Retrospective comparison of qualitative and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in diagnosing and monitoring the ALL1-AF4 fusion transcript in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

I. Elia, E. Gottardi, G. Floriddia, R. Grillo, F. Ciambelli, M. Luciani, P. Chiusolo, R. Invernizzi, G. Meloni, R. Foà, G. Saglio, G. Cimino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (Q-RT-PCR) to qualitative RT-PCR in determining response to therapy and predicting clinical outcome in 18 retrospectively selected patients with ALL positive for the ALL1-AF4 fusion and with frozen RNA samples collected at diagnosis and during follow-up (96 samples analysed). The ALL1-AF4 junction was detected by qualitative RT-PCR in 18 patients and by Q-RT-PCR in 17 patients (one patient harboured the rare e10-e6 ALL1-AF4 junction, which falls outside of the primer and probe location designed for the Q-RT-PCR). In three of the 12 patients negative to qualitative RT-PCR after induction therapy, a small number of ALL1-AF4 copies was detected by Q-RT-PCR. Thus nine patients were negative and eight positive. Seven of the eight positive patients suffered a relapse, including two of the three patients positive to Q-RT-PCR yet negative to qualitative RT-PCR. Moreover, we found two (5%) discordant results among the 39 follow-up tests of the nine patients who converted to a negative qualitative-quantitative PCR status. The results suggest that qualitative RT-PCR is more appropriate for the routine diagnosis of this genetic alteration. However, Q-RT-PCR is more accurate in assessing the molecular response after induction treatment and could be more useful in clinical decision-making in ALL1-AF4-positive ALL patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1824-1830
Number of pages7
JournalLeukemia
Volume18
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2004

Fingerprint

Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Therapeutics
RNA
Recurrence

Keywords

  • Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
  • Monitoring of ALL1/AF4 transcript
  • Q-RT-PCR
  • Qualitative RT-PCR

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Retrospective comparison of qualitative and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in diagnosing and monitoring the ALL1-AF4 fusion transcript in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. / Elia, I.; Gottardi, E.; Floriddia, G.; Grillo, R.; Ciambelli, F.; Luciani, M.; Chiusolo, P.; Invernizzi, R.; Meloni, G.; Foà, R.; Saglio, G.; Cimino, G.

In: Leukemia, Vol. 18, No. 11, 11.2004, p. 1824-1830.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Elia, I. ; Gottardi, E. ; Floriddia, G. ; Grillo, R. ; Ciambelli, F. ; Luciani, M. ; Chiusolo, P. ; Invernizzi, R. ; Meloni, G. ; Foà, R. ; Saglio, G. ; Cimino, G. / Retrospective comparison of qualitative and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in diagnosing and monitoring the ALL1-AF4 fusion transcript in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. In: Leukemia. 2004 ; Vol. 18, No. 11. pp. 1824-1830.
@article{19e22ed787d847e885ef9e71fc449cde,
title = "Retrospective comparison of qualitative and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in diagnosing and monitoring the ALL1-AF4 fusion transcript in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia",
abstract = "We compared quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (Q-RT-PCR) to qualitative RT-PCR in determining response to therapy and predicting clinical outcome in 18 retrospectively selected patients with ALL positive for the ALL1-AF4 fusion and with frozen RNA samples collected at diagnosis and during follow-up (96 samples analysed). The ALL1-AF4 junction was detected by qualitative RT-PCR in 18 patients and by Q-RT-PCR in 17 patients (one patient harboured the rare e10-e6 ALL1-AF4 junction, which falls outside of the primer and probe location designed for the Q-RT-PCR). In three of the 12 patients negative to qualitative RT-PCR after induction therapy, a small number of ALL1-AF4 copies was detected by Q-RT-PCR. Thus nine patients were negative and eight positive. Seven of the eight positive patients suffered a relapse, including two of the three patients positive to Q-RT-PCR yet negative to qualitative RT-PCR. Moreover, we found two (5{\%}) discordant results among the 39 follow-up tests of the nine patients who converted to a negative qualitative-quantitative PCR status. The results suggest that qualitative RT-PCR is more appropriate for the routine diagnosis of this genetic alteration. However, Q-RT-PCR is more accurate in assessing the molecular response after induction treatment and could be more useful in clinical decision-making in ALL1-AF4-positive ALL patients.",
keywords = "Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, Monitoring of ALL1/AF4 transcript, Q-RT-PCR, Qualitative RT-PCR",
author = "I. Elia and E. Gottardi and G. Floriddia and R. Grillo and F. Ciambelli and M. Luciani and P. Chiusolo and R. Invernizzi and G. Meloni and R. Fo{\`a} and G. Saglio and G. Cimino",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1038/sj.leu.2403448",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1824--1830",
journal = "Leukemia",
issn = "0887-6924",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retrospective comparison of qualitative and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in diagnosing and monitoring the ALL1-AF4 fusion transcript in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

