Role of contrast enhanced ultrasound in acute scrotal diseases

Massimo Valentino, Michele Bertolotto, Lorenzo Derchi, Alessandro Bertaccini, Pietro Pavlica, Giuseppe Martorana, Libero Barozzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients with acute scrotal pain not defined at ultrasound (US) with colour Doppler . Methods: CEUS was carried out in 50 patients with acute scrotal pain or scrotal trauma showing testicular lesion of undefined nature at US. The accuracy of US and CEUS findings versus definitive diagnosis (surgery or follow-up) was calculated. Results: Twenty-three patients had a final diagnosis of testicular tumour, three abscess, eight focal infarction, seven trauma, three testicular torsion, one haematoma. Five patients were negative. Thirty-five patients were operated (23 testicular tumours, six trauma, three testicular torsion, one abscess, one focal infarction, and one haematoma) and 15 underwent medical treatment or were discharged. US provided a definitive diagnosis in 34/50 as compared to the 48/50 patients diagnosed at CEUS. Sensitivity and specificity were 76% and 45% for US and 96% and 100% for CEUS respectively. Conclusions: CEUS was more accurate in the final diagnosis compared to US, potentially reducing the need for further imaging. In particular CEUS can be proposed in emergency in cases where US diagnosis remains inconclusive, namely in infarction, and trauma, when testicular torsion cannot be ruled out, and in identifying testicular mass.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1831-1840
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Radiology
Volume21
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Fingerprint

Acute Disease
Spermatic Cord Torsion
Infarction
Testicular Neoplasms
Wounds and Injuries
Acute Pain
Hematoma
Abscess
Emergencies
Color
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Acute scrotal pain
  • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound
  • Testis
  • Trauma
  • Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Valentino, M., Bertolotto, M., Derchi, L., Bertaccini, A., Pavlica, P., Martorana, G., & Barozzi, L. (2011). Role of contrast enhanced ultrasound in acute scrotal diseases. European Radiology, 21(9), 1831-1840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-2039-5

Role of contrast enhanced ultrasound in acute scrotal diseases. / Valentino, Massimo; Bertolotto, Michele; Derchi, Lorenzo; Bertaccini, Alessandro; Pavlica, Pietro; Martorana, Giuseppe; Barozzi, Libero.

In: European Radiology, Vol. 21, No. 9, 09.2011, p. 1831-1840.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valentino, M, Bertolotto, M, Derchi, L, Bertaccini, A, Pavlica, P, Martorana, G & Barozzi, L 2011, 'Role of contrast enhanced ultrasound in acute scrotal diseases', European Radiology, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1831-1840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-2039-5
Valentino M, Bertolotto M, Derchi L, Bertaccini A, Pavlica P, Martorana G et al. Role of contrast enhanced ultrasound in acute scrotal diseases. European Radiology. 2011 Sep;21(9):1831-1840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-2039-5
Valentino, Massimo ; Bertolotto, Michele ; Derchi, Lorenzo ; Bertaccini, Alessandro ; Pavlica, Pietro ; Martorana, Giuseppe ; Barozzi, Libero. / Role of contrast enhanced ultrasound in acute scrotal diseases. In: European Radiology. 2011 ; Vol. 21, No. 9. pp. 1831-1840.
@article{d9df7779a3364c4ebb081a8d4c2f10b1,
title = "Role of contrast enhanced ultrasound in acute scrotal diseases",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients with acute scrotal pain not defined at ultrasound (US) with colour Doppler . Methods: CEUS was carried out in 50 patients with acute scrotal pain or scrotal trauma showing testicular lesion of undefined nature at US. The accuracy of US and CEUS findings versus definitive diagnosis (surgery or follow-up) was calculated. Results: Twenty-three patients had a final diagnosis of testicular tumour, three abscess, eight focal infarction, seven trauma, three testicular torsion, one haematoma. Five patients were negative. Thirty-five patients were operated (23 testicular tumours, six trauma, three testicular torsion, one abscess, one focal infarction, and one haematoma) and 15 underwent medical treatment or were discharged. US provided a definitive diagnosis in 34/50 as compared to the 48/50 patients diagnosed at CEUS. Sensitivity and specificity were 76{\%} and 45{\%} for US and 96{\%} and 100{\%} for CEUS respectively. Conclusions: CEUS was more accurate in the final diagnosis compared to US, potentially reducing the need for further imaging. In particular CEUS can be proposed in emergency in cases where US diagnosis remains inconclusive, namely in infarction, and trauma, when testicular torsion cannot be ruled out, and in identifying testicular mass.",
keywords = "Acute scrotal pain, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, Testis, Trauma, Ultrasonography",
author = "Massimo Valentino and Michele Bertolotto and Lorenzo Derchi and Alessandro Bertaccini and Pietro Pavlica and Giuseppe Martorana and Libero Barozzi",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s00330-010-2039-5",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1831--1840",
journal = "European Radiology",
issn = "0938-7994",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role of contrast enhanced ultrasound in acute scrotal diseases

