Secondary malignant neoplasms, progression-free survival and overall survival in patients treated for Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Dennis A Eichenauer, Ingrid Becker, Ina Monsef, Nicholas Chadwick, Vitaliana de Sanctis, Massimo Federico, Catherine Fortpied, Alessandro M Gianni, Michel Henry-Amar, Peter Hoskin, Peter Johnson, Stefano Luminari, Monica Bellei, Alessandro Pulsoni, Matthew R Sydes, Pinuccia Valagussa, Simonetta Viviani, Andreas Engert, Jeremy Franklin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Treatment intensification to maximize disease control and reduced intensity approaches to minimize the risk of late sequelae have been evaluated in newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma. The influence of these interventions on the risk of secondary malignant neoplasms, progression-free survival and overall survival is reported in the meta-analysis herein, based on individual patient data from 9498 patients treated within 16 randomized controlled trials for newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma between 1984 and 2007. Secondary malignant neoplasms were meta-analyzed using Peto's method as time-to-event outcomes. For progression-free and overall survival, hazard ratios derived from each trial using Cox regression were combined by inverse-variance weighting. Five study questions (combined-modality treatmentvs.chemotherapy alone; more extendedvs.involved-field radiotherapy; radiation at higher dosesvs.radiation at 20 Gy; morevs.fewer cycles of the same chemotherapy protocol; standard-dose chemotherapyvs.intensified chemotherapy) were investigated. After a median follow-up of 7.4 years, dose-intensified chemotherapy resulted in better progression-free survival rates (P=0.007) as compared with standard-dose chemotherapy, but was associated with an increased risk of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromes (P=0.0028). No progression-free or overall survival differences were observed between combined-modality treatment and chemotherapy alone, but more secondary malignant neoplasms were seen after combined-modality treatment (P=0.010). For the remaining three study questions, outcomes and secondary malignancy rates did not differ significantly between treatment strategies. The results of this meta-analysis help to weigh up efficacy and secondary malignancy risk for the choice of first-line treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma patients. However, final conclusions regarding secondary solid tumors require longer follow-up.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1748-1757
Number of pages10
JournalHaematologica
Volume102
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Secondary malignant neoplasms, progression-free survival and overall survival in patients treated for Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Eichenauer, D. A., Becker, I., Monsef, I., Chadwick, N., de Sanctis, V., Federico, M., Fortpied, C., Gianni, A. M., Henry-Amar, M., Hoskin, P., Johnson, P., Luminari, S., Bellei, M., Pulsoni, A., Sydes, M. R., Valagussa, P., Viviani, S., Engert, A., & Franklin, J. (2017). Secondary malignant neoplasms, progression-free survival and overall survival in patients treated for Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Haematologica, 102(10), 1748-1757. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.167478