Research Misconduct in the Age of Open Science: The Case of STAP Stem Cells

Mianna Meskus, Luca Marelli, Giuseppe D'Agostino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In early 2014, Dr Haruko Obokata and her co-authors caused a global media storm by publishing two scientific papers in Nature on stem cells. The papers proposed a surprisingly simple new method called stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency (STAP) to generate pluripotent stem cells for research purposes in a fast and inexpensive way. To the dismay of many, both papers were retracted within six months of their release due to data fabrication and falsification. The rise and fall of the STAP research illustrates the impacts of open science practices of quality control and validation on new scientific claims. In the STAP case, collective action generated through two online forums—the Knoepfler Lab Stem Cell Blog and PubPeer—exposed not only data manipulation in the two papers but also the irreproducibility of the purported new cellular reprogramming method. The case brings to the fore the tentative possibilities as well as potential pitfalls of ‘accelerated virtual witnessing’ through crowdsourced post-publication peer reviews that value accessibility and inclusiveness. Indeed, it calls for empirically grounded discussion on the ongoing reconfiguration of the shared system of values and norms or the moral economy of science.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalScience as Culture
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - May 4 2017

Fingerprint

Scientific Misconduct
Stem cells
stimulus
Stem Cells
Blogging
Stem Cell Research
Pluripotent Stem Cells
Peer Review
science
Quality Control
falsification
Publications
Blogs
quality control
peer review
weblog
collective behavior
Quality control
manipulation
Values

Keywords

  • moral economy of science
  • open science
  • scientific misconduct
  • STAP
  • stem cell research
  • technologies of virtual witnessing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Health(social science)
  • Cultural Studies
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Research Misconduct in the Age of Open Science : The Case of STAP Stem Cells. / Meskus, Mianna; Marelli, Luca; D'Agostino, Giuseppe.

In: Science as Culture, 04.05.2017, p. 1-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{35dd7a32ef73443e872ed208983d30fe,
title = "Research Misconduct in the Age of Open Science: The Case of STAP Stem Cells",
abstract = "In early 2014, Dr Haruko Obokata and her co-authors caused a global media storm by publishing two scientific papers in Nature on stem cells. The papers proposed a surprisingly simple new method called stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency (STAP) to generate pluripotent stem cells for research purposes in a fast and inexpensive way. To the dismay of many, both papers were retracted within six months of their release due to data fabrication and falsification. The rise and fall of the STAP research illustrates the impacts of open science practices of quality control and validation on new scientific claims. In the STAP case, collective action generated through two online forums—the Knoepfler Lab Stem Cell Blog and PubPeer—exposed not only data manipulation in the two papers but also the irreproducibility of the purported new cellular reprogramming method. The case brings to the fore the tentative possibilities as well as potential pitfalls of ‘accelerated virtual witnessing’ through crowdsourced post-publication peer reviews that value accessibility and inclusiveness. Indeed, it calls for empirically grounded discussion on the ongoing reconfiguration of the shared system of values and norms or the moral economy of science.",
keywords = "moral economy of science, open science, scientific misconduct, STAP, stem cell research, technologies of virtual witnessing",
author = "Mianna Meskus and Luca Marelli and Giuseppe D'Agostino",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/09505431.2017.1316975",
language = "English",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "Science as Culture",
issn = "0950-5431",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research Misconduct in the Age of Open Science

T2 - The Case of STAP Stem Cells

AU - Meskus, Mianna

AU - Marelli, Luca

AU - D'Agostino, Giuseppe

PY - 2017/5/4

Y1 - 2017/5/4

N2 - In early 2014, Dr Haruko Obokata and her co-authors caused a global media storm by publishing two scientific papers in Nature on stem cells. The papers proposed a surprisingly simple new method called stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency (STAP) to generate pluripotent stem cells for research purposes in a fast and inexpensive way. To the dismay of many, both papers were retracted within six months of their release due to data fabrication and falsification. The rise and fall of the STAP research illustrates the impacts of open science practices of quality control and validation on new scientific claims. In the STAP case, collective action generated through two online forums—the Knoepfler Lab Stem Cell Blog and PubPeer—exposed not only data manipulation in the two papers but also the irreproducibility of the purported new cellular reprogramming method. The case brings to the fore the tentative possibilities as well as potential pitfalls of ‘accelerated virtual witnessing’ through crowdsourced post-publication peer reviews that value accessibility and inclusiveness. Indeed, it calls for empirically grounded discussion on the ongoing reconfiguration of the shared system of values and norms or the moral economy of science.

AB - In early 2014, Dr Haruko Obokata and her co-authors caused a global media storm by publishing two scientific papers in Nature on stem cells. The papers proposed a surprisingly simple new method called stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency (STAP) to generate pluripotent stem cells for research purposes in a fast and inexpensive way. To the dismay of many, both papers were retracted within six months of their release due to data fabrication and falsification. The rise and fall of the STAP research illustrates the impacts of open science practices of quality control and validation on new scientific claims. In the STAP case, collective action generated through two online forums—the Knoepfler Lab Stem Cell Blog and PubPeer—exposed not only data manipulation in the two papers but also the irreproducibility of the purported new cellular reprogramming method. The case brings to the fore the tentative possibilities as well as potential pitfalls of ‘accelerated virtual witnessing’ through crowdsourced post-publication peer reviews that value accessibility and inclusiveness. Indeed, it calls for empirically grounded discussion on the ongoing reconfiguration of the shared system of values and norms or the moral economy of science.

KW - moral economy of science

KW - open science

KW - scientific misconduct

KW - STAP

KW - stem cell research

KW - technologies of virtual witnessing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018388674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018388674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09505431.2017.1316975

DO - 10.1080/09505431.2017.1316975

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85018388674

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - Science as Culture

JF - Science as Culture

SN - 0950-5431

ER -