Semantic category dissociations, familiarity and gender

E. Albanese, E. Capitani, R. Barbarotto, M. Laiacona

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We carried out four experiments to assess the extent to which familiarity with certain objects in everyday life is related to gender and can account, at least partially, for the semantic category dissociation observed in a few brain-damaged patients. In the first experiment, 210 normal subjects, half males and half females, were given the names of 60 stimuli from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart's set, 30 belonging to living categories and 30 to non-living categories. The task was to rate their familiarity, based on the frequency with which one (i) thinks or speaks of a given item, (ii) sees it represented in the media, and (iii) is confronted with real exemplars. The three indices were highly correlated and their average value was, therefore, used. Females gave higher familiarity ratings to fruit, vegetables and furniture and males to tools. The second experiment was aimed to verify whether the gender difference was responsible for the category dissociation found following brain damage. A male patient with greater impairment for living categories and a female patient with greater impairment for non-living categories were requested to name the same 60 stimuli and their scores were analysed, partialling out the familiarity effect, measured both with the non-gender specific index of Snodgrass and Vanderwart and with the new gender-specific index. In either case, the category dissociation remained significant. To determine if the mean general population familiarity index was valid for the single subject, we studied whether a cohabitant first degree relative was able to predict a normal subject's familiarity better than the population index. Contrary to expectations, the better predictor was the population index. The test-retest reliability of each subject's familiarity ratings was satisfactory, but not higher than the correlation between the personal judgement of each subject and the population index.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)733-746
Number of pages14
JournalCortex
Volume36
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Semantics
Population
Names
Interior Design and Furnishings
Brain
Recognition (Psychology)
Reproducibility of Results
Vegetables
Fruit

Keywords

  • Concept familiarity
  • Gender
  • Semantic categories

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Albanese, E., Capitani, E., Barbarotto, R., & Laiacona, M. (2000). Semantic category dissociations, familiarity and gender. Cortex, 36(5), 733-746.

Semantic category dissociations, familiarity and gender. / Albanese, E.; Capitani, E.; Barbarotto, R.; Laiacona, M.

In: Cortex, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2000, p. 733-746.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Albanese, E, Capitani, E, Barbarotto, R & Laiacona, M 2000, 'Semantic category dissociations, familiarity and gender', Cortex, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 733-746.
Albanese E, Capitani E, Barbarotto R, Laiacona M. Semantic category dissociations, familiarity and gender. Cortex. 2000;36(5):733-746.
Albanese, E. ; Capitani, E. ; Barbarotto, R. ; Laiacona, M. / Semantic category dissociations, familiarity and gender. In: Cortex. 2000 ; Vol. 36, No. 5. pp. 733-746.
@article{bb7ec9d1128748999cce9bf44a28d737,
title = "Semantic category dissociations, familiarity and gender",
abstract = "We carried out four experiments to assess the extent to which familiarity with certain objects in everyday life is related to gender and can account, at least partially, for the semantic category dissociation observed in a few brain-damaged patients. In the first experiment, 210 normal subjects, half males and half females, were given the names of 60 stimuli from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart's set, 30 belonging to living categories and 30 to non-living categories. The task was to rate their familiarity, based on the frequency with which one (i) thinks or speaks of a given item, (ii) sees it represented in the media, and (iii) is confronted with real exemplars. The three indices were highly correlated and their average value was, therefore, used. Females gave higher familiarity ratings to fruit, vegetables and furniture and males to tools. The second experiment was aimed to verify whether the gender difference was responsible for the category dissociation found following brain damage. A male patient with greater impairment for living categories and a female patient with greater impairment for non-living categories were requested to name the same 60 stimuli and their scores were analysed, partialling out the familiarity effect, measured both with the non-gender specific index of Snodgrass and Vanderwart and with the new gender-specific index. In either case, the category dissociation remained significant. To determine if the mean general population familiarity index was valid for the single subject, we studied whether a cohabitant first degree relative was able to predict a normal subject's familiarity better than the population index. Contrary to expectations, the better predictor was the population index. The test-retest reliability of each subject's familiarity ratings was satisfactory, but not higher than the correlation between the personal judgement of each subject and the population index.",
keywords = "Concept familiarity, Gender, Semantic categories",
author = "E. Albanese and E. Capitani and R. Barbarotto and M. Laiacona",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "733--746",
journal = "Cortex",
issn = "0010-9452",
publisher = "Masson SpA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Semantic category dissociations, familiarity and gender

AU - Albanese, E.

AU - Capitani, E.

AU - Barbarotto, R.

AU - Laiacona, M.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - We carried out four experiments to assess the extent to which familiarity with certain objects in everyday life is related to gender and can account, at least partially, for the semantic category dissociation observed in a few brain-damaged patients. In the first experiment, 210 normal subjects, half males and half females, were given the names of 60 stimuli from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart's set, 30 belonging to living categories and 30 to non-living categories. The task was to rate their familiarity, based on the frequency with which one (i) thinks or speaks of a given item, (ii) sees it represented in the media, and (iii) is confronted with real exemplars. The three indices were highly correlated and their average value was, therefore, used. Females gave higher familiarity ratings to fruit, vegetables and furniture and males to tools. The second experiment was aimed to verify whether the gender difference was responsible for the category dissociation found following brain damage. A male patient with greater impairment for living categories and a female patient with greater impairment for non-living categories were requested to name the same 60 stimuli and their scores were analysed, partialling out the familiarity effect, measured both with the non-gender specific index of Snodgrass and Vanderwart and with the new gender-specific index. In either case, the category dissociation remained significant. To determine if the mean general population familiarity index was valid for the single subject, we studied whether a cohabitant first degree relative was able to predict a normal subject's familiarity better than the population index. Contrary to expectations, the better predictor was the population index. The test-retest reliability of each subject's familiarity ratings was satisfactory, but not higher than the correlation between the personal judgement of each subject and the population index.

AB - We carried out four experiments to assess the extent to which familiarity with certain objects in everyday life is related to gender and can account, at least partially, for the semantic category dissociation observed in a few brain-damaged patients. In the first experiment, 210 normal subjects, half males and half females, were given the names of 60 stimuli from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart's set, 30 belonging to living categories and 30 to non-living categories. The task was to rate their familiarity, based on the frequency with which one (i) thinks or speaks of a given item, (ii) sees it represented in the media, and (iii) is confronted with real exemplars. The three indices were highly correlated and their average value was, therefore, used. Females gave higher familiarity ratings to fruit, vegetables and furniture and males to tools. The second experiment was aimed to verify whether the gender difference was responsible for the category dissociation found following brain damage. A male patient with greater impairment for living categories and a female patient with greater impairment for non-living categories were requested to name the same 60 stimuli and their scores were analysed, partialling out the familiarity effect, measured both with the non-gender specific index of Snodgrass and Vanderwart and with the new gender-specific index. In either case, the category dissociation remained significant. To determine if the mean general population familiarity index was valid for the single subject, we studied whether a cohabitant first degree relative was able to predict a normal subject's familiarity better than the population index. Contrary to expectations, the better predictor was the population index. The test-retest reliability of each subject's familiarity ratings was satisfactory, but not higher than the correlation between the personal judgement of each subject and the population index.

KW - Concept familiarity

KW - Gender

KW - Semantic categories

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034521469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034521469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 733

EP - 746

JO - Cortex

JF - Cortex

SN - 0010-9452

IS - 5

ER -