AU - Valentino, Massimo

AU - Bertolotto, Michele

AU - Derchi, Lorenzo

AU - Bertaccini, Alessandro

AU - Pavlica, Pietro

AU - Martorana, Giuseppe

AU - Barozzi, Libero

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients with acute scrotal pain not defined at ultrasound (US) with colour Doppler . Methods: CEUS was carried out in 50 patients with acute scrotal pain or scrotal trauma showing testicular lesion of undefined nature at US. The accuracy of US and CEUS findings versus definitive diagnosis (surgery or follow-up) was calculated. Results: Twenty-three patients had a final diagnosis of testicular tumour, three abscess, eight focal infarction, seven trauma, three testicular torsion, one haematoma. Five patients were negative. Thirty-five patients were operated (23 testicular tumours, six trauma, three testicular torsion, one abscess, one focal infarction, and one haematoma) and 15 underwent medical treatment or were discharged. US provided a definitive diagnosis in 34/50 as compared to the 48/50 patients diagnosed at CEUS. Sensitivity and specificity were 76% and 45% for US and 96% and 100% for CEUS respectively. Conclusions: CEUS was more accurate in the final diagnosis compared to US, potentially reducing the need for further imaging. In particular CEUS can be proposed in emergency in cases where US diagnosis remains inconclusive, namely in infarction, and trauma, when testicular torsion cannot be ruled out, and in identifying testicular mass.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients with acute scrotal pain not defined at ultrasound (US) with colour Doppler . Methods: CEUS was carried out in 50 patients with acute scrotal pain or scrotal trauma showing testicular lesion of undefined nature at US. The accuracy of US and CEUS findings versus definitive diagnosis (surgery or follow-up) was calculated. Results: Twenty-three patients had a final diagnosis of testicular tumour, three abscess, eight focal infarction, seven trauma, three testicular torsion, one haematoma. Five patients were negative. Thirty-five patients were operated (23 testicular tumours, six trauma, three testicular torsion, one abscess, one focal infarction, and one haematoma) and 15 underwent medical treatment or were discharged. US provided a definitive diagnosis in 34/50 as compared to the 48/50 patients diagnosed at CEUS. Sensitivity and specificity were 76% and 45% for US and 96% and 100% for CEUS respectively. Conclusions: CEUS was more accurate in the final diagnosis compared to US, potentially reducing the need for further imaging. In particular CEUS can be proposed in emergency in cases where US diagnosis remains inconclusive, namely in infarction, and trauma, when testicular torsion cannot be ruled out, and in identifying testicular mass.

KW - Acute scrotal pain

KW - Contrast-enhanced ultrasound

KW - Testis

KW - Trauma

KW - Ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052753514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052753514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00330-010-2039-5

DO - 10.1007/s00330-010-2039-5

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 1831

EP - 1840

JO - European Radiology

JF - European Radiology

SN - 0938-7994

IS - 9

ER -