Scheimpflug analysis of corneal power changes after myopic excimer laser surgery

Giacomo Savini, Kenneth J. Hoffer, Michele Carbonelli, Piero Barboni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the ability of corneal power measurements by a rotating Scheimpflug camera to measure the refractive change induced by myopic excimer laser surgery. Setting: G.B. Bietti Foundation-IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test. Methods: The following corneal power measurements by the Pentacam Scheimpflug camera were analyzed: average keratometry (K), true net power (calculated by Gaussian optics formula), and total corneal refractive power (TCRP) at 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm, and 4.0 mm, calculated by ray tracing on a ring and as the average of the zone inside the ring. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative values was compared with the subjective surgically induced refractive change (SIRC) and with the difference between the preoperative and the postoperative anterior corneal power measured by Placido corneal topography (Keratron). Results: In 36 consecutive eyes, the average K significantly underestimated the SIRC as determined by subjective refraction (-4.47 diopters [D] ± 1.81 [SD]) and corneal topography (-4.38 ± 1.81 D). The 3.0 mm and 4.0 mm ring total corneal refractive power significantly overestimated the SIRC. The remaining values did not show statistically significant differences with respect to the SIRC. The 3.0 mm zone TCRP and the 2.0 mm ring TCRP provided the lowest median difference compared with the SIRC (-0.07 D and -0.17 D, respectively) and the closest agreement. Conclusions: The corneal power values provided by the Scheimpflug camera accurately reflected the SIRC after myopic excimer laser surgery. The best options seem to be the 3.0 mm zone TCRP and the 2.0 mm ring TCRP. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)605-610
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Excimer Lasers
Laser Therapy
Corneal Topography
Power (Psychology)
Aptitude
Disclosure
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Italy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Surgery

Cite this

Scheimpflug analysis of corneal power changes after myopic excimer laser surgery. / Savini, Giacomo; Hoffer, Kenneth J.; Carbonelli, Michele; Barboni, Piero.

In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Vol. 39, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 605-610.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Savini, Giacomo ; Hoffer, Kenneth J. ; Carbonelli, Michele ; Barboni, Piero. / Scheimpflug analysis of corneal power changes after myopic excimer laser surgery. In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 605-610.
@article{e81acd191e9f4184b854640d9b08f043,
title = "Scheimpflug analysis of corneal power changes after myopic excimer laser surgery",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the ability of corneal power measurements by a rotating Scheimpflug camera to measure the refractive change induced by myopic excimer laser surgery. Setting: G.B. Bietti Foundation-IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test. Methods: The following corneal power measurements by the Pentacam Scheimpflug camera were analyzed: average keratometry (K), true net power (calculated by Gaussian optics formula), and total corneal refractive power (TCRP) at 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm, and 4.0 mm, calculated by ray tracing on a ring and as the average of the zone inside the ring. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative values was compared with the subjective surgically induced refractive change (SIRC) and with the difference between the preoperative and the postoperative anterior corneal power measured by Placido corneal topography (Keratron). Results: In 36 consecutive eyes, the average K significantly underestimated the SIRC as determined by subjective refraction (-4.47 diopters [D] ± 1.81 [SD]) and corneal topography (-4.38 ± 1.81 D). The 3.0 mm and 4.0 mm ring total corneal refractive power significantly overestimated the SIRC. The remaining values did not show statistically significant differences with respect to the SIRC. The 3.0 mm zone TCRP and the 2.0 mm ring TCRP provided the lowest median difference compared with the SIRC (-0.07 D and -0.17 D, respectively) and the closest agreement. Conclusions: The corneal power values provided by the Scheimpflug camera accurately reflected the SIRC after myopic excimer laser surgery. The best options seem to be the 3.0 mm zone TCRP and the 2.0 mm ring TCRP. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.",
author = "Giacomo Savini and Hoffer, {Kenneth J.} and Michele Carbonelli and Piero Barboni",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.12.031",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "605--610",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scheimpflug analysis of corneal power changes after myopic excimer laser surgery

AU - Savini, Giacomo

AU - Hoffer, Kenneth J.

AU - Carbonelli, Michele

AU - Barboni, Piero

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Purpose: To assess the ability of corneal power measurements by a rotating Scheimpflug camera to measure the refractive change induced by myopic excimer laser surgery. Setting: G.B. Bietti Foundation-IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test. Methods: The following corneal power measurements by the Pentacam Scheimpflug camera were analyzed: average keratometry (K), true net power (calculated by Gaussian optics formula), and total corneal refractive power (TCRP) at 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm, and 4.0 mm, calculated by ray tracing on a ring and as the average of the zone inside the ring. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative values was compared with the subjective surgically induced refractive change (SIRC) and with the difference between the preoperative and the postoperative anterior corneal power measured by Placido corneal topography (Keratron). Results: In 36 consecutive eyes, the average K significantly underestimated the SIRC as determined by subjective refraction (-4.47 diopters [D] ± 1.81 [SD]) and corneal topography (-4.38 ± 1.81 D). The 3.0 mm and 4.0 mm ring total corneal refractive power significantly overestimated the SIRC. The remaining values did not show statistically significant differences with respect to the SIRC. The 3.0 mm zone TCRP and the 2.0 mm ring TCRP provided the lowest median difference compared with the SIRC (-0.07 D and -0.17 D, respectively) and the closest agreement. Conclusions: The corneal power values provided by the Scheimpflug camera accurately reflected the SIRC after myopic excimer laser surgery. The best options seem to be the 3.0 mm zone TCRP and the 2.0 mm ring TCRP. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

AB - Purpose: To assess the ability of corneal power measurements by a rotating Scheimpflug camera to measure the refractive change induced by myopic excimer laser surgery. Setting: G.B. Bietti Foundation-IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test. Methods: The following corneal power measurements by the Pentacam Scheimpflug camera were analyzed: average keratometry (K), true net power (calculated by Gaussian optics formula), and total corneal refractive power (TCRP) at 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm, and 4.0 mm, calculated by ray tracing on a ring and as the average of the zone inside the ring. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative values was compared with the subjective surgically induced refractive change (SIRC) and with the difference between the preoperative and the postoperative anterior corneal power measured by Placido corneal topography (Keratron). Results: In 36 consecutive eyes, the average K significantly underestimated the SIRC as determined by subjective refraction (-4.47 diopters [D] ± 1.81 [SD]) and corneal topography (-4.38 ± 1.81 D). The 3.0 mm and 4.0 mm ring total corneal refractive power significantly overestimated the SIRC. The remaining values did not show statistically significant differences with respect to the SIRC. The 3.0 mm zone TCRP and the 2.0 mm ring TCRP provided the lowest median difference compared with the SIRC (-0.07 D and -0.17 D, respectively) and the closest agreement. Conclusions: The corneal power values provided by the Scheimpflug camera accurately reflected the SIRC after myopic excimer laser surgery. The best options seem to be the 3.0 mm zone TCRP and the 2.0 mm ring TCRP. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875425610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875425610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.12.031

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.12.031

M3 - Article

C2 - 23465330

AN - SCOPUS:84875425610

VL - 39

SP - 605

EP - 610

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 4

ER -