TY - JOUR
T1 - Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with no adjuvant chemotherapy in clinical stage i nonseminomatous germ cell tumours
T2 - Long-term outcome and analysis of risk factors of recurrence
AU - Nicolai, Nicola
AU - Miceli, Rosalba
AU - Necchi, Andrea
AU - Biasoni, Davide
AU - Catanzaro, Mario
AU - Milani, Angelo
AU - Piva, Luigi
AU - Pizzocaro, Giorgio
AU - Stagni, Silvia
AU - Torelli, Tullio
AU - Salvioni, Roberto
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - Background: The best management for patients with clinical stage I (CS1) nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) is still under debate. Objective: We evaluated the long-term oncologic outcome of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in patients with CS1 NSGCTs and reevaluated the traditional predictors of recurrence in a set of patients not undergoing adjuvant treatment. Design, setting, and participants: Between 1985 and 1995, 322 consecutive CS1 NSGCT patients underwent primary RPLND not followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in a single referral centre. Patients were followed until relapse for a median time of 17 yr. Measurements: We estimated the crude cumulative incidence of any recurrence. Categories pN and pT, vascular invasion (VI), percentage of embryonal carcinoma, and presence of teratoma were evaluated as 2-yr recurrence predictors of event in a binary logistic model. Results and limitations: Fifty patients had a recurrence (46 in ≤2 yr and only 4 [1.2%] in >2 yr). The 10-yr recurrence incidence was 15.2%. Significant predictors of recurrence at multivariable analysis were pN+, pT >1, and the presence of VI. However, the discriminative ability of the model was modest (Harrell C = 0.74); only 9% and 3% of patients had a predicted recurrence probability >30% and >50%, respectively. Conclusions: RPLND alone could prevent recurrence in 85% of patients and minimise late relapses to 1.2%. Most patients could avoid the immediate and late toxicity of chemotherapy. Prognostic parameters combined into the multivariable model appeared of limited use in identifying a subset of patients at high risk of recurrence.
AB - Background: The best management for patients with clinical stage I (CS1) nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) is still under debate. Objective: We evaluated the long-term oncologic outcome of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in patients with CS1 NSGCTs and reevaluated the traditional predictors of recurrence in a set of patients not undergoing adjuvant treatment. Design, setting, and participants: Between 1985 and 1995, 322 consecutive CS1 NSGCT patients underwent primary RPLND not followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in a single referral centre. Patients were followed until relapse for a median time of 17 yr. Measurements: We estimated the crude cumulative incidence of any recurrence. Categories pN and pT, vascular invasion (VI), percentage of embryonal carcinoma, and presence of teratoma were evaluated as 2-yr recurrence predictors of event in a binary logistic model. Results and limitations: Fifty patients had a recurrence (46 in ≤2 yr and only 4 [1.2%] in >2 yr). The 10-yr recurrence incidence was 15.2%. Significant predictors of recurrence at multivariable analysis were pN+, pT >1, and the presence of VI. However, the discriminative ability of the model was modest (Harrell C = 0.74); only 9% and 3% of patients had a predicted recurrence probability >30% and >50%, respectively. Conclusions: RPLND alone could prevent recurrence in 85% of patients and minimise late relapses to 1.2%. Most patients could avoid the immediate and late toxicity of chemotherapy. Prognostic parameters combined into the multivariable model appeared of limited use in identifying a subset of patients at high risk of recurrence.
KW - Clinical stage I
KW - Germ cell and embryonal
KW - Lymph node excision
KW - Neoplasms
KW - Retroperitoneal space
KW - Risk factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049477610&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78049477610&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.032
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.032
M3 - Article
C2 - 20817343
AN - SCOPUS:78049477610
VL - 58
SP - 912
EP - 918
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
SN - 0302-2838
IS - 6
ER -