Reticulocyte quantification by Coulter MAXM VCS (volume, conductivity, light scatter) technology

Mauro Buttarello, Pietro Bulian, Marina De Prà, Pietro Barbera, Paolo Rizzotti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this study the ability of the Coulter MAXM analyzer to quantify reticulocytes was evaluated. The results were compared with those obtained by a microscopic method according to NCCLS H44-P recommendations and with the results from the automated analyzer Sysmex R-1000. Duplicate samples from 330 patients were analyzed. The reference intervals obtained with the three methods were: MAXM 0.37-1.80%, median 0.83%; manual 0.40-2.30%, median 1.00%; R-1000 0.60-1.95%, median 1.06%. The imprecision (CV) at all concentrations is lower than the microscopic method (low 16.1% vs 67%; normal 16.9% vs 28.9%; high 9.5% vs 13.0%). The MAXIM shows a good overall correlation with the microscopic method (intercept 0.01, slope 0.89, r2 = 0.87) despite evidence of a significant overestimation at low concentrations [difference (D) 0.301 and a moderate underestimation at normal (D -0.15) and high (D - 1.04) concentrations; the same behavior is shown in comparison with results from the R-1000, with an overall underestimation by MAXM (D -0.26). When compared with the microscopic method, MAXM shows a modest sensitivity at low reticulocyte counts (54.8%) and satisfactory sensitivity for high counts (87.3%), with an overall agreement of 81.3%.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1930-1937
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Chemistry
Volume42
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Reticulocytes
Technology
Light
Reticulocyte Count

Keywords

  • hematology
  • instrument evaluation
  • reticulocyte count

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Biochemistry

Cite this

Buttarello, M., Bulian, P., De Prà, M., Barbera, P., & Rizzotti, P. (1996). Reticulocyte quantification by Coulter MAXM VCS (volume, conductivity, light scatter) technology. Clinical Chemistry, 42(12), 1930-1937.

Reticulocyte quantification by Coulter MAXM VCS (volume, conductivity, light scatter) technology. / Buttarello, Mauro; Bulian, Pietro; De Prà, Marina; Barbera, Pietro; Rizzotti, Paolo.

In: Clinical Chemistry, Vol. 42, No. 12, 1996, p. 1930-1937.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buttarello, M, Bulian, P, De Prà, M, Barbera, P & Rizzotti, P 1996, 'Reticulocyte quantification by Coulter MAXM VCS (volume, conductivity, light scatter) technology', Clinical Chemistry, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 1930-1937.
Buttarello, Mauro ; Bulian, Pietro ; De Prà, Marina ; Barbera, Pietro ; Rizzotti, Paolo. / Reticulocyte quantification by Coulter MAXM VCS (volume, conductivity, light scatter) technology. In: Clinical Chemistry. 1996 ; Vol. 42, No. 12. pp. 1930-1937.
@article{06a87775dd6540c4a7443437ac2d0fad,
title = "Reticulocyte quantification by Coulter MAXM VCS (volume, conductivity, light scatter) technology",
abstract = "In this study the ability of the Coulter MAXM analyzer to quantify reticulocytes was evaluated. The results were compared with those obtained by a microscopic method according to NCCLS H44-P recommendations and with the results from the automated analyzer Sysmex R-1000. Duplicate samples from 330 patients were analyzed. The reference intervals obtained with the three methods were: MAXM 0.37-1.80{\%}, median 0.83{\%}; manual 0.40-2.30{\%}, median 1.00{\%}; R-1000 0.60-1.95{\%}, median 1.06{\%}. The imprecision (CV) at all concentrations is lower than the microscopic method (low 16.1{\%} vs 67{\%}; normal 16.9{\%} vs 28.9{\%}; high 9.5{\%} vs 13.0{\%}). The MAXIM shows a good overall correlation with the microscopic method (intercept 0.01, slope 0.89, r2 = 0.87) despite evidence of a significant overestimation at low concentrations [difference (D) 0.301 and a moderate underestimation at normal (D -0.15) and high (D - 1.04) concentrations; the same behavior is shown in comparison with results from the R-1000, with an overall underestimation by MAXM (D -0.26). When compared with the microscopic method, MAXM shows a modest sensitivity at low reticulocyte counts (54.8{\%}) and satisfactory sensitivity for high counts (87.3{\%}), with an overall agreement of 81.3{\%}.",
keywords = "hematology, instrument evaluation, reticulocyte count",
author = "Mauro Buttarello and Pietro Bulian and {De Pr{\`a}}, Marina and Pietro Barbera and Paolo Rizzotti",
year = "1996",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1930--1937",
journal = "Clinical Chemistry",
issn = "0009-9147",
publisher = "American Association for Clinical Chemistry Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reticulocyte quantification by Coulter MAXM VCS (volume, conductivity, light scatter) technology

AU - Buttarello, Mauro

AU - Bulian, Pietro

AU - De Prà, Marina

AU - Barbera, Pietro

AU - Rizzotti, Paolo

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - In this study the ability of the Coulter MAXM analyzer to quantify reticulocytes was evaluated. The results were compared with those obtained by a microscopic method according to NCCLS H44-P recommendations and with the results from the automated analyzer Sysmex R-1000. Duplicate samples from 330 patients were analyzed. The reference intervals obtained with the three methods were: MAXM 0.37-1.80%, median 0.83%; manual 0.40-2.30%, median 1.00%; R-1000 0.60-1.95%, median 1.06%. The imprecision (CV) at all concentrations is lower than the microscopic method (low 16.1% vs 67%; normal 16.9% vs 28.9%; high 9.5% vs 13.0%). The MAXIM shows a good overall correlation with the microscopic method (intercept 0.01, slope 0.89, r2 = 0.87) despite evidence of a significant overestimation at low concentrations [difference (D) 0.301 and a moderate underestimation at normal (D -0.15) and high (D - 1.04) concentrations; the same behavior is shown in comparison with results from the R-1000, with an overall underestimation by MAXM (D -0.26). When compared with the microscopic method, MAXM shows a modest sensitivity at low reticulocyte counts (54.8%) and satisfactory sensitivity for high counts (87.3%), with an overall agreement of 81.3%.

AB - In this study the ability of the Coulter MAXM analyzer to quantify reticulocytes was evaluated. The results were compared with those obtained by a microscopic method according to NCCLS H44-P recommendations and with the results from the automated analyzer Sysmex R-1000. Duplicate samples from 330 patients were analyzed. The reference intervals obtained with the three methods were: MAXM 0.37-1.80%, median 0.83%; manual 0.40-2.30%, median 1.00%; R-1000 0.60-1.95%, median 1.06%. The imprecision (CV) at all concentrations is lower than the microscopic method (low 16.1% vs 67%; normal 16.9% vs 28.9%; high 9.5% vs 13.0%). The MAXIM shows a good overall correlation with the microscopic method (intercept 0.01, slope 0.89, r2 = 0.87) despite evidence of a significant overestimation at low concentrations [difference (D) 0.301 and a moderate underestimation at normal (D -0.15) and high (D - 1.04) concentrations; the same behavior is shown in comparison with results from the R-1000, with an overall underestimation by MAXM (D -0.26). When compared with the microscopic method, MAXM shows a modest sensitivity at low reticulocyte counts (54.8%) and satisfactory sensitivity for high counts (87.3%), with an overall agreement of 81.3%.

KW - hematology

KW - instrument evaluation

KW - reticulocyte count

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029828269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029828269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8969628

AN - SCOPUS:0029828269

VL - 42

SP - 1930

EP - 1937

JO - Clinical Chemistry

JF - Clinical Chemistry

SN - 0009-9147

IS - 12

ER -