Results of DEMETRA models

Nicolas Amaury, Emilio Benfenati, Elena Boriani, Mosè Casalegno, Antonio Chana, Qasim Chaudhry, Jacques R. Chrétien, Jane Cotterill, Frank Lemke, Nadège Piclin, Marco Pintore, Chiara Porcelli, Nicholas Price, Alessandra Roncaglioni, Andrey Toropov

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The overall process in the context of DEMETRA models involves a careful selection of the data, a check of the chemical structures, and the calculation of thousands of descriptors and fragments, and on that basis a development of hundreds of models. Current computer techniques allow the exploration of a huge space of possibilities in a short time, facilitating the task. This chapter explores a full battery of models. Many of the models are not valid, and the performances are poor. However, a certain number of models give interesting results. Good results are obtained with the use of different models and different chemical descriptors. The heterogeneity of the methodologies increases the robustness of the results, once comparable results are obtained. Indeed, one model can support the other, especially when the starting point and methodology are different.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationQuantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) for Pesticide Regulatory Purposes
PublisherElsevier
Pages201-281
Number of pages81
ISBN (Print)9780444527103
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Chemical Models
computer techniques
chemical structure
methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Amaury, N., Benfenati, E., Boriani, E., Casalegno, M., Chana, A., Chaudhry, Q., ... Toropov, A. (2007). Results of DEMETRA models. In Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) for Pesticide Regulatory Purposes (pp. 201-281). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044452710-3/50009-4

Results of DEMETRA models. / Amaury, Nicolas; Benfenati, Emilio; Boriani, Elena; Casalegno, Mosè; Chana, Antonio; Chaudhry, Qasim; Chrétien, Jacques R.; Cotterill, Jane; Lemke, Frank; Piclin, Nadège; Pintore, Marco; Porcelli, Chiara; Price, Nicholas; Roncaglioni, Alessandra; Toropov, Andrey.

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) for Pesticide Regulatory Purposes. Elsevier, 2007. p. 201-281.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Amaury, N, Benfenati, E, Boriani, E, Casalegno, M, Chana, A, Chaudhry, Q, Chrétien, JR, Cotterill, J, Lemke, F, Piclin, N, Pintore, M, Porcelli, C, Price, N, Roncaglioni, A & Toropov, A 2007, Results of DEMETRA models. in Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) for Pesticide Regulatory Purposes. Elsevier, pp. 201-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044452710-3/50009-4
Amaury N, Benfenati E, Boriani E, Casalegno M, Chana A, Chaudhry Q et al. Results of DEMETRA models. In Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) for Pesticide Regulatory Purposes. Elsevier. 2007. p. 201-281 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044452710-3/50009-4
Amaury, Nicolas ; Benfenati, Emilio ; Boriani, Elena ; Casalegno, Mosè ; Chana, Antonio ; Chaudhry, Qasim ; Chrétien, Jacques R. ; Cotterill, Jane ; Lemke, Frank ; Piclin, Nadège ; Pintore, Marco ; Porcelli, Chiara ; Price, Nicholas ; Roncaglioni, Alessandra ; Toropov, Andrey. / Results of DEMETRA models. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) for Pesticide Regulatory Purposes. Elsevier, 2007. pp. 201-281
@inbook{3b77e3f00e354d3a8a944b4a43fbc123,
title = "Results of DEMETRA models",
abstract = "The overall process in the context of DEMETRA models involves a careful selection of the data, a check of the chemical structures, and the calculation of thousands of descriptors and fragments, and on that basis a development of hundreds of models. Current computer techniques allow the exploration of a huge space of possibilities in a short time, facilitating the task. This chapter explores a full battery of models. Many of the models are not valid, and the performances are poor. However, a certain number of models give interesting results. Good results are obtained with the use of different models and different chemical descriptors. The heterogeneity of the methodologies increases the robustness of the results, once comparable results are obtained. Indeed, one model can support the other, especially when the starting point and methodology are different.",
author = "Nicolas Amaury and Emilio Benfenati and Elena Boriani and Mos{\`e} Casalegno and Antonio Chana and Qasim Chaudhry and Chr{\'e}tien, {Jacques R.} and Jane Cotterill and Frank Lemke and Nad{\`e}ge Piclin and Marco Pintore and Chiara Porcelli and Nicholas Price and Alessandra Roncaglioni and Andrey Toropov",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1016/B978-044452710-3/50009-4",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780444527103",
pages = "201--281",
booktitle = "Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) for Pesticide Regulatory Purposes",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Results of DEMETRA models

AU - Amaury, Nicolas

AU - Benfenati, Emilio

AU - Boriani, Elena

AU - Casalegno, Mosè

AU - Chana, Antonio

AU - Chaudhry, Qasim

AU - Chrétien, Jacques R.

AU - Cotterill, Jane

AU - Lemke, Frank

AU - Piclin, Nadège

AU - Pintore, Marco

AU - Porcelli, Chiara

AU - Price, Nicholas

AU - Roncaglioni, Alessandra

AU - Toropov, Andrey

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The overall process in the context of DEMETRA models involves a careful selection of the data, a check of the chemical structures, and the calculation of thousands of descriptors and fragments, and on that basis a development of hundreds of models. Current computer techniques allow the exploration of a huge space of possibilities in a short time, facilitating the task. This chapter explores a full battery of models. Many of the models are not valid, and the performances are poor. However, a certain number of models give interesting results. Good results are obtained with the use of different models and different chemical descriptors. The heterogeneity of the methodologies increases the robustness of the results, once comparable results are obtained. Indeed, one model can support the other, especially when the starting point and methodology are different.

AB - The overall process in the context of DEMETRA models involves a careful selection of the data, a check of the chemical structures, and the calculation of thousands of descriptors and fragments, and on that basis a development of hundreds of models. Current computer techniques allow the exploration of a huge space of possibilities in a short time, facilitating the task. This chapter explores a full battery of models. Many of the models are not valid, and the performances are poor. However, a certain number of models give interesting results. Good results are obtained with the use of different models and different chemical descriptors. The heterogeneity of the methodologies increases the robustness of the results, once comparable results are obtained. Indeed, one model can support the other, especially when the starting point and methodology are different.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42049098913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42049098913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-044452710-3/50009-4

DO - 10.1016/B978-044452710-3/50009-4

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:42049098913

SN - 9780444527103

SP - 201

EP - 281

BT - Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) for Pesticide Regulatory Purposes

PB - Elsevier

ER -