Role of MRI in predicting meniscal tear reparability

Paolo Florent Felisaz, Francesco Alessandrino, Simone Perelli, Giacomo Zanon, Francesco Benazzo, Fabrizio Calliada, Luigi Sammarchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To elucidate the role of MRI in predicting meniscal tear reparability according to tear type and location in relation to vascular zones. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, two readers evaluated 79 pre-surgical MRIs of meniscal tears arthroscopically treated with meniscectomy or meniscal repair. Tears were classified according to type into vertical, horizontal, radial, complex, flaps and bucket handle and were considered reparable if the distance measured from the tear to the menisco-capsular junction was less than or equal to 5 mm. Predictions were compared with the surgical procedure performed in arthroscopy. We assessed the diagnostic performance of MRI, agreement between MRI and arthroscopy, and interrater agreement. Then, we conducted an ROC analysis on the distances measured by the first reader and built a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: MRI had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy, respectively, of 85%, 79%, 86%, 76% and 83% in predicting meniscal tear reparability. Correct predictions for the specific tear pattern were 76% for vertical, 84% for horizontal, 88% for radial, 86% for complex, 84% for flaps and 86% for bucket handle. Agreement between the two readers’ predictions and arthroscopy was good (k = 0.65 and 0.61, respectively). Inter-rater agreement was almost excellent (k = 0.79). The ROC analysis revealed sensitivity and specificity of 73% and 83% with a cutoff value of <4 mm (p < 0.001). Anterior cruciate ligament injury and medial meniscal tear increased the likelihood of meniscal tear reparability. Conclusions: MRI can be a reliable and accurate tool to predict the reparability of meniscal tears, with higher prediction rates for bucket-handle tears.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1343-1351
Number of pages9
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume46
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tears
Arthroscopy
ROC Curve
Logistic Models
Sensitivity and Specificity
Blood Vessels
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Arthroscopy
  • Meniscal repair
  • Meniscectomy
  • Meniscus
  • MRI
  • Predictivity
  • Tear

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Role of MRI in predicting meniscal tear reparability. / Felisaz, Paolo Florent; Alessandrino, Francesco; Perelli, Simone; Zanon, Giacomo; Benazzo, Francesco; Calliada, Fabrizio; Sammarchi, Luigi.

In: Skeletal Radiology, Vol. 46, No. 10, 01.10.2017, p. 1343-1351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Felisaz, Paolo Florent ; Alessandrino, Francesco ; Perelli, Simone ; Zanon, Giacomo ; Benazzo, Francesco ; Calliada, Fabrizio ; Sammarchi, Luigi. / Role of MRI in predicting meniscal tear reparability. In: Skeletal Radiology. 2017 ; Vol. 46, No. 10. pp. 1343-1351.
@article{7aef895220c045efb1f855daf602f35b,
title = "Role of MRI in predicting meniscal tear reparability",
abstract = "Objective: To elucidate the role of MRI in predicting meniscal tear reparability according to tear type and location in relation to vascular zones. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, two readers evaluated 79 pre-surgical MRIs of meniscal tears arthroscopically treated with meniscectomy or meniscal repair. Tears were classified according to type into vertical, horizontal, radial, complex, flaps and bucket handle and were considered reparable if the distance measured from the tear to the menisco-capsular junction was less than or equal to 5 mm. Predictions were compared with the surgical procedure performed in arthroscopy. We assessed the diagnostic performance of MRI, agreement between MRI and arthroscopy, and interrater agreement. Then, we conducted an ROC analysis on the distances measured by the first reader and built a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: MRI had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy, respectively, of 85{\%}, 79{\%}, 86{\%}, 76{\%} and 83{\%} in predicting meniscal tear reparability. Correct predictions for the specific tear pattern were 76{\%} for vertical, 84{\%} for horizontal, 88{\%} for radial, 86{\%} for complex, 84{\%} for flaps and 86{\%} for bucket handle. Agreement between the two readers’ predictions and arthroscopy was good (k = 0.65 and 0.61, respectively). Inter-rater agreement was almost excellent (k = 0.79). The ROC analysis revealed sensitivity and specificity of 73{\%} and 83{\%} with a cutoff value of <4 mm (p < 0.001). Anterior cruciate ligament injury and medial meniscal tear increased the likelihood of meniscal tear reparability. Conclusions: MRI can be a reliable and accurate tool to predict the reparability of meniscal tears, with higher prediction rates for bucket-handle tears.",
keywords = "Arthroscopy, Meniscal repair, Meniscectomy, Meniscus, MRI, Predictivity, Tear",
author = "Felisaz, {Paolo Florent} and Francesco Alessandrino and Simone Perelli and Giacomo Zanon and Francesco Benazzo and Fabrizio Calliada and Luigi Sammarchi",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00256-017-2700-z",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "1343--1351",
journal = "Skeletal Radiology",
issn = "0364-2348",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role of MRI in predicting meniscal tear reparability

