Robotic Assisted Surgery in Pediatric Gynecology: Promising Innovation in Mini Invasive Surgical Procedures

Ghassan Nakib, Valeria Calcaterra, Federico Scorletti, Piero Romano, Ilaria Goruppi, Simonetta Mencherini, Luigi Avolio, Gloria Pelizzo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objective: Robotic assisted surgery is not yet widely applied in the pediatric field. We report our initial experience regarding the feasibility, safety, benefits, and limitations of robot-assisted surgery in pediatric gynecological patients. Design: Descriptive, retrospective report of experience with pediatric gynecological patients over a period of 12 months. Setting: Department of Pediatric Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation. Participants: Children and adolescents, with a surgical diagnosis of ovarian and/or tubal lesions. Main Outcome Measures: Robot assembly time and operative time, days of hospitalization, time to cessation of pain medication, complication rate, conversion rate to laparoscopic procedure and trocar insertion strategy. Results: Six children and adolescents (2.4-15 yrs), weighing 12-55 kg, underwent robotic assisted surgery for adnexal pathologies: 2 for ovarian cystectomy, 2 for oophorectomy, 1 for right oophorectomy and left salpingo-oophorectomy for gonadal disgenesis, 1 for exploration for suspected pelvic malformation. Mean operative time was 117.5 ± 34.9 minutes. Conversion to laparatomy was not necessary in any of the cases. No intra- or postoperative complications occurred. Conclusion: Initial results indicate that robotic assisted surgery is safely applicable in the pediatric gynecological population, although it is still premature to conclude that it provides better clinical outcomes than traditional laparoscopic surgery. Randomized, prospective, comparative studies will help characterize the advantages and disadvantages of this new technology in pediatric patients.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Robotics
Gynecology
Pediatrics
Ovariectomy
Operative Time
Cystectomy
Intraoperative Complications
Surgical Instruments
Laparoscopy
Hospitalization
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies
Pathology
Technology
Safety
Pain
Population

Keywords

  • Children
  • Gynecology
  • Robotic
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Robotic Assisted Surgery in Pediatric Gynecology : Promising Innovation in Mini Invasive Surgical Procedures. / Nakib, Ghassan; Calcaterra, Valeria; Scorletti, Federico; Romano, Piero; Goruppi, Ilaria; Mencherini, Simonetta; Avolio, Luigi; Pelizzo, Gloria.

In: Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, Vol. 26, No. 1, 02.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bcf4a449f46f4fd18709a716e42b65a6,
title = "Robotic Assisted Surgery in Pediatric Gynecology: Promising Innovation in Mini Invasive Surgical Procedures",
abstract = "Study Objective: Robotic assisted surgery is not yet widely applied in the pediatric field. We report our initial experience regarding the feasibility, safety, benefits, and limitations of robot-assisted surgery in pediatric gynecological patients. Design: Descriptive, retrospective report of experience with pediatric gynecological patients over a period of 12 months. Setting: Department of Pediatric Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation. Participants: Children and adolescents, with a surgical diagnosis of ovarian and/or tubal lesions. Main Outcome Measures: Robot assembly time and operative time, days of hospitalization, time to cessation of pain medication, complication rate, conversion rate to laparoscopic procedure and trocar insertion strategy. Results: Six children and adolescents (2.4-15 yrs), weighing 12-55 kg, underwent robotic assisted surgery for adnexal pathologies: 2 for ovarian cystectomy, 2 for oophorectomy, 1 for right oophorectomy and left salpingo-oophorectomy for gonadal disgenesis, 1 for exploration for suspected pelvic malformation. Mean operative time was 117.5 ± 34.9 minutes. Conversion to laparatomy was not necessary in any of the cases. No intra- or postoperative complications occurred. Conclusion: Initial results indicate that robotic assisted surgery is safely applicable in the pediatric gynecological population, although it is still premature to conclude that it provides better clinical outcomes than traditional laparoscopic surgery. Randomized, prospective, comparative studies will help characterize the advantages and disadvantages of this new technology in pediatric patients.",
keywords = "Children, Gynecology, Robotic, Surgery",
author = "Ghassan Nakib and Valeria Calcaterra and Federico Scorletti and Piero Romano and Ilaria Goruppi and Simonetta Mencherini and Luigi Avolio and Gloria Pelizzo",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpag.2012.09.009",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology",
issn = "1083-3188",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic Assisted Surgery in Pediatric Gynecology

