Semi-quantification and grading of amyloid PET: A project of the European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC)

A. Chincarini, E. Peira, S. Morbelli, M. Pardini, M. Bauckneht, J. Arbizu, M. Castelo-Branco, K. A. Büsing, A. de Mendonça, M. Didic, M. Dottorini, S. Engelborghs, C. Ferrarese, G. B. Frisoni, V. Garibotto, E. Guedj, L. Hausner, J. Hugon, J. Verhaeghe, P. MecocciM. Musarra, M. Queneau, M. Riverol, I. Santana, U. P. Guerra, F. Nobili

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: amyloid-PET reading has been classically implemented as a binary assessment, although the clinical experience has shown that the number of borderline cases is non negligible not only in epidemiological studies of asymptomatic subjects but also in naturalistic groups of symptomatic patients attending memory clinics. In this work we develop a model to compare and integrate visual reading with two independent semi-quantification methods in order to obtain a tracer-independent multi-parametric evaluation. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled three cohorts of cognitively impaired patients submitted to 18 F-florbetaben (53 subjects), 18 F-flutemetamol (62 subjects), 18 F-florbetapir (60 subjects)PET/CT respectively, in 6 European centres belonging to the EADC. The 175 scans were visually classified as positive/negative following approved criteria and further classified with a 5-step grading as negative, mild negative, borderline, mild positive, positive by 5 independent readers, blind to clinical data. Scan quality was also visually assessed and recorded. Semi-quantification was based on two quantifiers: the standardized uptake value (SUVr)and the ELBA method. We used a sigmoid model to relate the grading with the quantifiers. We measured the readers accord and inconsistencies in the visual assessment as well as the relationship between discrepancies on the grading and semi-quantifications. Conclusion: It is possible to construct a map between different tracers and different quantification methods without resorting to ad-hoc acquired cases. We used a 5-level visual scale which, together with a mathematical model, delivered cut-offs and transition regions on tracers that are (largely)independent from the population. All fluorinated tracers appeared to have the same contrast and discrimination ability with respect to the negative-to-positive grading. We validated the integration of both visual reading and different quantifiers in a more robust framework thus bridging the gap between a binary and a user-independent continuous scale.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101846
JournalNeuroImage: Clinical
Volume23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Amyloid
Alzheimer Disease
Reading
Aptitude
Sigmoid Colon
Epidemiologic Studies
Theoretical Models
Population

Keywords

  • Amyloid PET
  • Semi-quantification
  • Visual assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Semi-quantification and grading of amyloid PET : A project of the European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC). / Chincarini, A.; Peira, E.; Morbelli, S.; Pardini, M.; Bauckneht, M.; Arbizu, J.; Castelo-Branco, M.; Büsing, K. A.; de Mendonça, A.; Didic, M.; Dottorini, M.; Engelborghs, S.; Ferrarese, C.; Frisoni, G. B.; Garibotto, V.; Guedj, E.; Hausner, L.; Hugon, J.; Verhaeghe, J.; Mecocci, P.; Musarra, M.; Queneau, M.; Riverol, M.; Santana, I.; Guerra, U. P.; Nobili, F.

In: NeuroImage: Clinical, Vol. 23, 101846, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chincarini, A, Peira, E, Morbelli, S, Pardini, M, Bauckneht, M, Arbizu, J, Castelo-Branco, M, Büsing, KA, de Mendonça, A, Didic, M, Dottorini, M, Engelborghs, S, Ferrarese, C, Frisoni, GB, Garibotto, V, Guedj, E, Hausner, L, Hugon, J, Verhaeghe, J, Mecocci, P, Musarra, M, Queneau, M, Riverol, M, Santana, I, Guerra, UP & Nobili, F 2019, 'Semi-quantification and grading of amyloid PET: A project of the European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC)', NeuroImage: Clinical, vol. 23, 101846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101846
Chincarini, A. ; Peira, E. ; Morbelli, S. ; Pardini, M. ; Bauckneht, M. ; Arbizu, J. ; Castelo-Branco, M. ; Büsing, K. A. ; de Mendonça, A. ; Didic, M. ; Dottorini, M. ; Engelborghs, S. ; Ferrarese, C. ; Frisoni, G. B. ; Garibotto, V. ; Guedj, E. ; Hausner, L. ; Hugon, J. ; Verhaeghe, J. ; Mecocci, P. ; Musarra, M. ; Queneau, M. ; Riverol, M. ; Santana, I. ; Guerra, U. P. ; Nobili, F. / Semi-quantification and grading of amyloid PET : A project of the European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC). In: NeuroImage: Clinical. 2019 ; Vol. 23.
@article{06249b7bc604475fb8745d0fca555fcc,
title = "Semi-quantification and grading of amyloid PET: A project of the European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC)",
abstract = "Background: amyloid-PET reading has been classically implemented as a binary assessment, although the clinical experience has shown that the number of borderline cases is non negligible not only in epidemiological studies of asymptomatic subjects but also in naturalistic groups of symptomatic patients attending memory clinics. In this work we develop a model to compare and integrate visual reading with two independent semi-quantification methods in order to obtain a tracer-independent multi-parametric evaluation. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled three cohorts of cognitively impaired patients submitted to 18 F-florbetaben (53 subjects), 18 F-flutemetamol (62 subjects), 18 F-florbetapir (60 subjects)PET/CT respectively, in 6 European centres belonging to the EADC. The 175 scans were visually classified as positive/negative following approved criteria and further classified with a 5-step grading as negative, mild negative, borderline, mild positive, positive by 5 independent readers, blind to clinical data. Scan quality was also visually assessed and recorded. Semi-quantification was based on two quantifiers: the standardized uptake value (SUVr)and the ELBA method. We used a sigmoid model to relate the grading with the quantifiers. We measured the readers accord and inconsistencies in the visual assessment as well as the relationship between discrepancies on the grading and semi-quantifications. Conclusion: It is possible to construct a map between different tracers and different quantification methods without resorting to ad-hoc acquired cases. We used a 5-level visual scale which, together with a mathematical model, delivered cut-offs and transition regions on tracers that are (largely)independent from the population. All fluorinated tracers appeared to have the same contrast and discrimination ability with respect to the negative-to-positive grading. We validated the integration of both visual reading and different quantifiers in a more robust framework thus bridging the gap between a binary and a user-independent continuous scale.",
keywords = "Amyloid PET, Semi-quantification, Visual assessment",
author = "A. Chincarini and E. Peira and S. Morbelli and M. Pardini and M. Bauckneht and J. Arbizu and M. Castelo-Branco and B{\"u}sing, {K. A.} and {de Mendon{\cc}a}, A. and M. Didic and M. Dottorini and S. Engelborghs and C. Ferrarese and Frisoni, {G. B.} and V. Garibotto and E. Guedj and L. Hausner and J. Hugon and J. Verhaeghe and P. Mecocci and M. Musarra and M. Queneau and M. Riverol and I. Santana and Guerra, {U. P.} and F. Nobili",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101846",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
journal = "NeuroImage: Clinical",
issn = "2213-1582",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCI LTD",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Semi-quantification and grading of amyloid PET

