Safety and feasibility of coronary sinus left ventricular leads extraction: A preliminary report

Giuseppe De Martino, Serafino Orazi, Giovanni Bisignani, Salvatore Toscano, Loredana Messano, Quintino Parisi, Matteo Santamaria, Gemma Pelargonio, Antonio Dello Russo, Fulvio Bellocci, Paolo Zecchi, Filippo Crea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: transvenous positioning of the left ventricular (LV) lead in a branch of the coronary sinus (CS) is generally the preferred implantation technique in biventricular pacing. Very few data are reported about removal of LV pacing leads positioned in a CS branch. Aim of the study was to describe our experience with percutaneous extraction of LV pacing leads in order to evaluate feasibility and safety of this procedure. Methods: we enrolled 392 patients who underwent a biventricular pacing implant. The indication for catheter removal was considered in case of definite diagnosis of infection and in some cases of lead dislodgement or diaphragmatic stimulation. LV lead extraction was first attempted by manual traction; in case of failure a locking stylet or locking stylet plus radiofrequency could be used. Results: twelve of 392 patients implanted needed LV lead removal. The leads had been in place for 13.9 ± 11.7 months. Extraction was indicated in 5 of them for LV lead dislodgement or diaphragmatic stimulation, and in 7 patients for lead infection. In all cases manual traction succeeded to remove the LV lead. In 7 cases of infection, the right atrial and ventricular leads were removed. The mean total procedure time was 69 ± 22 min. No complications were observed. Conclusions: our study suggests that CS leads could be easily and safely removed without any complication, also when placed in a CS branch, at least for relatively young catheters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-38
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Coronary Sinus
Safety
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Traction
Catheters
Infection
Lead

Keywords

  • Biventricular pacing
  • Cardiac resynchronization
  • Coronary sinus
  • Lead extraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Safety and feasibility of coronary sinus left ventricular leads extraction : A preliminary report. / De Martino, Giuseppe; Orazi, Serafino; Bisignani, Giovanni; Toscano, Salvatore; Messano, Loredana; Parisi, Quintino; Santamaria, Matteo; Pelargonio, Gemma; Dello Russo, Antonio; Bellocci, Fulvio; Zecchi, Paolo; Crea, Filippo.

In: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, Vol. 13, No. 1, 06.2005, p. 35-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

De Martino, G, Orazi, S, Bisignani, G, Toscano, S, Messano, L, Parisi, Q, Santamaria, M, Pelargonio, G, Dello Russo, A, Bellocci, F, Zecchi, P & Crea, F 2005, 'Safety and feasibility of coronary sinus left ventricular leads extraction: A preliminary report', Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 35-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-005-0910-0
De Martino, Giuseppe ; Orazi, Serafino ; Bisignani, Giovanni ; Toscano, Salvatore ; Messano, Loredana ; Parisi, Quintino ; Santamaria, Matteo ; Pelargonio, Gemma ; Dello Russo, Antonio ; Bellocci, Fulvio ; Zecchi, Paolo ; Crea, Filippo. / Safety and feasibility of coronary sinus left ventricular leads extraction : A preliminary report. In: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology. 2005 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 35-38.
@article{71e0fceca0674d95a81f00a35eebdf5b,
title = "Safety and feasibility of coronary sinus left ventricular leads extraction: A preliminary report",
abstract = "Background: transvenous positioning of the left ventricular (LV) lead in a branch of the coronary sinus (CS) is generally the preferred implantation technique in biventricular pacing. Very few data are reported about removal of LV pacing leads positioned in a CS branch. Aim of the study was to describe our experience with percutaneous extraction of LV pacing leads in order to evaluate feasibility and safety of this procedure. Methods: we enrolled 392 patients who underwent a biventricular pacing implant. The indication for catheter removal was considered in case of definite diagnosis of infection and in some cases of lead dislodgement or diaphragmatic stimulation. LV lead extraction was first attempted by manual traction; in case of failure a locking stylet or locking stylet plus radiofrequency could be used. Results: twelve of 392 patients implanted needed LV lead removal. The leads had been in place for 13.9 ± 11.7 months. Extraction was indicated in 5 of them for LV lead dislodgement or diaphragmatic stimulation, and in 7 patients for lead infection. In all cases manual traction succeeded to remove the LV lead. In 7 cases of infection, the right atrial and ventricular leads were removed. The mean total procedure time was 69 ± 22 min. No complications were observed. Conclusions: our study suggests that CS leads could be easily and safely removed without any complication, also when placed in a CS branch, at least for relatively young catheters.",
keywords = "Biventricular pacing, Cardiac resynchronization, Coronary sinus, Lead extraction",
author = "{De Martino}, Giuseppe and Serafino Orazi and Giovanni Bisignani and Salvatore Toscano and Loredana Messano and Quintino Parisi and Matteo Santamaria and Gemma Pelargonio and {Dello Russo}, Antonio and Fulvio Bellocci and Paolo Zecchi and Filippo Crea",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10840-005-0910-0",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "35--38",
journal = "Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology",
issn = "1383-875X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety and feasibility of coronary sinus left ventricular leads extraction

