Rotational and peak torque stiffness of rugby shoes

Moez S. Ballal, Federico Giuseppe Usuelli, Umberto Alfieri Montrasio, Andy Molloy, Luigi La Barbera, Tomaso Villa, Giuseppe Banfi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Sports people always strive to avoid injury. Sports shoe designs in many sports have been shown to affect traction and injury rates. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the differing stiffness and torque in rugby boots that are designed for the same effect. Methods: Five different types of rugby shoes commonly worn by scrum forwards were laboratory tested for rotational stiffness and peak torque on a natural playing surface generating force patterns that would be consistent with a rugby scrum. Results: The overall internal rotation peak torque was 57.75 ± 6.26. N. m while that of external rotation was 56.55 ± 4.36. N. m. The Peak internal and external rotational stiffness were 0.696 ± 0.1 and 0.708 ± 0.06. N. m/deg respectively. Our results, when compared to rotational stiffness and peak torques of football shoes published in the literature, show that shoes worn by rugby players exert higher rotational and peak torque stiffness compared to football shoes when tested on the same natural surfaces. There was significant difference between the tested rugby shoes brands. Conclusion: In our opinion, to maximize potential performance and lower the potential of non-contact injury, care should be taken in choosing boots with stiffness appropriate to the players main playing role.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-110
Number of pages4
JournalFoot
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Shoes
Football
Torque
Sports
Wounds and Injuries
Traction

Keywords

  • Rotational
  • Rugby
  • Shoes
  • Stiffness
  • Torque

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Podiatry
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Ballal, M. S., Usuelli, F. G., Montrasio, U. A., Molloy, A., La Barbera, L., Villa, T., & Banfi, G. (2014). Rotational and peak torque stiffness of rugby shoes. Foot, 24(3), 107-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2014.06.006

Rotational and peak torque stiffness of rugby shoes. / Ballal, Moez S.; Usuelli, Federico Giuseppe; Montrasio, Umberto Alfieri; Molloy, Andy; La Barbera, Luigi; Villa, Tomaso; Banfi, Giuseppe.

In: Foot, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2014, p. 107-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ballal, MS, Usuelli, FG, Montrasio, UA, Molloy, A, La Barbera, L, Villa, T & Banfi, G 2014, 'Rotational and peak torque stiffness of rugby shoes', Foot, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 107-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2014.06.006
Ballal MS, Usuelli FG, Montrasio UA, Molloy A, La Barbera L, Villa T et al. Rotational and peak torque stiffness of rugby shoes. Foot. 2014;24(3):107-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2014.06.006
Ballal, Moez S. ; Usuelli, Federico Giuseppe ; Montrasio, Umberto Alfieri ; Molloy, Andy ; La Barbera, Luigi ; Villa, Tomaso ; Banfi, Giuseppe. / Rotational and peak torque stiffness of rugby shoes. In: Foot. 2014 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 107-110.
@article{c30a7fbff0024827bbcb019787b5383d,
title = "Rotational and peak torque stiffness of rugby shoes",
abstract = "Objective: Sports people always strive to avoid injury. Sports shoe designs in many sports have been shown to affect traction and injury rates. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the differing stiffness and torque in rugby boots that are designed for the same effect. Methods: Five different types of rugby shoes commonly worn by scrum forwards were laboratory tested for rotational stiffness and peak torque on a natural playing surface generating force patterns that would be consistent with a rugby scrum. Results: The overall internal rotation peak torque was 57.75 ± 6.26. N. m while that of external rotation was 56.55 ± 4.36. N. m. The Peak internal and external rotational stiffness were 0.696 ± 0.1 and 0.708 ± 0.06. N. m/deg respectively. Our results, when compared to rotational stiffness and peak torques of football shoes published in the literature, show that shoes worn by rugby players exert higher rotational and peak torque stiffness compared to football shoes when tested on the same natural surfaces. There was significant difference between the tested rugby shoes brands. Conclusion: In our opinion, to maximize potential performance and lower the potential of non-contact injury, care should be taken in choosing boots with stiffness appropriate to the players main playing role.",
keywords = "Rotational, Rugby, Shoes, Stiffness, Torque",
author = "Ballal, {Moez S.} and Usuelli, {Federico Giuseppe} and Montrasio, {Umberto Alfieri} and Andy Molloy and {La Barbera}, Luigi and Tomaso Villa and Giuseppe Banfi",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.foot.2014.06.006",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "107--110",
journal = "Foot",
issn = "0958-2592",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rotational and peak torque stiffness of rugby shoes

AU - Ballal, Moez S.

AU - Usuelli, Federico Giuseppe

AU - Montrasio, Umberto Alfieri

AU - Molloy, Andy

AU - La Barbera, Luigi

AU - Villa, Tomaso

AU - Banfi, Giuseppe

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: Sports people always strive to avoid injury. Sports shoe designs in many sports have been shown to affect traction and injury rates. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the differing stiffness and torque in rugby boots that are designed for the same effect. Methods: Five different types of rugby shoes commonly worn by scrum forwards were laboratory tested for rotational stiffness and peak torque on a natural playing surface generating force patterns that would be consistent with a rugby scrum. Results: The overall internal rotation peak torque was 57.75 ± 6.26. N. m while that of external rotation was 56.55 ± 4.36. N. m. The Peak internal and external rotational stiffness were 0.696 ± 0.1 and 0.708 ± 0.06. N. m/deg respectively. Our results, when compared to rotational stiffness and peak torques of football shoes published in the literature, show that shoes worn by rugby players exert higher rotational and peak torque stiffness compared to football shoes when tested on the same natural surfaces. There was significant difference between the tested rugby shoes brands. Conclusion: In our opinion, to maximize potential performance and lower the potential of non-contact injury, care should be taken in choosing boots with stiffness appropriate to the players main playing role.

AB - Objective: Sports people always strive to avoid injury. Sports shoe designs in many sports have been shown to affect traction and injury rates. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the differing stiffness and torque in rugby boots that are designed for the same effect. Methods: Five different types of rugby shoes commonly worn by scrum forwards were laboratory tested for rotational stiffness and peak torque on a natural playing surface generating force patterns that would be consistent with a rugby scrum. Results: The overall internal rotation peak torque was 57.75 ± 6.26. N. m while that of external rotation was 56.55 ± 4.36. N. m. The Peak internal and external rotational stiffness were 0.696 ± 0.1 and 0.708 ± 0.06. N. m/deg respectively. Our results, when compared to rotational stiffness and peak torques of football shoes published in the literature, show that shoes worn by rugby players exert higher rotational and peak torque stiffness compared to football shoes when tested on the same natural surfaces. There was significant difference between the tested rugby shoes brands. Conclusion: In our opinion, to maximize potential performance and lower the potential of non-contact injury, care should be taken in choosing boots with stiffness appropriate to the players main playing role.

KW - Rotational

KW - Rugby

KW - Shoes

KW - Stiffness

KW - Torque

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906789987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906789987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foot.2014.06.006

DO - 10.1016/j.foot.2014.06.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 25095720

AN - SCOPUS:84906789987

VL - 24

SP - 107

EP - 110

JO - Foot

JF - Foot

SN - 0958-2592

IS - 3

ER -