Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation

Carlo Pappone, Gabriele Vicedomini, Francesco Manguso, Filippo Gugliotta, Patrizio Mazzone, Simone Gulletta, Nicoleta Sora, Simone Sala, Alessandra Marzi, Giuseppe Augello, Laura Livolsi, Andreina Santagostino, Vincenzo Santinelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We assessed feasibility of magnetic catheter guidance in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA). BACKGROUND: No data are available on feasibility of remote navigation for AF ablation. METHODS: Forty patients underwent CPVA for symptomatic AF using the NIOBE II remote magnetic system (Stereotaxis Inc., St. Louis, Missouri). Ablation was performed with a 4-mm tip, magnetic catheter (65°C, maximum 50 W, 15 s). The catheter tip was guided by a uniform magnetic field (0.08-T), and a motor drive (Cardiodrive unit, Stereotaxis Inc.). Left atrium maps were created using an integrated CARTO RMT system (Stereotaxis Inc.). End point of ablation was voltage abatement >90% of bipolar electrogram amplitude. RESULTS: Remote ablation was successful in 38 of 40 patients without complications. The median mapping and ablation time was 152.5 min (range, 90 to 380 min) but was much longer in the first 12 patients (192.5 min vs. 148 min; p = 0.012). Median ablation time was 49.5 min (range, 17 to 154 min), but it was much shorter in the last 28 patients than in the first 12 patients (49 min vs. 70 min; p = 0.021). Patients receiving remote ablation had longer procedure times than control patients (p <0.001) with similar mapping time but shorter ablation time on right-sided pulmonary veins. Many more mapping points regardless of their location were collected remotely (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Remote magnetic navigation for AF ablation is safe and feasible with a short learning curve. Although all procedures were performed by a highly experienced operator, remote AF ablation can be performed even by less experienced operators.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1390-1400
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume47
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 7 2006

Fingerprint

Robotics
Atrial Fibrillation
Pulmonary Veins
Catheters
Learning Curve
Magnetic Fields
Heart Atria

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. / Pappone, Carlo; Vicedomini, Gabriele; Manguso, Francesco; Gugliotta, Filippo; Mazzone, Patrizio; Gulletta, Simone; Sora, Nicoleta; Sala, Simone; Marzi, Alessandra; Augello, Giuseppe; Livolsi, Laura; Santagostino, Andreina; Santinelli, Vincenzo.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 47, No. 7, 07.04.2006, p. 1390-1400.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pappone, C, Vicedomini, G, Manguso, F, Gugliotta, F, Mazzone, P, Gulletta, S, Sora, N, Sala, S, Marzi, A, Augello, G, Livolsi, L, Santagostino, A & Santinelli, V 2006, 'Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation', Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1390-1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.058
Pappone, Carlo ; Vicedomini, Gabriele ; Manguso, Francesco ; Gugliotta, Filippo ; Mazzone, Patrizio ; Gulletta, Simone ; Sora, Nicoleta ; Sala, Simone ; Marzi, Alessandra ; Augello, Giuseppe ; Livolsi, Laura ; Santagostino, Andreina ; Santinelli, Vincenzo. / Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2006 ; Vol. 47, No. 7. pp. 1390-1400.
@article{6bbe6b9ba94e43c58eeccd218299df8c,
title = "Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: We assessed feasibility of magnetic catheter guidance in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA). BACKGROUND: No data are available on feasibility of remote navigation for AF ablation. METHODS: Forty patients underwent CPVA for symptomatic AF using the NIOBE II remote magnetic system (Stereotaxis Inc., St. Louis, Missouri). Ablation was performed with a 4-mm tip, magnetic catheter (65°C, maximum 50 W, 15 s). The catheter tip was guided by a uniform magnetic field (0.08-T), and a motor drive (Cardiodrive unit, Stereotaxis Inc.). Left atrium maps were created using an integrated CARTO RMT system (Stereotaxis Inc.). End point of ablation was voltage abatement >90{\%} of bipolar electrogram amplitude. RESULTS: Remote ablation was successful in 38 of 40 patients without complications. The median mapping and ablation time was 152.5 min (range, 90 to 380 min) but was much longer in the first 12 patients (192.5 min vs. 148 min; p = 0.012). Median ablation time was 49.5 min (range, 17 to 154 min), but it was much shorter in the last 28 patients than in the first 12 patients (49 min vs. 70 min; p = 0.021). Patients receiving remote ablation had longer procedure times than control patients (p <0.001) with similar mapping time but shorter ablation time on right-sided pulmonary veins. Many more mapping points regardless of their location were collected remotely (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Remote magnetic navigation for AF ablation is safe and feasible with a short learning curve. Although all procedures were performed by a highly experienced operator, remote AF ablation can be performed even by less experienced operators.",
author = "Carlo Pappone and Gabriele Vicedomini and Francesco Manguso and Filippo Gugliotta and Patrizio Mazzone and Simone Gulletta and Nicoleta Sora and Simone Sala and Alessandra Marzi and Giuseppe Augello and Laura Livolsi and Andreina Santagostino and Vincenzo Santinelli",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.058",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "1390--1400",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation

AU - Pappone, Carlo

AU - Vicedomini, Gabriele

AU - Manguso, Francesco

AU - Gugliotta, Filippo

AU - Mazzone, Patrizio

AU - Gulletta, Simone

AU - Sora, Nicoleta

AU - Sala, Simone

AU - Marzi, Alessandra

AU - Augello, Giuseppe

AU - Livolsi, Laura

AU - Santagostino, Andreina

AU - Santinelli, Vincenzo

PY - 2006/4/7

Y1 - 2006/4/7

N2 - OBJECTIVES: We assessed feasibility of magnetic catheter guidance in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA). BACKGROUND: No data are available on feasibility of remote navigation for AF ablation. METHODS: Forty patients underwent CPVA for symptomatic AF using the NIOBE II remote magnetic system (Stereotaxis Inc., St. Louis, Missouri). Ablation was performed with a 4-mm tip, magnetic catheter (65°C, maximum 50 W, 15 s). The catheter tip was guided by a uniform magnetic field (0.08-T), and a motor drive (Cardiodrive unit, Stereotaxis Inc.). Left atrium maps were created using an integrated CARTO RMT system (Stereotaxis Inc.). End point of ablation was voltage abatement >90% of bipolar electrogram amplitude. RESULTS: Remote ablation was successful in 38 of 40 patients without complications. The median mapping and ablation time was 152.5 min (range, 90 to 380 min) but was much longer in the first 12 patients (192.5 min vs. 148 min; p = 0.012). Median ablation time was 49.5 min (range, 17 to 154 min), but it was much shorter in the last 28 patients than in the first 12 patients (49 min vs. 70 min; p = 0.021). Patients receiving remote ablation had longer procedure times than control patients (p <0.001) with similar mapping time but shorter ablation time on right-sided pulmonary veins. Many more mapping points regardless of their location were collected remotely (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Remote magnetic navigation for AF ablation is safe and feasible with a short learning curve. Although all procedures were performed by a highly experienced operator, remote AF ablation can be performed even by less experienced operators.

AB - OBJECTIVES: We assessed feasibility of magnetic catheter guidance in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA). BACKGROUND: No data are available on feasibility of remote navigation for AF ablation. METHODS: Forty patients underwent CPVA for symptomatic AF using the NIOBE II remote magnetic system (Stereotaxis Inc., St. Louis, Missouri). Ablation was performed with a 4-mm tip, magnetic catheter (65°C, maximum 50 W, 15 s). The catheter tip was guided by a uniform magnetic field (0.08-T), and a motor drive (Cardiodrive unit, Stereotaxis Inc.). Left atrium maps were created using an integrated CARTO RMT system (Stereotaxis Inc.). End point of ablation was voltage abatement >90% of bipolar electrogram amplitude. RESULTS: Remote ablation was successful in 38 of 40 patients without complications. The median mapping and ablation time was 152.5 min (range, 90 to 380 min) but was much longer in the first 12 patients (192.5 min vs. 148 min; p = 0.012). Median ablation time was 49.5 min (range, 17 to 154 min), but it was much shorter in the last 28 patients than in the first 12 patients (49 min vs. 70 min; p = 0.021). Patients receiving remote ablation had longer procedure times than control patients (p <0.001) with similar mapping time but shorter ablation time on right-sided pulmonary veins. Many more mapping points regardless of their location were collected remotely (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Remote magnetic navigation for AF ablation is safe and feasible with a short learning curve. Although all procedures were performed by a highly experienced operator, remote AF ablation can be performed even by less experienced operators.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645409828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645409828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.058

DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.058

M3 - Article

C2 - 16580527

AN - SCOPUS:33645409828

VL - 47

SP - 1390

EP - 1400

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 7

ER -