Abstract
Background & aims: Safety and growth adequacy of infant formulae enriched by functional ingredients need stringent evaluation by means of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), therefore we performed a double-blind RCT to evaluate an infant formula enriched with galacto-oligosaccharides, beta-palmitate, and acidified milk vs. a standard infant formula. Methods: Weight, length, head circumference and fecal bacteria (Bifidobacteria, BIF/Clostridia, CLO) were measured in healthy full term infants, at baseline - as before 21 days of life - at 60 and 135 days thereafter. A group of 51 neonates received the enriched formula (ENR), 59 the standard one (ST). Parents were trained to daily register gastrointestinal diseases. Results: All the infants grew homogeneously increasing the anthropometric parameters and complying with WHO and Italian standards: the mean (SD) difference in daily weight between ENR and ST groups was -0.74 (1.13) g/day, corresponding to a 90% CI of -2.62 to 1.13 g/day, well within the postulated interval of equivalence of -3.9 to +3.9 g/day. A statistical improvement in BIF concentration in the microbiota of infants fed by ENR was recorded. There was no between-group change in log10CLO, but log10BIF increase was higher at T2 vs. T0 in ENR (treatment × time interaction = 0.71, 95% CI 0.08-1.34, p = 0.028) than in ST neonates. This corresponds to estimated mean (95% CI) values of 8.37 (8.04-8.69) log10-units for ENR vs. 8.08 (7.77-8.39) log10-units for ST neonates. Gastrointestinal effects were mild and similar, with no statistical difference between two groups. Conclusion: Safety and growth ability of the enriched formula has been confirmed. A positive effect on neonatal gut microbiota, consisting of increased fecal BIF counts at T2 vs. baseline has been shown too. Nonetheless, larger RCTs are needed to estimate with greater precision the effective potential attributable to the enriched formula on neonatal microbiota, with particular reference to the mode of delivery.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Clinical Nutrition |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - May 29 2015 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Bifidobacteria
- Formula
- Microbiota
- Neonate
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Nutrition and Dietetics
Cite this
Safety, growth, and support to healthy gut microbiota by an infant formula enriched with functional compounds. / Civardi, Elisa; Garofoli, Francesca; Longo, Stefania; Mongini, Maria Elisa; Grenci, Beatrice; Mazzucchelli, Iolanda; Angelini, Micol; Castellazzi, Annamaria; Fasano, Francesca; Grinzato, Alessia; Fanos, Vassilios; Budelli, Andrea; Stronati, Mauro.
In: Clinical Nutrition, 29.05.2015.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety, growth, and support to healthy gut microbiota by an infant formula enriched with functional compounds
AU - Civardi, Elisa
AU - Garofoli, Francesca
AU - Longo, Stefania
AU - Mongini, Maria Elisa
AU - Grenci, Beatrice
AU - Mazzucchelli, Iolanda
AU - Angelini, Micol
AU - Castellazzi, Annamaria
AU - Fasano, Francesca
AU - Grinzato, Alessia
AU - Fanos, Vassilios
AU - Budelli, Andrea
AU - Stronati, Mauro
PY - 2015/5/29
Y1 - 2015/5/29
N2 - Background & aims: Safety and growth adequacy of infant formulae enriched by functional ingredients need stringent evaluation by means of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), therefore we performed a double-blind RCT to evaluate an infant formula enriched with galacto-oligosaccharides, beta-palmitate, and acidified milk vs. a standard infant formula. Methods: Weight, length, head circumference and fecal bacteria (Bifidobacteria, BIF/Clostridia, CLO) were measured in healthy full term infants, at baseline - as before 21 days of life - at 60 and 135 days thereafter. A group of 51 neonates received the enriched formula (ENR), 59 the standard one (ST). Parents were trained to daily register gastrointestinal diseases. Results: All the infants grew homogeneously increasing the anthropometric parameters and complying with WHO and Italian standards: the mean (SD) difference in daily weight between ENR and ST groups was -0.74 (1.13) g/day, corresponding to a 90% CI of -2.62 to 1.13 g/day, well within the postulated interval of equivalence of -3.9 to +3.9 g/day. A statistical improvement in BIF concentration in the microbiota of infants fed by ENR was recorded. There was no between-group change in log10CLO, but log10BIF increase was higher at T2 vs. T0 in ENR (treatment × time interaction = 0.71, 95% CI 0.08-1.34, p = 0.028) than in ST neonates. This corresponds to estimated mean (95% CI) values of 8.37 (8.04-8.69) log10-units for ENR vs. 8.08 (7.77-8.39) log10-units for ST neonates. Gastrointestinal effects were mild and similar, with no statistical difference between two groups. Conclusion: Safety and growth ability of the enriched formula has been confirmed. A positive effect on neonatal gut microbiota, consisting of increased fecal BIF counts at T2 vs. baseline has been shown too. Nonetheless, larger RCTs are needed to estimate with greater precision the effective potential attributable to the enriched formula on neonatal microbiota, with particular reference to the mode of delivery.
AB - Background & aims: Safety and growth adequacy of infant formulae enriched by functional ingredients need stringent evaluation by means of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), therefore we performed a double-blind RCT to evaluate an infant formula enriched with galacto-oligosaccharides, beta-palmitate, and acidified milk vs. a standard infant formula. Methods: Weight, length, head circumference and fecal bacteria (Bifidobacteria, BIF/Clostridia, CLO) were measured in healthy full term infants, at baseline - as before 21 days of life - at 60 and 135 days thereafter. A group of 51 neonates received the enriched formula (ENR), 59 the standard one (ST). Parents were trained to daily register gastrointestinal diseases. Results: All the infants grew homogeneously increasing the anthropometric parameters and complying with WHO and Italian standards: the mean (SD) difference in daily weight between ENR and ST groups was -0.74 (1.13) g/day, corresponding to a 90% CI of -2.62 to 1.13 g/day, well within the postulated interval of equivalence of -3.9 to +3.9 g/day. A statistical improvement in BIF concentration in the microbiota of infants fed by ENR was recorded. There was no between-group change in log10CLO, but log10BIF increase was higher at T2 vs. T0 in ENR (treatment × time interaction = 0.71, 95% CI 0.08-1.34, p = 0.028) than in ST neonates. This corresponds to estimated mean (95% CI) values of 8.37 (8.04-8.69) log10-units for ENR vs. 8.08 (7.77-8.39) log10-units for ST neonates. Gastrointestinal effects were mild and similar, with no statistical difference between two groups. Conclusion: Safety and growth ability of the enriched formula has been confirmed. A positive effect on neonatal gut microbiota, consisting of increased fecal BIF counts at T2 vs. baseline has been shown too. Nonetheless, larger RCTs are needed to estimate with greater precision the effective potential attributable to the enriched formula on neonatal microbiota, with particular reference to the mode of delivery.
KW - Bifidobacteria
KW - Formula
KW - Microbiota
KW - Neonate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84950301383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84950301383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.11.006
DO - 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.11.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84950301383
JO - Clinical Nutrition
JF - Clinical Nutrition
SN - 0261-5614
ER -