T2 - A preliminary report

AU - De Martino, Giuseppe

AU - Orazi, Serafino

AU - Bisignani, Giovanni

AU - Toscano, Salvatore

AU - Messano, Loredana

AU - Parisi, Quintino

AU - Santamaria, Matteo

AU - Pelargonio, Gemma

AU - Dello Russo, Antonio

AU - Bellocci, Fulvio

AU - Zecchi, Paolo

AU - Crea, Filippo

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Background: transvenous positioning of the left ventricular (LV) lead in a branch of the coronary sinus (CS) is generally the preferred implantation technique in biventricular pacing. Very few data are reported about removal of LV pacing leads positioned in a CS branch. Aim of the study was to describe our experience with percutaneous extraction of LV pacing leads in order to evaluate feasibility and safety of this procedure. Methods: we enrolled 392 patients who underwent a biventricular pacing implant. The indication for catheter removal was considered in case of definite diagnosis of infection and in some cases of lead dislodgement or diaphragmatic stimulation. LV lead extraction was first attempted by manual traction; in case of failure a locking stylet or locking stylet plus radiofrequency could be used. Results: twelve of 392 patients implanted needed LV lead removal. The leads had been in place for 13.9 ± 11.7 months. Extraction was indicated in 5 of them for LV lead dislodgement or diaphragmatic stimulation, and in 7 patients for lead infection. In all cases manual traction succeeded to remove the LV lead. In 7 cases of infection, the right atrial and ventricular leads were removed. The mean total procedure time was 69 ± 22 min. No complications were observed. Conclusions: our study suggests that CS leads could be easily and safely removed without any complication, also when placed in a CS branch, at least for relatively young catheters.

AB - Background: transvenous positioning of the left ventricular (LV) lead in a branch of the coronary sinus (CS) is generally the preferred implantation technique in biventricular pacing. Very few data are reported about removal of LV pacing leads positioned in a CS branch. Aim of the study was to describe our experience with percutaneous extraction of LV pacing leads in order to evaluate feasibility and safety of this procedure. Methods: we enrolled 392 patients who underwent a biventricular pacing implant. The indication for catheter removal was considered in case of definite diagnosis of infection and in some cases of lead dislodgement or diaphragmatic stimulation. LV lead extraction was first attempted by manual traction; in case of failure a locking stylet or locking stylet plus radiofrequency could be used. Results: twelve of 392 patients implanted needed LV lead removal. The leads had been in place for 13.9 ± 11.7 months. Extraction was indicated in 5 of them for LV lead dislodgement or diaphragmatic stimulation, and in 7 patients for lead infection. In all cases manual traction succeeded to remove the LV lead. In 7 cases of infection, the right atrial and ventricular leads were removed. The mean total procedure time was 69 ± 22 min. No complications were observed. Conclusions: our study suggests that CS leads could be easily and safely removed without any complication, also when placed in a CS branch, at least for relatively young catheters.

KW - Biventricular pacing

KW - Cardiac resynchronization

KW - Coronary sinus

KW - Lead extraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20844462396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20844462396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10840-005-0910-0

DO - 10.1007/s10840-005-0910-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 15976976

AN - SCOPUS:20844462396

VL - 13

SP - 35

EP - 38

JO - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

JF - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

SN - 1383-875X

IS - 1

ER -