Scar detection by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in chronic coronary artery disease

A comparison with nuclear imaging and echocardiography

Oronzo Catalano, Guido Moro, Giorgio Cannizzaro, Renato Mingrone, Cristina Opasich, Mariarosa Perotti, Felice Rognone, Mauro Frascaroli, Maurizia Saldi, Roberto Tramarin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared contrast-enhanced MRI (CeMRI) with the most widely used imaging techniques for myocardial infarct (MI) diagnosis, SPECT and Echo, in unselected patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). Two blinded operators assessed scars on MRI, SPECT and Echo images using a 16-segments LV model. We studied 105 consecutive patients: 50 had Q-wave MI (Q-MI), 19 non Q-wave MI or rest angina (nonQ-MI/RA) and 36 effort angina (EA) history. CeMRI was positive, respectively, in 96%, 37%, and 6%, SPECT in 90%, 53%, and 44%, and Echo in 84%, 32%, and 28% of patients (within Q-MI: CeMRI vs. SPECT p <0.03, vs. Echo p <0.001; within EA CeMRI vs. SPECT and ECHO p <0.001; all trends p <0.001, pseudo r-square: 0.56-0.75 for CeMRI, 0.18-0.28 for SPECT and 0.23-0.37 for Echo). CeMRI and SPECT agreed in 83 patients (79%); negative SPECT with 1 ± 0 segments subendocardial delayed enhancement (DE) was found in 4 (4%); negative CeMRI with 4 ± 3 segments perfusion defects in 18 (17%), 16 of whom were obese or showed LBB or sub-occlusion of related coronary. CeMRI and Echo agreed in 78 patients (75%); negative Echo with 2 ± 1 segments subendocardial DE was found in 13 (12%) and negative CeMRI with 11 ± 7 segments kinetic abnormalities in 14 (13%), in 10 confirmed by Cine-MRI. In Q-MI, CeMRI detects DE more frequently than perfusion defects and, especially, kinetic abnormalities are found by SPECT and Echo, respectively. CeMRI identifies small areas of DE also in some patients with nonQ-MI or RA but usually not in patients with EA. This biologically plausible decreasing trend is shown by CeMRI more clearly than by SPECT and Echo. Disagreement between CeMRI and SPECT or Echo may be reduced, but perhaps not fully eluded, performing dobutamine Echo and SPECT after maximal epicardial coronary dilatation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)639-647
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography
Cicatrix
Echocardiography
Coronary Artery Disease
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Myocardial Infarction
Perfusion
Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Dobutamine
Coronary Occlusion
Dilatation
History

Keywords

  • Angina
  • Echocardiography
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Myocardial infection
  • SPECT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Scar detection by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in chronic coronary artery disease : A comparison with nuclear imaging and echocardiography. / Catalano, Oronzo; Moro, Guido; Cannizzaro, Giorgio; Mingrone, Renato; Opasich, Cristina; Perotti, Mariarosa; Rognone, Felice; Frascaroli, Mauro; Saldi, Maurizia; Tramarin, Roberto.

In: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2005, p. 639-647.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Catalano, Oronzo ; Moro, Guido ; Cannizzaro, Giorgio ; Mingrone, Renato ; Opasich, Cristina ; Perotti, Mariarosa ; Rognone, Felice ; Frascaroli, Mauro ; Saldi, Maurizia ; Tramarin, Roberto. / Scar detection by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in chronic coronary artery disease : A comparison with nuclear imaging and echocardiography. In: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2005 ; Vol. 7, No. 4. pp. 639-647.
@article{1a464e8c0cf44d38b1222d937cfd90a5,
title = "Scar detection by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in chronic coronary artery disease: A comparison with nuclear imaging and echocardiography",
abstract = "We compared contrast-enhanced MRI (CeMRI) with the most widely used imaging techniques for myocardial infarct (MI) diagnosis, SPECT and Echo, in unselected patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). Two blinded operators assessed scars on MRI, SPECT and Echo images using a 16-segments LV model. We studied 105 consecutive patients: 50 had Q-wave MI (Q-MI), 19 non Q-wave MI or rest angina (nonQ-MI/RA) and 36 effort angina (EA) history. CeMRI was positive, respectively, in 96{\%}, 37{\%}, and 6{\%}, SPECT in 90{\%}, 53{\%}, and 44{\%}, and Echo in 84{\%}, 32{\%}, and 28{\%} of patients (within Q-MI: CeMRI vs. SPECT p <0.03, vs. Echo p <0.001; within EA CeMRI vs. SPECT and ECHO p <0.001; all trends p <0.001, pseudo r-square: 0.56-0.75 for CeMRI, 0.18-0.28 for SPECT and 0.23-0.37 for Echo). CeMRI and SPECT agreed in 83 patients (79{\%}); negative SPECT with 1 ± 0 segments subendocardial delayed enhancement (DE) was found in 4 (4{\%}); negative CeMRI with 4 ± 3 segments perfusion defects in 18 (17{\%}), 16 of whom were obese or showed LBB or sub-occlusion of related coronary. CeMRI and Echo agreed in 78 patients (75{\%}); negative Echo with 2 ± 1 segments subendocardial DE was found in 13 (12{\%}) and negative CeMRI with 11 ± 7 segments kinetic abnormalities in 14 (13{\%}), in 10 confirmed by Cine-MRI. In Q-MI, CeMRI detects DE more frequently than perfusion defects and, especially, kinetic abnormalities are found by SPECT and Echo, respectively. CeMRI identifies small areas of DE also in some patients with nonQ-MI or RA but usually not in patients with EA. This biologically plausible decreasing trend is shown by CeMRI more clearly than by SPECT and Echo. Disagreement between CeMRI and SPECT or Echo may be reduced, but perhaps not fully eluded, performing dobutamine Echo and SPECT after maximal epicardial coronary dilatation.",
keywords = "Angina, Echocardiography, Magnetic resonance imaging, Myocardial infection, SPECT",
author = "Oronzo Catalano and Guido Moro and Giorgio Cannizzaro and Renato Mingrone and Cristina Opasich and Mariarosa Perotti and Felice Rognone and Mauro Frascaroli and Maurizia Saldi and Roberto Tramarin",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1081/JCMR-65602",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "639--647",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance",
issn = "1097-6647",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scar detection by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in chronic coronary artery disease

