Risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after high technology infertility treatment: A comprehensive systematic review

Stefano Palomba, Roy Homburg, Susanna Santagni, Giovanni Battista La Sala, Raoul Orvieto

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

In the literature, there is growing evidence that subfertile patients who conceived after infertility treatments have an increased risk of pregnancy and perinatal complications and this is particularly true for patients who conceived through use of high technology infertility treatments. Moreover, high technology infertility treatments include many concomitant clinical and biological risk factors. This review aims to summarize in a systematic fashion the current evidence regarding the relative effect of the different procedures for high technology infertility treatments on the risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcome. A literature search up to August 2016 was performed in IBSS, SocINDEX, Institute for Scientific Information, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar and an evidence-based hierarchy was used to determine which articles to include and analyze. Data on prepregnancy maternal factors, low technology interventions, specific procedures for male factor, ovarian tissue/ovary and uterus transplantation, and chromosomal abnormalities and malformations of the offspring were excluded. The available evidences were analyzed assessing the level and the quality of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system, respectively. Current review highlights that every single procedure of high technology infertility treatments can play a crucial role in increasing the risk of pregnancy and perinatal complications. Due to the suboptimal level and quality of the current evidence, further well-designed studies are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number76
JournalReproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 4 2016

Fingerprint

Pregnancy Outcome
Infertility
Technology
Pregnancy Complications
Therapeutics
Evidence-Based Medicine
Biological Factors
Thromboplastin
PubMed
Chromosome Aberrations
Uterus
Ovary
Transplantation
Mothers
Guidelines

Keywords

  • ART
  • Complications
  • Infertility
  • Obstetric
  • Pregnancy
  • Subfertility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Endocrinology
  • Developmental Biology

Cite this

Risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after high technology infertility treatment : A comprehensive systematic review. / Palomba, Stefano; Homburg, Roy; Santagni, Susanna; La Sala, Giovanni Battista; Orvieto, Raoul.

In: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, Vol. 14, No. 1, 76, 04.11.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{a2db1435368643208be937a7163cd1f5,
title = "Risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after high technology infertility treatment: A comprehensive systematic review",
abstract = "In the literature, there is growing evidence that subfertile patients who conceived after infertility treatments have an increased risk of pregnancy and perinatal complications and this is particularly true for patients who conceived through use of high technology infertility treatments. Moreover, high technology infertility treatments include many concomitant clinical and biological risk factors. This review aims to summarize in a systematic fashion the current evidence regarding the relative effect of the different procedures for high technology infertility treatments on the risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcome. A literature search up to August 2016 was performed in IBSS, SocINDEX, Institute for Scientific Information, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar and an evidence-based hierarchy was used to determine which articles to include and analyze. Data on prepregnancy maternal factors, low technology interventions, specific procedures for male factor, ovarian tissue/ovary and uterus transplantation, and chromosomal abnormalities and malformations of the offspring were excluded. The available evidences were analyzed assessing the level and the quality of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system, respectively. Current review highlights that every single procedure of high technology infertility treatments can play a crucial role in increasing the risk of pregnancy and perinatal complications. Due to the suboptimal level and quality of the current evidence, further well-designed studies are needed.",
keywords = "ART, Complications, Infertility, Obstetric, Pregnancy, Subfertility",
author = "Stefano Palomba and Roy Homburg and Susanna Santagni and {La Sala}, {Giovanni Battista} and Raoul Orvieto",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1186/s12958-016-0211-8",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology",
issn = "1477-7827",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after high technology infertility treatment

T2 - A comprehensive systematic review

AU - Palomba, Stefano

AU - Homburg, Roy

AU - Santagni, Susanna

AU - La Sala, Giovanni Battista

AU - Orvieto, Raoul

PY - 2016/11/4

Y1 - 2016/11/4

N2 - In the literature, there is growing evidence that subfertile patients who conceived after infertility treatments have an increased risk of pregnancy and perinatal complications and this is particularly true for patients who conceived through use of high technology infertility treatments. Moreover, high technology infertility treatments include many concomitant clinical and biological risk factors. This review aims to summarize in a systematic fashion the current evidence regarding the relative effect of the different procedures for high technology infertility treatments on the risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcome. A literature search up to August 2016 was performed in IBSS, SocINDEX, Institute for Scientific Information, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar and an evidence-based hierarchy was used to determine which articles to include and analyze. Data on prepregnancy maternal factors, low technology interventions, specific procedures for male factor, ovarian tissue/ovary and uterus transplantation, and chromosomal abnormalities and malformations of the offspring were excluded. The available evidences were analyzed assessing the level and the quality of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system, respectively. Current review highlights that every single procedure of high technology infertility treatments can play a crucial role in increasing the risk of pregnancy and perinatal complications. Due to the suboptimal level and quality of the current evidence, further well-designed studies are needed.

AB - In the literature, there is growing evidence that subfertile patients who conceived after infertility treatments have an increased risk of pregnancy and perinatal complications and this is particularly true for patients who conceived through use of high technology infertility treatments. Moreover, high technology infertility treatments include many concomitant clinical and biological risk factors. This review aims to summarize in a systematic fashion the current evidence regarding the relative effect of the different procedures for high technology infertility treatments on the risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcome. A literature search up to August 2016 was performed in IBSS, SocINDEX, Institute for Scientific Information, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar and an evidence-based hierarchy was used to determine which articles to include and analyze. Data on prepregnancy maternal factors, low technology interventions, specific procedures for male factor, ovarian tissue/ovary and uterus transplantation, and chromosomal abnormalities and malformations of the offspring were excluded. The available evidences were analyzed assessing the level and the quality of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system, respectively. Current review highlights that every single procedure of high technology infertility treatments can play a crucial role in increasing the risk of pregnancy and perinatal complications. Due to the suboptimal level and quality of the current evidence, further well-designed studies are needed.

KW - ART

KW - Complications

KW - Infertility

KW - Obstetric

KW - Pregnancy

KW - Subfertility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994386074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994386074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12958-016-0211-8

DO - 10.1186/s12958-016-0211-8

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84994386074

VL - 14

JO - Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

JF - Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

SN - 1477-7827

IS - 1

M1 - 76

ER -