Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: Which should we use?

Francesco Fanfani, Stefano Restaino, Alfredo Ercoli, Vito Chiantera, Anna Fagotti, Valerio Gallotta, Giorgia Monterossi, Serena Cappuccio, Giovanni Scambia

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

This review of the literature aims at assessing the safety and effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in benign and malignant gynecological diseases. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy is already widely used in the United States and Europe for the main gynecological procedure - hysterectomy - and has proved feasible and comfortable for other benign and malignant gynecological procedures. However, the clinical effectiveness and safety of robotic surgery compared with standard laparoscopy have not been undoubtedly established. We reviewed the literature by searching in the Ovid/MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases for all the articles published from January 1995 to September 2015. More rigorous experimental studies are needed, that compare robotic-assisted surgery and laparoscopic surgery for gynecological diseases. However, current data seem to encourage the use of minimally-invasive surgery to treat benign and malignant gynecological diseases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-430
Number of pages8
JournalMinerva Ginecologica
Volume68
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

Robotics
Gynecology
Laparoscopy
Safety
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Hysterectomy
PubMed
MEDLINE
Libraries
Databases

Keywords

  • Hysterectomy
  • Laparoscopy
  • Minimally invasive surgical procedures
  • Robotic surgical procedures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Fanfani, F., Restaino, S., Ercoli, A., Chiantera, V., Fagotti, A., Gallotta, V., ... Scambia, G. (2016). Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: Which should we use? Minerva Ginecologica, 68(4), 423-430.

Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology : Which should we use? / Fanfani, Francesco; Restaino, Stefano; Ercoli, Alfredo; Chiantera, Vito; Fagotti, Anna; Gallotta, Valerio; Monterossi, Giorgia; Cappuccio, Serena; Scambia, Giovanni.

In: Minerva Ginecologica, Vol. 68, No. 4, 01.08.2016, p. 423-430.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Fanfani, F, Restaino, S, Ercoli, A, Chiantera, V, Fagotti, A, Gallotta, V, Monterossi, G, Cappuccio, S & Scambia, G 2016, 'Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: Which should we use?', Minerva Ginecologica, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 423-430.
Fanfani F, Restaino S, Ercoli A, Chiantera V, Fagotti A, Gallotta V et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: Which should we use? Minerva Ginecologica. 2016 Aug 1;68(4):423-430.
Fanfani, Francesco ; Restaino, Stefano ; Ercoli, Alfredo ; Chiantera, Vito ; Fagotti, Anna ; Gallotta, Valerio ; Monterossi, Giorgia ; Cappuccio, Serena ; Scambia, Giovanni. / Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology : Which should we use?. In: Minerva Ginecologica. 2016 ; Vol. 68, No. 4. pp. 423-430.
@article{ec1e28ae92e34f41a14d1e2b8f14a7e6,
title = "Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: Which should we use?",
abstract = "This review of the literature aims at assessing the safety and effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in benign and malignant gynecological diseases. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy is already widely used in the United States and Europe for the main gynecological procedure - hysterectomy - and has proved feasible and comfortable for other benign and malignant gynecological procedures. However, the clinical effectiveness and safety of robotic surgery compared with standard laparoscopy have not been undoubtedly established. We reviewed the literature by searching in the Ovid/MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases for all the articles published from January 1995 to September 2015. More rigorous experimental studies are needed, that compare robotic-assisted surgery and laparoscopic surgery for gynecological diseases. However, current data seem to encourage the use of minimally-invasive surgery to treat benign and malignant gynecological diseases.",
keywords = "Hysterectomy, Laparoscopy, Minimally invasive surgical procedures, Robotic surgical procedures",
author = "Francesco Fanfani and Stefano Restaino and Alfredo Ercoli and Vito Chiantera and Anna Fagotti and Valerio Gallotta and Giorgia Monterossi and Serena Cappuccio and Giovanni Scambia",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "423--430",
journal = "Minerva Ginecologica",
issn = "0026-4784",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology

T2 - Which should we use?

AU - Fanfani, Francesco

AU - Restaino, Stefano

AU - Ercoli, Alfredo

AU - Chiantera, Vito

AU - Fagotti, Anna

AU - Gallotta, Valerio

AU - Monterossi, Giorgia

AU - Cappuccio, Serena

AU - Scambia, Giovanni

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - This review of the literature aims at assessing the safety and effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in benign and malignant gynecological diseases. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy is already widely used in the United States and Europe for the main gynecological procedure - hysterectomy - and has proved feasible and comfortable for other benign and malignant gynecological procedures. However, the clinical effectiveness and safety of robotic surgery compared with standard laparoscopy have not been undoubtedly established. We reviewed the literature by searching in the Ovid/MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases for all the articles published from January 1995 to September 2015. More rigorous experimental studies are needed, that compare robotic-assisted surgery and laparoscopic surgery for gynecological diseases. However, current data seem to encourage the use of minimally-invasive surgery to treat benign and malignant gynecological diseases.

AB - This review of the literature aims at assessing the safety and effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in benign and malignant gynecological diseases. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy is already widely used in the United States and Europe for the main gynecological procedure - hysterectomy - and has proved feasible and comfortable for other benign and malignant gynecological procedures. However, the clinical effectiveness and safety of robotic surgery compared with standard laparoscopy have not been undoubtedly established. We reviewed the literature by searching in the Ovid/MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases for all the articles published from January 1995 to September 2015. More rigorous experimental studies are needed, that compare robotic-assisted surgery and laparoscopic surgery for gynecological diseases. However, current data seem to encourage the use of minimally-invasive surgery to treat benign and malignant gynecological diseases.

KW - Hysterectomy

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Minimally invasive surgical procedures

KW - Robotic surgical procedures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978427341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978427341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84978427341

VL - 68

SP - 423

EP - 430

JO - Minerva Ginecologica

JF - Minerva Ginecologica

SN - 0026-4784

IS - 4

ER -