Reproducibility of clinician-friendly physical performance measures in individuals with obesity

Nicola A. Maffiuletti, Gabriella Tringali, Alessandra Patrizi, Fiorenza Agosti, Alessandro Sartorio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the reproducibility (reliability and agreement) of different physical performance measures in individuals with obesity. Methods: Forty subjects (20 men, 20 women), mean age 29 years, mean body mass index (BMI) 42 kg/m2 completed several clinician-friendly performancebased tests (walking, stair-climbing, sit-To-stand, static balance, flexibility and strength) on 2 different occasions (test-retest design). Intraclass correlation coefficients (reliability) and smallest detectable changes (agreement) were calculated for each outcome measure. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients were relatively high (range 0.84-0.94) for all the performance-based measures (i.e. acceptable reliability). Smallest detectable changes were overall quite high and beyond the arbitrarily-defined minimal clinically important changes (i.e. poor agreement) for 3 out of 8 variables (sit-To-stand time, time-in-balance with eyes closed, and sit-And-reach distance). Conclusion: The clinician-friendly performance-based tests for individuals with obesity considered in this study appear legitimate for discriminative purposes, such as in cross-sectional studies. However, for longitudinal assessments (evaluative purposes), some measures should be used with greater caution due to limited agreement. Careful consideration should be given to the evaluation of physical performance in people with obesity, particularly in the context of conservative or surgical treatment for weight loss.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)677-681
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume49
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Obesity
Walking
Weight Loss
Body Mass Index
Cross-Sectional Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Therapeutics
Stair Climbing

Keywords

  • Obesity
  • Outcomes
  • Physical performance
  • Reproducibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Reproducibility of clinician-friendly physical performance measures in individuals with obesity. / Maffiuletti, Nicola A.; Tringali, Gabriella; Patrizi, Alessandra; Agosti, Fiorenza; Sartorio, Alessandro.

In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 8, 01.01.2017, p. 677-681.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{79db710427a34d918e9c0c9835f69e8d,
title = "Reproducibility of clinician-friendly physical performance measures in individuals with obesity",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the reproducibility (reliability and agreement) of different physical performance measures in individuals with obesity. Methods: Forty subjects (20 men, 20 women), mean age 29 years, mean body mass index (BMI) 42 kg/m2 completed several clinician-friendly performancebased tests (walking, stair-climbing, sit-To-stand, static balance, flexibility and strength) on 2 different occasions (test-retest design). Intraclass correlation coefficients (reliability) and smallest detectable changes (agreement) were calculated for each outcome measure. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients were relatively high (range 0.84-0.94) for all the performance-based measures (i.e. acceptable reliability). Smallest detectable changes were overall quite high and beyond the arbitrarily-defined minimal clinically important changes (i.e. poor agreement) for 3 out of 8 variables (sit-To-stand time, time-in-balance with eyes closed, and sit-And-reach distance). Conclusion: The clinician-friendly performance-based tests for individuals with obesity considered in this study appear legitimate for discriminative purposes, such as in cross-sectional studies. However, for longitudinal assessments (evaluative purposes), some measures should be used with greater caution due to limited agreement. Careful consideration should be given to the evaluation of physical performance in people with obesity, particularly in the context of conservative or surgical treatment for weight loss.",
keywords = "Obesity, Outcomes, Physical performance, Reproducibility",
author = "Maffiuletti, {Nicola A.} and Gabriella Tringali and Alessandra Patrizi and Fiorenza Agosti and Alessandro Sartorio",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2340/16501977-2263",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "677--681",
journal = "Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "1650-1977",
publisher = "Foundation for Rehabilitation Information",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility of clinician-friendly physical performance measures in individuals with obesity

AU - Maffiuletti, Nicola A.

AU - Tringali, Gabriella

AU - Patrizi, Alessandra

AU - Agosti, Fiorenza

AU - Sartorio, Alessandro

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the reproducibility (reliability and agreement) of different physical performance measures in individuals with obesity. Methods: Forty subjects (20 men, 20 women), mean age 29 years, mean body mass index (BMI) 42 kg/m2 completed several clinician-friendly performancebased tests (walking, stair-climbing, sit-To-stand, static balance, flexibility and strength) on 2 different occasions (test-retest design). Intraclass correlation coefficients (reliability) and smallest detectable changes (agreement) were calculated for each outcome measure. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients were relatively high (range 0.84-0.94) for all the performance-based measures (i.e. acceptable reliability). Smallest detectable changes were overall quite high and beyond the arbitrarily-defined minimal clinically important changes (i.e. poor agreement) for 3 out of 8 variables (sit-To-stand time, time-in-balance with eyes closed, and sit-And-reach distance). Conclusion: The clinician-friendly performance-based tests for individuals with obesity considered in this study appear legitimate for discriminative purposes, such as in cross-sectional studies. However, for longitudinal assessments (evaluative purposes), some measures should be used with greater caution due to limited agreement. Careful consideration should be given to the evaluation of physical performance in people with obesity, particularly in the context of conservative or surgical treatment for weight loss.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the reproducibility (reliability and agreement) of different physical performance measures in individuals with obesity. Methods: Forty subjects (20 men, 20 women), mean age 29 years, mean body mass index (BMI) 42 kg/m2 completed several clinician-friendly performancebased tests (walking, stair-climbing, sit-To-stand, static balance, flexibility and strength) on 2 different occasions (test-retest design). Intraclass correlation coefficients (reliability) and smallest detectable changes (agreement) were calculated for each outcome measure. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients were relatively high (range 0.84-0.94) for all the performance-based measures (i.e. acceptable reliability). Smallest detectable changes were overall quite high and beyond the arbitrarily-defined minimal clinically important changes (i.e. poor agreement) for 3 out of 8 variables (sit-To-stand time, time-in-balance with eyes closed, and sit-And-reach distance). Conclusion: The clinician-friendly performance-based tests for individuals with obesity considered in this study appear legitimate for discriminative purposes, such as in cross-sectional studies. However, for longitudinal assessments (evaluative purposes), some measures should be used with greater caution due to limited agreement. Careful consideration should be given to the evaluation of physical performance in people with obesity, particularly in the context of conservative or surgical treatment for weight loss.

KW - Obesity

KW - Outcomes

KW - Physical performance

KW - Reproducibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028700138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028700138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2340/16501977-2263

DO - 10.2340/16501977-2263

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85028700138

VL - 49

SP - 677

EP - 681

JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 1650-1977

IS - 8

ER -