Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in older patients: is it worth it? A subjective functional outcome and quality of life survey

T. Mangano, P. Cerruti, I. Repetto, L. Felli, N. Ivaldo, M. Giovale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) use has largely spread in the last decade. Doubts still exist, however, about its use in the elder population, because of high risk of complications and possibly limited cost-efficiency of the procedure. Aims: Our work was aimed at defining the subjective outcome, complication and satisfaction rate, and perceived recovery of individual autonomy and quality of life after RSA, in a cohort of patients 79 or more years old at the time of surgery. Methods: Between 2007 and 2012, 52 patients 79 years old or older received a RSA. In the setting of this study, 27 patients (31 shoulders) were available for clinical evaluation. The ASES score was used for subjective outcome evaluation, while the health-related quality of life was studied with the SF-12 form. An ad hoc questionnaire was used in order to evaluate the satisfaction rate and the recovery in individual autonomy. Results: At 59,3 months mean follow-up, only one patient required revision due to periprosthetic fracture. ASES score attested at 78.2, and SF-12 scores showed values similar to the general age-matched population. Sensible improvement in perceived quality of life was described by 24 patients. When present, comorbidities were associated with lower results. Discussion: RSA outcomes in the elderly are good in terms of function, satisfaction and quality of life recovery. Complications appear primarily linked to age-related conditions and comorbidities show critical association with lower results. Conclusions: Our study confirms that RSA represents a useful solution for end-stage shoulder disease also in the advanced age population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalAging clinical and experimental research
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Nov 21 2015

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Quality of Life
Comorbidity
Periprosthetic Fractures
Population
Surveys and Questionnaires
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Gleno-humeral osteoarthritis
  • Octogenarian
  • Older patients
  • Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  • Shoulder disease

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ageing
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in older patients : is it worth it? A subjective functional outcome and quality of life survey. / Mangano, T.; Cerruti, P.; Repetto, I.; Felli, L.; Ivaldo, N.; Giovale, M.

In: Aging clinical and experimental research, 21.11.2015, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{22f6fe3724844838b0ca555387135617,
title = "Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in older patients: is it worth it? A subjective functional outcome and quality of life survey",
abstract = "Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) use has largely spread in the last decade. Doubts still exist, however, about its use in the elder population, because of high risk of complications and possibly limited cost-efficiency of the procedure. Aims: Our work was aimed at defining the subjective outcome, complication and satisfaction rate, and perceived recovery of individual autonomy and quality of life after RSA, in a cohort of patients 79 or more years old at the time of surgery. Methods: Between 2007 and 2012, 52 patients 79 years old or older received a RSA. In the setting of this study, 27 patients (31 shoulders) were available for clinical evaluation. The ASES score was used for subjective outcome evaluation, while the health-related quality of life was studied with the SF-12 form. An ad hoc questionnaire was used in order to evaluate the satisfaction rate and the recovery in individual autonomy. Results: At 59,3 months mean follow-up, only one patient required revision due to periprosthetic fracture. ASES score attested at 78.2, and SF-12 scores showed values similar to the general age-matched population. Sensible improvement in perceived quality of life was described by 24 patients. When present, comorbidities were associated with lower results. Discussion: RSA outcomes in the elderly are good in terms of function, satisfaction and quality of life recovery. Complications appear primarily linked to age-related conditions and comorbidities show critical association with lower results. Conclusions: Our study confirms that RSA represents a useful solution for end-stage shoulder disease also in the advanced age population.",
keywords = "Gleno-humeral osteoarthritis, Octogenarian, Older patients, Reverse shoulder arthroplasty, Shoulder disease",
author = "T. Mangano and P. Cerruti and I. Repetto and L. Felli and N. Ivaldo and M. Giovale",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1007/s40520-015-0493-2",
language = "English",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Aging clinical and experimental research",
issn = "1594-0667",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in older patients

T2 - is it worth it? A subjective functional outcome and quality of life survey

AU - Mangano, T.

AU - Cerruti, P.

AU - Repetto, I.

AU - Felli, L.

AU - Ivaldo, N.

AU - Giovale, M.

PY - 2015/11/21

Y1 - 2015/11/21

N2 - Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) use has largely spread in the last decade. Doubts still exist, however, about its use in the elder population, because of high risk of complications and possibly limited cost-efficiency of the procedure. Aims: Our work was aimed at defining the subjective outcome, complication and satisfaction rate, and perceived recovery of individual autonomy and quality of life after RSA, in a cohort of patients 79 or more years old at the time of surgery. Methods: Between 2007 and 2012, 52 patients 79 years old or older received a RSA. In the setting of this study, 27 patients (31 shoulders) were available for clinical evaluation. The ASES score was used for subjective outcome evaluation, while the health-related quality of life was studied with the SF-12 form. An ad hoc questionnaire was used in order to evaluate the satisfaction rate and the recovery in individual autonomy. Results: At 59,3 months mean follow-up, only one patient required revision due to periprosthetic fracture. ASES score attested at 78.2, and SF-12 scores showed values similar to the general age-matched population. Sensible improvement in perceived quality of life was described by 24 patients. When present, comorbidities were associated with lower results. Discussion: RSA outcomes in the elderly are good in terms of function, satisfaction and quality of life recovery. Complications appear primarily linked to age-related conditions and comorbidities show critical association with lower results. Conclusions: Our study confirms that RSA represents a useful solution for end-stage shoulder disease also in the advanced age population.

AB - Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) use has largely spread in the last decade. Doubts still exist, however, about its use in the elder population, because of high risk of complications and possibly limited cost-efficiency of the procedure. Aims: Our work was aimed at defining the subjective outcome, complication and satisfaction rate, and perceived recovery of individual autonomy and quality of life after RSA, in a cohort of patients 79 or more years old at the time of surgery. Methods: Between 2007 and 2012, 52 patients 79 years old or older received a RSA. In the setting of this study, 27 patients (31 shoulders) were available for clinical evaluation. The ASES score was used for subjective outcome evaluation, while the health-related quality of life was studied with the SF-12 form. An ad hoc questionnaire was used in order to evaluate the satisfaction rate and the recovery in individual autonomy. Results: At 59,3 months mean follow-up, only one patient required revision due to periprosthetic fracture. ASES score attested at 78.2, and SF-12 scores showed values similar to the general age-matched population. Sensible improvement in perceived quality of life was described by 24 patients. When present, comorbidities were associated with lower results. Discussion: RSA outcomes in the elderly are good in terms of function, satisfaction and quality of life recovery. Complications appear primarily linked to age-related conditions and comorbidities show critical association with lower results. Conclusions: Our study confirms that RSA represents a useful solution for end-stage shoulder disease also in the advanced age population.

KW - Gleno-humeral osteoarthritis

KW - Octogenarian

KW - Older patients

KW - Reverse shoulder arthroplasty

KW - Shoulder disease

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947810793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947810793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40520-015-0493-2

DO - 10.1007/s40520-015-0493-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84947810793

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Aging clinical and experimental research

JF - Aging clinical and experimental research

SN - 1594-0667

ER -