T2 - Promising Innovation in Mini Invasive Surgical Procedures

AU - Nakib, Ghassan

AU - Calcaterra, Valeria

AU - Scorletti, Federico

AU - Romano, Piero

AU - Goruppi, Ilaria

AU - Mencherini, Simonetta

AU - Avolio, Luigi

AU - Pelizzo, Gloria

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Study Objective: Robotic assisted surgery is not yet widely applied in the pediatric field. We report our initial experience regarding the feasibility, safety, benefits, and limitations of robot-assisted surgery in pediatric gynecological patients. Design: Descriptive, retrospective report of experience with pediatric gynecological patients over a period of 12 months. Setting: Department of Pediatric Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation. Participants: Children and adolescents, with a surgical diagnosis of ovarian and/or tubal lesions. Main Outcome Measures: Robot assembly time and operative time, days of hospitalization, time to cessation of pain medication, complication rate, conversion rate to laparoscopic procedure and trocar insertion strategy. Results: Six children and adolescents (2.4-15 yrs), weighing 12-55 kg, underwent robotic assisted surgery for adnexal pathologies: 2 for ovarian cystectomy, 2 for oophorectomy, 1 for right oophorectomy and left salpingo-oophorectomy for gonadal disgenesis, 1 for exploration for suspected pelvic malformation. Mean operative time was 117.5 ± 34.9 minutes. Conversion to laparatomy was not necessary in any of the cases. No intra- or postoperative complications occurred. Conclusion: Initial results indicate that robotic assisted surgery is safely applicable in the pediatric gynecological population, although it is still premature to conclude that it provides better clinical outcomes than traditional laparoscopic surgery. Randomized, prospective, comparative studies will help characterize the advantages and disadvantages of this new technology in pediatric patients.

AB - Study Objective: Robotic assisted surgery is not yet widely applied in the pediatric field. We report our initial experience regarding the feasibility, safety, benefits, and limitations of robot-assisted surgery in pediatric gynecological patients. Design: Descriptive, retrospective report of experience with pediatric gynecological patients over a period of 12 months. Setting: Department of Pediatric Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation. Participants: Children and adolescents, with a surgical diagnosis of ovarian and/or tubal lesions. Main Outcome Measures: Robot assembly time and operative time, days of hospitalization, time to cessation of pain medication, complication rate, conversion rate to laparoscopic procedure and trocar insertion strategy. Results: Six children and adolescents (2.4-15 yrs), weighing 12-55 kg, underwent robotic assisted surgery for adnexal pathologies: 2 for ovarian cystectomy, 2 for oophorectomy, 1 for right oophorectomy and left salpingo-oophorectomy for gonadal disgenesis, 1 for exploration for suspected pelvic malformation. Mean operative time was 117.5 ± 34.9 minutes. Conversion to laparatomy was not necessary in any of the cases. No intra- or postoperative complications occurred. Conclusion: Initial results indicate that robotic assisted surgery is safely applicable in the pediatric gynecological population, although it is still premature to conclude that it provides better clinical outcomes than traditional laparoscopic surgery. Randomized, prospective, comparative studies will help characterize the advantages and disadvantages of this new technology in pediatric patients.

KW - Children

KW - Gynecology

KW - Robotic

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872494763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872494763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpag.2012.09.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jpag.2012.09.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 23158752

AN - SCOPUS:84872494763

VL - 26

JO - Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

JF - Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

SN - 1083-3188

IS - 1

ER -