AU - Sardanelli, F.

AU - Cornalba, G. P.

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine the accuracy of 3D ultrasound (US) in assessing renal volume, with multislice computed tomography (MSCT) considered as the gold standard. Materials and methods: Forty-nine patients (30 men, 19 women; age range 30-82 years) underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced MSCT and 3D-US performed with a 3.5-MHz 3D/4D convex-array probe. The results of the two modalities were compared with the Wilcoxon test. Variability between the two measurements was determined with the Bland-Altman method and reported in terms of bias and coefficient of repeatability (CoR). Results: Mean values obtained were 210 ml with MSCT and 192 ml with 3D-US (p

AB - Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine the accuracy of 3D ultrasound (US) in assessing renal volume, with multislice computed tomography (MSCT) considered as the gold standard. Materials and methods: Forty-nine patients (30 men, 19 women; age range 30-82 years) underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced MSCT and 3D-US performed with a 3.5-MHz 3D/4D convex-array probe. The results of the two modalities were compared with the Wilcoxon test. Variability between the two measurements was determined with the Bland-Altman method and reported in terms of bias and coefficient of repeatability (CoR). Results: Mean values obtained were 210 ml with MSCT and 192 ml with 3D-US (p

KW - 3DMSCT

KW - Renal volume

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83055170955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83055170955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11547-011-0691-8

DO - 10.1007/s11547-011-0691-8

M3 - Articolo

C2 - 21643638

AN - SCOPUS:83055170955

VL - 116

SP - 1095

EP - 1104

JO - Radiologia Medica

JF - Radiologia Medica

SN - 0033-8362

IS - 7

ER -

Determinazione del volume renale con ecotomografia 3D

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this