T2 - A project of the European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC)

AU - Chincarini, A.

AU - Peira, E.

AU - Morbelli, S.

AU - Pardini, M.

AU - Bauckneht, M.

AU - Arbizu, J.

AU - Castelo-Branco, M.

AU - Büsing, K. A.

AU - de Mendonça, A.

AU - Didic, M.

AU - Dottorini, M.

AU - Engelborghs, S.

AU - Ferrarese, C.

AU - Frisoni, G. B.

AU - Garibotto, V.

AU - Guedj, E.

AU - Hausner, L.

AU - Hugon, J.

AU - Verhaeghe, J.

AU - Mecocci, P.

AU - Musarra, M.

AU - Queneau, M.

AU - Riverol, M.

AU - Santana, I.

AU - Guerra, U. P.

AU - Nobili, F.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: amyloid-PET reading has been classically implemented as a binary assessment, although the clinical experience has shown that the number of borderline cases is non negligible not only in epidemiological studies of asymptomatic subjects but also in naturalistic groups of symptomatic patients attending memory clinics. In this work we develop a model to compare and integrate visual reading with two independent semi-quantification methods in order to obtain a tracer-independent multi-parametric evaluation. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled three cohorts of cognitively impaired patients submitted to 18 F-florbetaben (53 subjects), 18 F-flutemetamol (62 subjects), 18 F-florbetapir (60 subjects)PET/CT respectively, in 6 European centres belonging to the EADC. The 175 scans were visually classified as positive/negative following approved criteria and further classified with a 5-step grading as negative, mild negative, borderline, mild positive, positive by 5 independent readers, blind to clinical data. Scan quality was also visually assessed and recorded. Semi-quantification was based on two quantifiers: the standardized uptake value (SUVr)and the ELBA method. We used a sigmoid model to relate the grading with the quantifiers. We measured the readers accord and inconsistencies in the visual assessment as well as the relationship between discrepancies on the grading and semi-quantifications. Conclusion: It is possible to construct a map between different tracers and different quantification methods without resorting to ad-hoc acquired cases. We used a 5-level visual scale which, together with a mathematical model, delivered cut-offs and transition regions on tracers that are (largely)independent from the population. All fluorinated tracers appeared to have the same contrast and discrimination ability with respect to the negative-to-positive grading. We validated the integration of both visual reading and different quantifiers in a more robust framework thus bridging the gap between a binary and a user-independent continuous scale.

AB - Background: amyloid-PET reading has been classically implemented as a binary assessment, although the clinical experience has shown that the number of borderline cases is non negligible not only in epidemiological studies of asymptomatic subjects but also in naturalistic groups of symptomatic patients attending memory clinics. In this work we develop a model to compare and integrate visual reading with two independent semi-quantification methods in order to obtain a tracer-independent multi-parametric evaluation. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled three cohorts of cognitively impaired patients submitted to 18 F-florbetaben (53 subjects), 18 F-flutemetamol (62 subjects), 18 F-florbetapir (60 subjects)PET/CT respectively, in 6 European centres belonging to the EADC. The 175 scans were visually classified as positive/negative following approved criteria and further classified with a 5-step grading as negative, mild negative, borderline, mild positive, positive by 5 independent readers, blind to clinical data. Scan quality was also visually assessed and recorded. Semi-quantification was based on two quantifiers: the standardized uptake value (SUVr)and the ELBA method. We used a sigmoid model to relate the grading with the quantifiers. We measured the readers accord and inconsistencies in the visual assessment as well as the relationship between discrepancies on the grading and semi-quantifications. Conclusion: It is possible to construct a map between different tracers and different quantification methods without resorting to ad-hoc acquired cases. We used a 5-level visual scale which, together with a mathematical model, delivered cut-offs and transition regions on tracers that are (largely)independent from the population. All fluorinated tracers appeared to have the same contrast and discrimination ability with respect to the negative-to-positive grading. We validated the integration of both visual reading and different quantifiers in a more robust framework thus bridging the gap between a binary and a user-independent continuous scale.

KW - Amyloid PET

KW - Semi-quantification

KW - Visual assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065237755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065237755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101846

DO - 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101846

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065237755

VL - 23

JO - NeuroImage: Clinical

JF - NeuroImage: Clinical

SN - 2213-1582

M1 - 101846

ER -