AU - Felisaz, Paolo Florent

AU - Alessandrino, Francesco

AU - Perelli, Simone

AU - Zanon, Giacomo

AU - Benazzo, Francesco

AU - Calliada, Fabrizio

AU - Sammarchi, Luigi

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Objective: To elucidate the role of MRI in predicting meniscal tear reparability according to tear type and location in relation to vascular zones. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, two readers evaluated 79 pre-surgical MRIs of meniscal tears arthroscopically treated with meniscectomy or meniscal repair. Tears were classified according to type into vertical, horizontal, radial, complex, flaps and bucket handle and were considered reparable if the distance measured from the tear to the menisco-capsular junction was less than or equal to 5 mm. Predictions were compared with the surgical procedure performed in arthroscopy. We assessed the diagnostic performance of MRI, agreement between MRI and arthroscopy, and interrater agreement. Then, we conducted an ROC analysis on the distances measured by the first reader and built a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: MRI had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy, respectively, of 85%, 79%, 86%, 76% and 83% in predicting meniscal tear reparability. Correct predictions for the specific tear pattern were 76% for vertical, 84% for horizontal, 88% for radial, 86% for complex, 84% for flaps and 86% for bucket handle. Agreement between the two readers’ predictions and arthroscopy was good (k = 0.65 and 0.61, respectively). Inter-rater agreement was almost excellent (k = 0.79). The ROC analysis revealed sensitivity and specificity of 73% and 83% with a cutoff value of <4 mm (p < 0.001). Anterior cruciate ligament injury and medial meniscal tear increased the likelihood of meniscal tear reparability. Conclusions: MRI can be a reliable and accurate tool to predict the reparability of meniscal tears, with higher prediction rates for bucket-handle tears.

AB - Objective: To elucidate the role of MRI in predicting meniscal tear reparability according to tear type and location in relation to vascular zones. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, two readers evaluated 79 pre-surgical MRIs of meniscal tears arthroscopically treated with meniscectomy or meniscal repair. Tears were classified according to type into vertical, horizontal, radial, complex, flaps and bucket handle and were considered reparable if the distance measured from the tear to the menisco-capsular junction was less than or equal to 5 mm. Predictions were compared with the surgical procedure performed in arthroscopy. We assessed the diagnostic performance of MRI, agreement between MRI and arthroscopy, and interrater agreement. Then, we conducted an ROC analysis on the distances measured by the first reader and built a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: MRI had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy, respectively, of 85%, 79%, 86%, 76% and 83% in predicting meniscal tear reparability. Correct predictions for the specific tear pattern were 76% for vertical, 84% for horizontal, 88% for radial, 86% for complex, 84% for flaps and 86% for bucket handle. Agreement between the two readers’ predictions and arthroscopy was good (k = 0.65 and 0.61, respectively). Inter-rater agreement was almost excellent (k = 0.79). The ROC analysis revealed sensitivity and specificity of 73% and 83% with a cutoff value of <4 mm (p < 0.001). Anterior cruciate ligament injury and medial meniscal tear increased the likelihood of meniscal tear reparability. Conclusions: MRI can be a reliable and accurate tool to predict the reparability of meniscal tears, with higher prediction rates for bucket-handle tears.

KW - Arthroscopy

KW - Meniscal repair

KW - Meniscectomy

KW - Meniscus

KW - MRI

KW - Predictivity

KW - Tear

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021104865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021104865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00256-017-2700-z

DO - 10.1007/s00256-017-2700-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85021104865

VL - 46

SP - 1343

EP - 1351

JO - Skeletal Radiology

JF - Skeletal Radiology

SN - 0364-2348

IS - 10

ER -