Retrospective comparison of conservative and radical neck dissection in laryngeal cancer

R. Molinari, G. Cantu, F. Chiesa, C. Grandi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A retrospective comparison of radical and conservative technique for neck dissection in cancer of the larynx was made, starting from analysis of 98 patients operated on with the conservative procedure (128 cervical neck fields at risk of recurrence) at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan. Furthermore, a series of 162 patients was selected from more than 500 radical neck dissections performed in the past to set up a series as comparable as possible as far as several parameters were concerned. No significant difference was found between radical and conservative neck dissection with regard to the incidence of recurrences in the operative field, either considering the whole series (2.5% versus 1.6%), or cases with histologically proven metastases (9.4% versus 4.5%). Conservative neck dissection seems as safe as radical neck dissection, at least within the limits set in the present study for the indication of the former procedure, ie, nonsuspect nodes or metastatic mobile nodes not greater than 2.5 cm.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)578-581
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology
Volume89
Issue number6 I
Publication statusPublished - 1980

Fingerprint

Neck Dissection
Laryngeal Neoplasms
Recurrence
Neck
Neoplasm Metastasis
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Retrospective comparison of conservative and radical neck dissection in laryngeal cancer. / Molinari, R.; Cantu, G.; Chiesa, F.; Grandi, C.

In: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Vol. 89, No. 6 I, 1980, p. 578-581.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Molinari, R. ; Cantu, G. ; Chiesa, F. ; Grandi, C. / Retrospective comparison of conservative and radical neck dissection in laryngeal cancer. In: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology. 1980 ; Vol. 89, No. 6 I. pp. 578-581.
@article{569e177aa8fe4018b49dcc306699acb3,
title = "Retrospective comparison of conservative and radical neck dissection in laryngeal cancer",
abstract = "A retrospective comparison of radical and conservative technique for neck dissection in cancer of the larynx was made, starting from analysis of 98 patients operated on with the conservative procedure (128 cervical neck fields at risk of recurrence) at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan. Furthermore, a series of 162 patients was selected from more than 500 radical neck dissections performed in the past to set up a series as comparable as possible as far as several parameters were concerned. No significant difference was found between radical and conservative neck dissection with regard to the incidence of recurrences in the operative field, either considering the whole series (2.5{\%} versus 1.6{\%}), or cases with histologically proven metastases (9.4{\%} versus 4.5{\%}). Conservative neck dissection seems as safe as radical neck dissection, at least within the limits set in the present study for the indication of the former procedure, ie, nonsuspect nodes or metastatic mobile nodes not greater than 2.5 cm.",
author = "R. Molinari and G. Cantu and F. Chiesa and C. Grandi",
year = "1980",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "578--581",
journal = "Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology",
issn = "0003-4894",
publisher = "Annals Publishing Company",
number = "6 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retrospective comparison of conservative and radical neck dissection in laryngeal cancer

AU - Molinari, R.

AU - Cantu, G.

AU - Chiesa, F.

AU - Grandi, C.

PY - 1980

Y1 - 1980

N2 - A retrospective comparison of radical and conservative technique for neck dissection in cancer of the larynx was made, starting from analysis of 98 patients operated on with the conservative procedure (128 cervical neck fields at risk of recurrence) at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan. Furthermore, a series of 162 patients was selected from more than 500 radical neck dissections performed in the past to set up a series as comparable as possible as far as several parameters were concerned. No significant difference was found between radical and conservative neck dissection with regard to the incidence of recurrences in the operative field, either considering the whole series (2.5% versus 1.6%), or cases with histologically proven metastases (9.4% versus 4.5%). Conservative neck dissection seems as safe as radical neck dissection, at least within the limits set in the present study for the indication of the former procedure, ie, nonsuspect nodes or metastatic mobile nodes not greater than 2.5 cm.

AB - A retrospective comparison of radical and conservative technique for neck dissection in cancer of the larynx was made, starting from analysis of 98 patients operated on with the conservative procedure (128 cervical neck fields at risk of recurrence) at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan. Furthermore, a series of 162 patients was selected from more than 500 radical neck dissections performed in the past to set up a series as comparable as possible as far as several parameters were concerned. No significant difference was found between radical and conservative neck dissection with regard to the incidence of recurrences in the operative field, either considering the whole series (2.5% versus 1.6%), or cases with histologically proven metastases (9.4% versus 4.5%). Conservative neck dissection seems as safe as radical neck dissection, at least within the limits set in the present study for the indication of the former procedure, ie, nonsuspect nodes or metastatic mobile nodes not greater than 2.5 cm.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019205692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019205692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7458153

AN - SCOPUS:0019205692

VL - 89

SP - 578

EP - 581

JO - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

JF - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

SN - 0003-4894

IS - 6 I

ER -