Second cancer in Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN-K). A nested case-control study

Tiziano Barbui, Arianna Ghirardi, Arianna Masciulli, Alessandra Carobbio, Francesca Palandri, Nicola Vianelli, Valerio De Stefano, Silvia Betti, Ambra Di Veroli, Alessandra Iurlo, Daniele Cattaneo, Federica Delaini, Massimiliano Bonifacio, Luigi Scaffidi, Andrea Patriarca, Elisa Rumi, Ilaria Carola Casetti, Clemency Stephenson, Paola Guglielmelli, Elena Maria ElliMiroslava Palova, Laura Bertolotti, Daniel Erez, Montse Gomez, Kai Wille, Manuel Perez-Encinas, Francesca Lunghi, Anna Angona, Maria Laura Fox, Eloise Beggiato, Giulia Benevolo, Giuseppe Carli, Rossella Cacciola, Mary Frances McMullin, Alessia Tieghi, Valle Recasens, Monia Marchetti, Martin Griesshammer, Alberto Alvarez-Larran, Alessandro Maria Vannucchi, Guido Finazzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We conducted a large international nested case-control study including 1881 patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Cases (n = 647) were patients with second cancer (SC: carcinoma, non-melanoma skin cancer, hematological second cancer, and melanoma) and controls (n = 1234) were patients without SC, matched with cases for sex, age at MPN diagnosis, date of MPN diagnosis, and MPN disease duration. The aim was to evaluate the risk of SC after exposure to cytoreductive drugs. Patients exposed to hydroxyurea (HU) (median: 3 years) had a risk of SC similar to unexposed patients (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.82–1.38). In contrast, in cancer-specific stratified multivariable analysis, HU had two-fold higher risk of non-melanoma (NM) skin cancer (OR = 2.28, 95% CI 1.15–4.51). A significantly higher risk of NM-skin cancer was also documented for pipobroman (OR = 3.74, 95% CI 1.00–14.01), ruxolitinib (OR = 3.87, 95% CI 1.18–12.75), and for drug combination (OR = 3.47, 95% CI 1.55–7.75). These three drugs did not show excess risk of carcinoma and hematological second cancer compared with unexposed patients. Exposure to interferon, busulfan, and anagrelide did not increase the risk. In summary, while it is reassuring that no excess of carcinoma was documented, a careful dermatologic active surveillance before and during the course of treatments is recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1996-2005
JournalLeukemia
Volume33
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Second cancer in Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN-K). A nested case-control study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Barbui, T., Ghirardi, A., Masciulli, A., Carobbio, A., Palandri, F., Vianelli, N., De Stefano, V., Betti, S., Di Veroli, A., Iurlo, A., Cattaneo, D., Delaini, F., Bonifacio, M., Scaffidi, L., Patriarca, A., Rumi, E., Casetti, I. C., Stephenson, C., Guglielmelli, P., ... Finazzi, G. (2019). Second cancer in Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN-K). A nested case-control study. Leukemia, 33(8), 1996-2005. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-019-0487-8