Revision of knee prostheses with components malrotation: Treatment algorithm using a computed tomographic analysis

Matteo Fosco, Eugenio Rimondi, Luca Amendola, Giuseppe Rossi, Domenico Tigani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Malrotation of prosthetic components have been widely recognised as a cause of knee prostheses failure. In the present study, we hypothesised that an algorithm including clinical and radiographic evaluation, as well as a computed tomography analysis with defined values, could be reliable for the preoperative diagnosis of knee prosthesis malrotation in order to advise our treatment. Materials and methods: For this purpose, current parameters and related literature were taken into account. We analysed 44 patients with anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Among them, 24 patients (17 females and seven males), aged 43 to 78 years (mean 67 years) were evaluated with computed helicoidal tomography, and subsequently treated in a different way according to severity of their problem. Eight patients with components rotation in the normal range and patients with mild combined external rotation of the prosthesis underwent patella arthroplasty; other 16 patients with malposition in internal rotation or more severe external rotation, underwent complete prosthetic revision. Discussion: After an average follow-up of 32 months (range 12 to 120 months) results assessed according to the Knee Society rating system showed excellent or good clinical outcome in 87% (21 out of 24 patients) and functionally in 75% (18 out of 24 patients) of cases surgically treated. The malposition of knee prosthetic components on the axial plane is an emerging problem, difficult to interpret, which provides various surgical options such as resurfacing of the patella in mild cases until the complete revision of the implant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-68
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Knee Prosthesis
Patella
Therapeutics
Knee
Tomography
Prosthesis Failure
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Arthroplasty
Prostheses and Implants
Reference Values
Pain

Keywords

  • Anterior knee pain
  • Computed tomography
  • Knee prosthesis revision
  • Rotational malalignment
  • Secondary patella resurfacing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Revision of knee prostheses with components malrotation : Treatment algorithm using a computed tomographic analysis. / Fosco, Matteo; Rimondi, Eugenio; Amendola, Luca; Rossi, Giuseppe; Tigani, Domenico.

In: European Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2010, p. 61-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d53b41ed8dbd4e6fa1ac49c60435dbf2,
title = "Revision of knee prostheses with components malrotation: Treatment algorithm using a computed tomographic analysis",
abstract = "Introduction: Malrotation of prosthetic components have been widely recognised as a cause of knee prostheses failure. In the present study, we hypothesised that an algorithm including clinical and radiographic evaluation, as well as a computed tomography analysis with defined values, could be reliable for the preoperative diagnosis of knee prosthesis malrotation in order to advise our treatment. Materials and methods: For this purpose, current parameters and related literature were taken into account. We analysed 44 patients with anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Among them, 24 patients (17 females and seven males), aged 43 to 78 years (mean 67 years) were evaluated with computed helicoidal tomography, and subsequently treated in a different way according to severity of their problem. Eight patients with components rotation in the normal range and patients with mild combined external rotation of the prosthesis underwent patella arthroplasty; other 16 patients with malposition in internal rotation or more severe external rotation, underwent complete prosthetic revision. Discussion: After an average follow-up of 32 months (range 12 to 120 months) results assessed according to the Knee Society rating system showed excellent or good clinical outcome in 87{\%} (21 out of 24 patients) and functionally in 75{\%} (18 out of 24 patients) of cases surgically treated. The malposition of knee prosthetic components on the axial plane is an emerging problem, difficult to interpret, which provides various surgical options such as resurfacing of the patella in mild cases until the complete revision of the implant.",
keywords = "Anterior knee pain, Computed tomography, Knee prosthesis revision, Rotational malalignment, Secondary patella resurfacing",
author = "Matteo Fosco and Eugenio Rimondi and Luca Amendola and Giuseppe Rossi and Domenico Tigani",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/s12570-010-0014-x",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "61--68",
journal = "European Orthopaedics and Traumatology",
issn = "1867-4569",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revision of knee prostheses with components malrotation

T2 - Treatment algorithm using a computed tomographic analysis

AU - Fosco, Matteo

AU - Rimondi, Eugenio

AU - Amendola, Luca

AU - Rossi, Giuseppe

AU - Tigani, Domenico

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Introduction: Malrotation of prosthetic components have been widely recognised as a cause of knee prostheses failure. In the present study, we hypothesised that an algorithm including clinical and radiographic evaluation, as well as a computed tomography analysis with defined values, could be reliable for the preoperative diagnosis of knee prosthesis malrotation in order to advise our treatment. Materials and methods: For this purpose, current parameters and related literature were taken into account. We analysed 44 patients with anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Among them, 24 patients (17 females and seven males), aged 43 to 78 years (mean 67 years) were evaluated with computed helicoidal tomography, and subsequently treated in a different way according to severity of their problem. Eight patients with components rotation in the normal range and patients with mild combined external rotation of the prosthesis underwent patella arthroplasty; other 16 patients with malposition in internal rotation or more severe external rotation, underwent complete prosthetic revision. Discussion: After an average follow-up of 32 months (range 12 to 120 months) results assessed according to the Knee Society rating system showed excellent or good clinical outcome in 87% (21 out of 24 patients) and functionally in 75% (18 out of 24 patients) of cases surgically treated. The malposition of knee prosthetic components on the axial plane is an emerging problem, difficult to interpret, which provides various surgical options such as resurfacing of the patella in mild cases until the complete revision of the implant.

AB - Introduction: Malrotation of prosthetic components have been widely recognised as a cause of knee prostheses failure. In the present study, we hypothesised that an algorithm including clinical and radiographic evaluation, as well as a computed tomography analysis with defined values, could be reliable for the preoperative diagnosis of knee prosthesis malrotation in order to advise our treatment. Materials and methods: For this purpose, current parameters and related literature were taken into account. We analysed 44 patients with anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Among them, 24 patients (17 females and seven males), aged 43 to 78 years (mean 67 years) were evaluated with computed helicoidal tomography, and subsequently treated in a different way according to severity of their problem. Eight patients with components rotation in the normal range and patients with mild combined external rotation of the prosthesis underwent patella arthroplasty; other 16 patients with malposition in internal rotation or more severe external rotation, underwent complete prosthetic revision. Discussion: After an average follow-up of 32 months (range 12 to 120 months) results assessed according to the Knee Society rating system showed excellent or good clinical outcome in 87% (21 out of 24 patients) and functionally in 75% (18 out of 24 patients) of cases surgically treated. The malposition of knee prosthetic components on the axial plane is an emerging problem, difficult to interpret, which provides various surgical options such as resurfacing of the patella in mild cases until the complete revision of the implant.

KW - Anterior knee pain

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Knee prosthesis revision

KW - Rotational malalignment

KW - Secondary patella resurfacing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873248125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873248125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12570-010-0014-x

DO - 10.1007/s12570-010-0014-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84873248125

VL - 1

SP - 61

EP - 68

JO - European Orthopaedics and Traumatology

JF - European Orthopaedics and Traumatology

SN - 1867-4569

IS - 2

ER -