Research studies on patients' illness experience using the Narrative Medicine approach: A systematic review

Chiara Fioretti, Ketti Mazzocco, Silvia Riva, Serena Oliveri, Marianna Masiero, Gabriella Pravettoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Since its birth about 30 years ago, Narrative Medicine approach has increased in popularity in the medical context as well as in other disciplines. This paper aims to review Narrative Medicine research studies on patients' and their caregivers' illness experience. Setting and participants: MEDLINE, Psycinfo, EBSCO Psychological and Behavioural Science, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases were searched to identify all the research studies which focused on the Narrative Medicine approach reported in the title, in the abstract and in the keywords the words 'Narrative Medicine' or 'Narrative-based Medicine'. Primary and secondary outcome measures: number of participants, type of disease, race and age of participants, type of study, dependent variables, intervention methods, assessment. Results: Of the 325 titles screened, we identified 10 research articles fitting the inclusion criteria. Our systematic review showed that research on Narrative Medicine has no common specific methodology: narrative in Medicine is used as an intervention protocol as well as an assessment tool. Patients' characteristics, types of disease and data analysis procedures differ among the screened studies. Conclusions: Narrative Medicine research in medical practice needs to find clear and specific protocols to deepen the impact of narrative on medical practice and on patients' lives.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere011220
JournalBMJ Open
Volume6
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Narration
Research
Behavioral Sciences
MEDLINE
Caregivers
Libraries
Biomedical Research
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Parturition
Databases
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Research studies on patients' illness experience using the Narrative Medicine approach : A systematic review. / Fioretti, Chiara; Mazzocco, Ketti; Riva, Silvia; Oliveri, Serena; Masiero, Marianna; Pravettoni, Gabriella.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 6, No. 7, e011220, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aeff7daed90a46d797c5875afc4f3e2f,
title = "Research studies on patients' illness experience using the Narrative Medicine approach: A systematic review",
abstract = "Objective: Since its birth about 30 years ago, Narrative Medicine approach has increased in popularity in the medical context as well as in other disciplines. This paper aims to review Narrative Medicine research studies on patients' and their caregivers' illness experience. Setting and participants: MEDLINE, Psycinfo, EBSCO Psychological and Behavioural Science, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases were searched to identify all the research studies which focused on the Narrative Medicine approach reported in the title, in the abstract and in the keywords the words 'Narrative Medicine' or 'Narrative-based Medicine'. Primary and secondary outcome measures: number of participants, type of disease, race and age of participants, type of study, dependent variables, intervention methods, assessment. Results: Of the 325 titles screened, we identified 10 research articles fitting the inclusion criteria. Our systematic review showed that research on Narrative Medicine has no common specific methodology: narrative in Medicine is used as an intervention protocol as well as an assessment tool. Patients' characteristics, types of disease and data analysis procedures differ among the screened studies. Conclusions: Narrative Medicine research in medical practice needs to find clear and specific protocols to deepen the impact of narrative on medical practice and on patients' lives.",
author = "Chiara Fioretti and Ketti Mazzocco and Silvia Riva and Serena Oliveri and Marianna Masiero and Gabriella Pravettoni",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011220",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research studies on patients' illness experience using the Narrative Medicine approach

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Fioretti, Chiara

AU - Mazzocco, Ketti

AU - Riva, Silvia

AU - Oliveri, Serena

AU - Masiero, Marianna

AU - Pravettoni, Gabriella

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Objective: Since its birth about 30 years ago, Narrative Medicine approach has increased in popularity in the medical context as well as in other disciplines. This paper aims to review Narrative Medicine research studies on patients' and their caregivers' illness experience. Setting and participants: MEDLINE, Psycinfo, EBSCO Psychological and Behavioural Science, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases were searched to identify all the research studies which focused on the Narrative Medicine approach reported in the title, in the abstract and in the keywords the words 'Narrative Medicine' or 'Narrative-based Medicine'. Primary and secondary outcome measures: number of participants, type of disease, race and age of participants, type of study, dependent variables, intervention methods, assessment. Results: Of the 325 titles screened, we identified 10 research articles fitting the inclusion criteria. Our systematic review showed that research on Narrative Medicine has no common specific methodology: narrative in Medicine is used as an intervention protocol as well as an assessment tool. Patients' characteristics, types of disease and data analysis procedures differ among the screened studies. Conclusions: Narrative Medicine research in medical practice needs to find clear and specific protocols to deepen the impact of narrative on medical practice and on patients' lives.

AB - Objective: Since its birth about 30 years ago, Narrative Medicine approach has increased in popularity in the medical context as well as in other disciplines. This paper aims to review Narrative Medicine research studies on patients' and their caregivers' illness experience. Setting and participants: MEDLINE, Psycinfo, EBSCO Psychological and Behavioural Science, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases were searched to identify all the research studies which focused on the Narrative Medicine approach reported in the title, in the abstract and in the keywords the words 'Narrative Medicine' or 'Narrative-based Medicine'. Primary and secondary outcome measures: number of participants, type of disease, race and age of participants, type of study, dependent variables, intervention methods, assessment. Results: Of the 325 titles screened, we identified 10 research articles fitting the inclusion criteria. Our systematic review showed that research on Narrative Medicine has no common specific methodology: narrative in Medicine is used as an intervention protocol as well as an assessment tool. Patients' characteristics, types of disease and data analysis procedures differ among the screened studies. Conclusions: Narrative Medicine research in medical practice needs to find clear and specific protocols to deepen the impact of narrative on medical practice and on patients' lives.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979596400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979596400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011220

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011220

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84979596400

VL - 6

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 7

M1 - e011220

ER -