AU - Elia, I.

AU - Gottardi, E.

AU - Floriddia, G.

AU - Grillo, R.

AU - Ciambelli, F.

AU - Luciani, M.

AU - Chiusolo, P.

AU - Invernizzi, R.

AU - Meloni, G.

AU - Foà, R.

AU - Saglio, G.

AU - Cimino, G.

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - We compared quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (Q-RT-PCR) to qualitative RT-PCR in determining response to therapy and predicting clinical outcome in 18 retrospectively selected patients with ALL positive for the ALL1-AF4 fusion and with frozen RNA samples collected at diagnosis and during follow-up (96 samples analysed). The ALL1-AF4 junction was detected by qualitative RT-PCR in 18 patients and by Q-RT-PCR in 17 patients (one patient harboured the rare e10-e6 ALL1-AF4 junction, which falls outside of the primer and probe location designed for the Q-RT-PCR). In three of the 12 patients negative to qualitative RT-PCR after induction therapy, a small number of ALL1-AF4 copies was detected by Q-RT-PCR. Thus nine patients were negative and eight positive. Seven of the eight positive patients suffered a relapse, including two of the three patients positive to Q-RT-PCR yet negative to qualitative RT-PCR. Moreover, we found two (5%) discordant results among the 39 follow-up tests of the nine patients who converted to a negative qualitative-quantitative PCR status. The results suggest that qualitative RT-PCR is more appropriate for the routine diagnosis of this genetic alteration. However, Q-RT-PCR is more accurate in assessing the molecular response after induction treatment and could be more useful in clinical decision-making in ALL1-AF4-positive ALL patients.

AB - We compared quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (Q-RT-PCR) to qualitative RT-PCR in determining response to therapy and predicting clinical outcome in 18 retrospectively selected patients with ALL positive for the ALL1-AF4 fusion and with frozen RNA samples collected at diagnosis and during follow-up (96 samples analysed). The ALL1-AF4 junction was detected by qualitative RT-PCR in 18 patients and by Q-RT-PCR in 17 patients (one patient harboured the rare e10-e6 ALL1-AF4 junction, which falls outside of the primer and probe location designed for the Q-RT-PCR). In three of the 12 patients negative to qualitative RT-PCR after induction therapy, a small number of ALL1-AF4 copies was detected by Q-RT-PCR. Thus nine patients were negative and eight positive. Seven of the eight positive patients suffered a relapse, including two of the three patients positive to Q-RT-PCR yet negative to qualitative RT-PCR. Moreover, we found two (5%) discordant results among the 39 follow-up tests of the nine patients who converted to a negative qualitative-quantitative PCR status. The results suggest that qualitative RT-PCR is more appropriate for the routine diagnosis of this genetic alteration. However, Q-RT-PCR is more accurate in assessing the molecular response after induction treatment and could be more useful in clinical decision-making in ALL1-AF4-positive ALL patients.

KW - Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

KW - Monitoring of ALL1/AF4 transcript

KW - Q-RT-PCR

KW - Qualitative RT-PCR

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8844275982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8844275982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/sj.leu.2403448

DO - 10.1038/sj.leu.2403448

M3 - Article

C2 - 15318246

AN - SCOPUS:8844275982

VL - 18

SP - 1824

EP - 1830

JO - Leukemia

JF - Leukemia

SN - 0887-6924

IS - 11

ER -