Routine Anterior Approach During Right Hepatectomy

Results of a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial

Lorenzo Capussotti, Alessandro Ferrero, Nadia Russolillo, Serena Langella, Roberto Lo Tesoriere, Luca Viganò

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Trial Design: A prospective randomised controlled trial was designed to evaluate the advantages of routine application of the anterior approach during right hepatectomy. Methods: The study was conducted between March 2005 and April 2009 in a tertiary hepatobiliary-pancreatic centre. Patients scheduled for right hepatectomy for primary or metastatic tumours, without infiltration of segment 1, inferior vena cava or main bile duct, were randomly assigned to right hepatectomy using either an anterior or a classic approach. The primary study endpoint was overall blood loss. Results: Sixty-six patients were randomly allocated to undergo right hepatectomy with an anterior (AA group n = 33) or a classic approach (CA group n = 33). Sixty-five patients were included in the analysis (33 in AA group and 32 in CA group). There was no significant difference in patient age, diagnosis, preoperative hepatic biochemistry and tumour size between the two groups. Overall blood loss (437 ml ± 664 in AA group vs. 500 ml ± 532.3 in CA group; p = 0.960) and bleeding during transection (p = 0.973) were similar between two groups. Perioperative blood transfusion rates were 18% in the AA group and 9.3% in the CA group (p = 0.253). Time of parenchymal transsection was significantly longer in AA group (75.1 ± 26.6 min vs. 56.7 ± 17.5 min, p = 0.01). There was no difference between both groups for postoperative prothrombin time, serum transaminase and total bilirubin levels. One patient died in each group (p = 0.746). The two groups had similar morbidity rates. Conclusion: Routine application of the anterior approach during right hepatectomy does not decrease intraoperative blood loss and morbidity rate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1324-1332
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume16
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Hepatectomy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Morbidity
Prothrombin Time
Inferior Vena Cava
Patient Rights
Transaminases
Bile Ducts
Bilirubin
Blood Transfusion
Biochemistry
Neoplasms
Hemorrhage
Liver
Serum

Keywords

  • Anterior approach
  • Bleeding
  • Right hepatectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Routine Anterior Approach During Right Hepatectomy : Results of a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial. / Capussotti, Lorenzo; Ferrero, Alessandro; Russolillo, Nadia; Langella, Serena; Tesoriere, Roberto Lo; Viganò, Luca.

In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 16, No. 7, 07.2012, p. 1324-1332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Capussotti, Lorenzo ; Ferrero, Alessandro ; Russolillo, Nadia ; Langella, Serena ; Tesoriere, Roberto Lo ; Viganò, Luca. / Routine Anterior Approach During Right Hepatectomy : Results of a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial. In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 16, No. 7. pp. 1324-1332.
@article{b30d6501c4ad477aba6aaae1b1edcea8,
title = "Routine Anterior Approach During Right Hepatectomy: Results of a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial",
abstract = "Trial Design: A prospective randomised controlled trial was designed to evaluate the advantages of routine application of the anterior approach during right hepatectomy. Methods: The study was conducted between March 2005 and April 2009 in a tertiary hepatobiliary-pancreatic centre. Patients scheduled for right hepatectomy for primary or metastatic tumours, without infiltration of segment 1, inferior vena cava or main bile duct, were randomly assigned to right hepatectomy using either an anterior or a classic approach. The primary study endpoint was overall blood loss. Results: Sixty-six patients were randomly allocated to undergo right hepatectomy with an anterior (AA group n = 33) or a classic approach (CA group n = 33). Sixty-five patients were included in the analysis (33 in AA group and 32 in CA group). There was no significant difference in patient age, diagnosis, preoperative hepatic biochemistry and tumour size between the two groups. Overall blood loss (437 ml ± 664 in AA group vs. 500 ml ± 532.3 in CA group; p = 0.960) and bleeding during transection (p = 0.973) were similar between two groups. Perioperative blood transfusion rates were 18{\%} in the AA group and 9.3{\%} in the CA group (p = 0.253). Time of parenchymal transsection was significantly longer in AA group (75.1 ± 26.6 min vs. 56.7 ± 17.5 min, p = 0.01). There was no difference between both groups for postoperative prothrombin time, serum transaminase and total bilirubin levels. One patient died in each group (p = 0.746). The two groups had similar morbidity rates. Conclusion: Routine application of the anterior approach during right hepatectomy does not decrease intraoperative blood loss and morbidity rate.",
keywords = "Anterior approach, Bleeding, Right hepatectomy",
author = "Lorenzo Capussotti and Alessandro Ferrero and Nadia Russolillo and Serena Langella and Tesoriere, {Roberto Lo} and Luca Vigan{\`o}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s11605-012-1894-6",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1324--1332",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York LLC",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Routine Anterior Approach During Right Hepatectomy