T2 - A comparison with nuclear imaging and echocardiography

AU - Catalano, Oronzo

AU - Moro, Guido

AU - Cannizzaro, Giorgio

AU - Mingrone, Renato

AU - Opasich, Cristina

AU - Perotti, Mariarosa

AU - Rognone, Felice

AU - Frascaroli, Mauro

AU - Saldi, Maurizia

AU - Tramarin, Roberto

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - We compared contrast-enhanced MRI (CeMRI) with the most widely used imaging techniques for myocardial infarct (MI) diagnosis, SPECT and Echo, in unselected patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). Two blinded operators assessed scars on MRI, SPECT and Echo images using a 16-segments LV model. We studied 105 consecutive patients: 50 had Q-wave MI (Q-MI), 19 non Q-wave MI or rest angina (nonQ-MI/RA) and 36 effort angina (EA) history. CeMRI was positive, respectively, in 96%, 37%, and 6%, SPECT in 90%, 53%, and 44%, and Echo in 84%, 32%, and 28% of patients (within Q-MI: CeMRI vs. SPECT p <0.03, vs. Echo p <0.001; within EA CeMRI vs. SPECT and ECHO p <0.001; all trends p <0.001, pseudo r-square: 0.56-0.75 for CeMRI, 0.18-0.28 for SPECT and 0.23-0.37 for Echo). CeMRI and SPECT agreed in 83 patients (79%); negative SPECT with 1 ± 0 segments subendocardial delayed enhancement (DE) was found in 4 (4%); negative CeMRI with 4 ± 3 segments perfusion defects in 18 (17%), 16 of whom were obese or showed LBB or sub-occlusion of related coronary. CeMRI and Echo agreed in 78 patients (75%); negative Echo with 2 ± 1 segments subendocardial DE was found in 13 (12%) and negative CeMRI with 11 ± 7 segments kinetic abnormalities in 14 (13%), in 10 confirmed by Cine-MRI. In Q-MI, CeMRI detects DE more frequently than perfusion defects and, especially, kinetic abnormalities are found by SPECT and Echo, respectively. CeMRI identifies small areas of DE also in some patients with nonQ-MI or RA but usually not in patients with EA. This biologically plausible decreasing trend is shown by CeMRI more clearly than by SPECT and Echo. Disagreement between CeMRI and SPECT or Echo may be reduced, but perhaps not fully eluded, performing dobutamine Echo and SPECT after maximal epicardial coronary dilatation.

AB - We compared contrast-enhanced MRI (CeMRI) with the most widely used imaging techniques for myocardial infarct (MI) diagnosis, SPECT and Echo, in unselected patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). Two blinded operators assessed scars on MRI, SPECT and Echo images using a 16-segments LV model. We studied 105 consecutive patients: 50 had Q-wave MI (Q-MI), 19 non Q-wave MI or rest angina (nonQ-MI/RA) and 36 effort angina (EA) history. CeMRI was positive, respectively, in 96%, 37%, and 6%, SPECT in 90%, 53%, and 44%, and Echo in 84%, 32%, and 28% of patients (within Q-MI: CeMRI vs. SPECT p <0.03, vs. Echo p <0.001; within EA CeMRI vs. SPECT and ECHO p <0.001; all trends p <0.001, pseudo r-square: 0.56-0.75 for CeMRI, 0.18-0.28 for SPECT and 0.23-0.37 for Echo). CeMRI and SPECT agreed in 83 patients (79%); negative SPECT with 1 ± 0 segments subendocardial delayed enhancement (DE) was found in 4 (4%); negative CeMRI with 4 ± 3 segments perfusion defects in 18 (17%), 16 of whom were obese or showed LBB or sub-occlusion of related coronary. CeMRI and Echo agreed in 78 patients (75%); negative Echo with 2 ± 1 segments subendocardial DE was found in 13 (12%) and negative CeMRI with 11 ± 7 segments kinetic abnormalities in 14 (13%), in 10 confirmed by Cine-MRI. In Q-MI, CeMRI detects DE more frequently than perfusion defects and, especially, kinetic abnormalities are found by SPECT and Echo, respectively. CeMRI identifies small areas of DE also in some patients with nonQ-MI or RA but usually not in patients with EA. This biologically plausible decreasing trend is shown by CeMRI more clearly than by SPECT and Echo. Disagreement between CeMRI and SPECT or Echo may be reduced, but perhaps not fully eluded, performing dobutamine Echo and SPECT after maximal epicardial coronary dilatation.

KW - Angina

KW - Echocardiography

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Myocardial infection

KW - SPECT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23844555112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23844555112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1081/JCMR-65602

DO - 10.1081/JCMR-65602

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 639

EP - 647

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

SN - 1097-6647

IS - 4

ER -