T2 - Results of a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial

AU - Capussotti, Lorenzo

AU - Ferrero, Alessandro

AU - Russolillo, Nadia

AU - Langella, Serena

AU - Tesoriere, Roberto Lo

AU - Viganò, Luca

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Trial Design: A prospective randomised controlled trial was designed to evaluate the advantages of routine application of the anterior approach during right hepatectomy. Methods: The study was conducted between March 2005 and April 2009 in a tertiary hepatobiliary-pancreatic centre. Patients scheduled for right hepatectomy for primary or metastatic tumours, without infiltration of segment 1, inferior vena cava or main bile duct, were randomly assigned to right hepatectomy using either an anterior or a classic approach. The primary study endpoint was overall blood loss. Results: Sixty-six patients were randomly allocated to undergo right hepatectomy with an anterior (AA group n = 33) or a classic approach (CA group n = 33). Sixty-five patients were included in the analysis (33 in AA group and 32 in CA group). There was no significant difference in patient age, diagnosis, preoperative hepatic biochemistry and tumour size between the two groups. Overall blood loss (437 ml ± 664 in AA group vs. 500 ml ± 532.3 in CA group; p = 0.960) and bleeding during transection (p = 0.973) were similar between two groups. Perioperative blood transfusion rates were 18% in the AA group and 9.3% in the CA group (p = 0.253). Time of parenchymal transsection was significantly longer in AA group (75.1 ± 26.6 min vs. 56.7 ± 17.5 min, p = 0.01). There was no difference between both groups for postoperative prothrombin time, serum transaminase and total bilirubin levels. One patient died in each group (p = 0.746). The two groups had similar morbidity rates. Conclusion: Routine application of the anterior approach during right hepatectomy does not decrease intraoperative blood loss and morbidity rate.

AB - Trial Design: A prospective randomised controlled trial was designed to evaluate the advantages of routine application of the anterior approach during right hepatectomy. Methods: The study was conducted between March 2005 and April 2009 in a tertiary hepatobiliary-pancreatic centre. Patients scheduled for right hepatectomy for primary or metastatic tumours, without infiltration of segment 1, inferior vena cava or main bile duct, were randomly assigned to right hepatectomy using either an anterior or a classic approach. The primary study endpoint was overall blood loss. Results: Sixty-six patients were randomly allocated to undergo right hepatectomy with an anterior (AA group n = 33) or a classic approach (CA group n = 33). Sixty-five patients were included in the analysis (33 in AA group and 32 in CA group). There was no significant difference in patient age, diagnosis, preoperative hepatic biochemistry and tumour size between the two groups. Overall blood loss (437 ml ± 664 in AA group vs. 500 ml ± 532.3 in CA group; p = 0.960) and bleeding during transection (p = 0.973) were similar between two groups. Perioperative blood transfusion rates were 18% in the AA group and 9.3% in the CA group (p = 0.253). Time of parenchymal transsection was significantly longer in AA group (75.1 ± 26.6 min vs. 56.7 ± 17.5 min, p = 0.01). There was no difference between both groups for postoperative prothrombin time, serum transaminase and total bilirubin levels. One patient died in each group (p = 0.746). The two groups had similar morbidity rates. Conclusion: Routine application of the anterior approach during right hepatectomy does not decrease intraoperative blood loss and morbidity rate.

KW - Anterior approach

KW - Bleeding

KW - Right hepatectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862497151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862497151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11605-012-1894-6

DO - 10.1007/s11605-012-1894-6

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 1324

EP - 1332

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

IS - 7

ER -